Recently, the "small essay incident" selected by Dongfang has caused an uproar and has become the focus of public opinion on the Internet. This turmoil has sparked a heated controversy among netizens, involving the culture of the fan circle, which makes people think about the various factors behind it.
Regarding this incident, whether it is Dong Yuhui, Dongfang Xiaosun, or even Yu Minhong, they all clarified through video, but surprisingly, these clarifications were not recognized by most netizens, causing more questions.
Who is the author of the essay is not the key question, why the editor who caused this turmoil is so bold is not the core concern, and even Dongfang Xiaosun's response is secondary at this stage. More importantly, Oriental Selection is experiencing a huge "Hui" change in this turmoil.
The reason why Dongfang Selection was able to emerge quickly is largely due to Dong Yuhui. He frequently complained, paving a development path for Dongfang Selection featuring knowledge and goods. However, after becoming famous, some people began to question whether Dong Yuhui was a high-ranking master, and whether Dongfang Selection relied too much on him, which may have been the fuse for the outbreak of the small composition incident, and an old-fashioned infighting was implemented.
The stories in history are often strikingly similar, and the founding heroes of ancient China rarely died well. For example, Liu Bang's treatment of Han Xin, Zhu Yuanzhang's treatment of Xu Da, Zhao Kuangyin's treatment of Shi Shouxin and other examples all show that the ending of heroes under the power scheme is rarely spared.
However, Dongfang Xiaosun is not Song Taizu, and Dong Yuhui is not Shi Shouxin. Although there is an allusion to "a glass of wine releases military power" in historical classics, the reality is complex and changeable. Song Taizu resolved the issue of military power through honest dialogue, while Dongfang Xiaosun's dilemma may require a more complex solution.
The plot of the novel may provide us with some inspiration, but the business of a company is not a complete analogy with the rule of history. The dilemma of Oriental selection may require a more open and inclusive way of communication, rather than simply applying historical allusions.
In the small essay incident, Dongfang Selection seemed to be too worried about the company's limited development, so it chose an old path similar to the destruction of heroes in history. However, this may not be the only way out. Companies are in a growth phase, and disagreements between founders and core teams are the norm, but there shouldn't be just one solution.
The behavior of the editor in the live broadcast room, it is hard to believe that no one instructed him. suppressed Dong Yuhui's image through the creator of the small composition, which caused a strong response. Dong Yuhui responded that he wanted to calm down the incident, but the editor responded with an aggrieved attitude that there was no "Hu reply", such a quarrel is obviously not something that an ordinary editor can do.
Dongfang Xiaosun's clarification is more like a guide, trying to shift everyone's focus to Dong Yuhui's income issue, arousing some hatred of the rich. However, this strategy did not work, and eventually Yu Minhong and Dongfang Xiaosun apologized again.
The reason why the "small essay incident" has won the support of the majority of netizens is probably because people expect the hard work of employees to be duly rewarded, which incorporates a lot of resonance of personal struggle. Although this turmoil is lively, it may soon subside, and the final outcome may be that after a period of calm, Dong Yuhui took the initiative to resign, and Dongfang Selection announced a "peaceful breakup".
However, this result was not what everyone was expecting. This turmoil is undoubtedly a small episode in a business blockbuster, which may be able to change the fate of the company and become a key node in its development process.
The whole "Small Composition Incident" is like a business war blockbuster, heroes from all walks of life gather together, each playing their own role, and the final ending is full of unknowns. The turmoil could be just an episode in the company's development, or it could be a deep business reflection from which everyone involved can hopefully learn from it.
Perhaps, the end of this drama is not just a person's resignation, a company's announcement of a "peaceful breakup", but more likely a deep reflection on business ethics. So that each participant can find their own reflection and growth.
In this suspenseful drama, we should also reflect on our positions and choices in the workplace. As an audience, we may not be able to influence the development of the plot, but we can strive to pursue fairness and justice in our own work and contribute to the healthy development of the company. This turmoil is not only about Oriental Selection, but also a reflection and choice in everyone's professional career.
In this era of information dissemination, the power of public opinion cannot be ignored. Every small decision can make or break a company's reputation and fate. Each of us is an integral part of the company's destiny. This turmoil may show us that the business world needs more fairness, justice and respect, and everyone has a responsibility to maintain this balance.
In the end, expect a satisfying ending to this drama. At the same time, it is also expected that every company can learn from such an incident and welcome a better future. I hope that everyone who is struggling in the workplace can see their own reflection and growth in this turmoil.