When the Israeli-Palestinian conflict escalated, Israel quickly mobilized 360,000 reserve troops to prepare for a possible large-scale ground offensive. However, it is striking that the Israeli army has been slow to launch a large-scale offensive, which has raised doubts from the outside world. It was only twenty days after the escalation of the conflict that Israel launched its first large-scale attack. This procrastination is not only puzzling, but also reveals the decline of Israel's military power.
This harsh reality has sparked widespread concern. As a non-Islamic country with a population of just over 8 million, Israel is surrounded by powerful enemies, so it has implemented a compulsory military service system. Adults over the age of 18, both male and female, are required to serve in the military for a period of 21-24 months. After the end of military service, they all entered the reserve period and could be called back to active duty at any time.
This set of issues underscores the vulnerability of the IDF. The Israeli army's performance in the past 20 days of conflict has been troubling. On the first day of the conflict, Hamas death squads managed to infiltrate Israel, and the border guard forces suffered heavy losses. So far, the Israeli army has lost more than 50 Merkava tanks, and the blow to the Hamas militants has come mainly from the air force.
These are all signs that the IDF today is no longer the invincible army it once was. Despite the fact that the Israeli army performed well in the five Middle East wars from 1948 to 1982 and was supported by Western countries, today, the myth of war in Israel is disintegrating. Israel's small size precludes large-scale warfare and relies on small-scale tactical units, which require a large number of specialized arms such as armor, communications, air defense, and electronic warfare. However, the national service system can only train a large number of mobilized soldiers, who can only master basic tactical movements, and cannot replace professional arms.
Whether it is the Russia-Ukraine conflict or the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it reminds other countries that they cannot blindly pursue the streamlining and modernization of their armies, that ground war is still the main direction of war, and that living forces are still the ultimate means of determining the outcome of the war. These issues not only affect Israel, but also raise profound questions about the defense strategies of other countries.
Revelation:
After the escalation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, there was a significant time lag between the mobilization of the Israeli army and its actual actions, exposing a series of problems. This provides us with important implications not only for understanding today's international conflicts, but also for food for thought, as it relates to military power, national security, and global geopolitics. Here are some important takeaways:
Advantages and disadvantages of full military service: Israel has a full military service system, which allows for the rapid mobilization of large armies in the event of an emergency. However, the system has also exposed inadequate resources, inadequate equipment and inadequate professional training. This tells us that the full military service system needs to strengthen equipment and training to improve military effectiveness while safeguarding national security.
Economic and Military Balance: The imbalance between the salaries and prices of Israeli soldiers highlights the relationship between the economy and the military. This suggests that military spending must be balanced with social welfare in national security policy to ensure that the state has sufficient resources to support the military in the event of conflict.
Summary:
After the escalation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, there was a clear time lag between Israel's military preparations and actual actions, which triggered a series of important revelations. These revelations have broad applicability in the field of international conflict and national security, providing profound lessons and food for thought.
First, the time lag between mobilization and actual combat underscores the need for the military to be on high alert at all times in order to be able to act quickly in the face of threats. It also underscores the critical importance of intelligence gathering and decision-making in order to respond in a timely manner.
Second, the advantages and disadvantages of full military service need to be balanced. Although full military service allows for the rapid mobilization of large armies, it also requires more resources for equipment and training to increase military effectiveness. Countries need to strike a balance between military needs and resource allocation.
Finally, modern and professional military forces are more effective in the face of complex threats. The state needs to invest in modern military technology and training specialized arms to ensure that the military is equipped to maintain national security.
In general, the time lag between Israel's military preparations and actions reveals the complexity of national security and the maintenance of military power. This applies not only to Israel but also to other countries, emphasizing the need to maintain national security, which requires a combination of military, economic, and political factors.
The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.