The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Introduction:
Recently, the offline performance market is experiencing a warm recovery, many large-scale concerts have been restarted, and electronic ticketing has also become a topic of great concern. However, the frequent refund announcements on Weibo make people a little confused, why do hard-to-find concerts such as Rene Liu and Liang Jingru frequently appear to be refunded? In this article, we'll reorganize this information in an attempt to unravel the mystery behind the "strong real-name" policy and explore its impact on viewers and scalpers.
Third paragraph:
The "strong real name" policy appears to be a counter-effort to scalpers and to discourage them from taking advantage of the opportunity to make profits. However, judging by the current situation, this policy may also backfire on the audience. The implementation of the policy of "strong real name + non-transferable + non-refundable" makes ordinary audiences face more problems in ticket purchase, transfer, and refund. For example, some spectators who purchased tickets found that they needed to be refunded due to illness, incorrect information, work schedule conflicts, etc., but under this policy, they were in a difficult situation. This shows that the real-name policy needs to be improved more to solve the contradictions before and after ticket purchase, so that consumers can buy tickets with more confidence.
Fourth paragraph:
So, how to balance the prevention of premium hype by scalpers and the protection of the rights and interests of "true fans"? Some netizens proposed a refund scheme that mimics airlines, that is, a tiered refund policy, and as the performance approaches, the handling fee required for ticket refunds gradually increases to subsidize the platform's losses. This approach can solve the problem to a certain extent, but it also requires the platform party to increase the negligence liability of the ticket purchaser when handling the refund and exchange of tickets, otherwise it may lead to more scalpers and purchasing agents.
Fifth paragraph:
As for how to protect the legitimate rights and interests of "fans", some industry insiders said that they will organize music parties and other activities, and generally do not support ticket refunds, because this will bring great uncertainty to the operator. This suggests that we need to have a clearer division of rights and responsibilities in the concert ticket buying process, so as to protect the interests of "true fans" while preventing scalping.
Paragraph 6:
Finally, some netizens called for a boycott of scalpers, believing that actively refusing to buy scalpers tickets is the best way. However, this view is not accepted by everyone, as it is impossible to predict what will happen in the coming months, and some viewers may have to refund their tickets for various reasons, so a reasonable refund policy will be even more important.
Epilogue:
To sum up, the recovery of the performance market and the controversy caused by the "strong real name" policy have sparked a lot of discussion. The real-name ticketing policy is designed to discourage scalpers, but it also creates a series of problems for viewers. The balance between preventing scalpers and protecting the rights and interests of the audience requires more discussion and improvement to ensure the healthy development of the performance market. In any case, this topic will continue to gain traction, and perhaps a better solution will emerge over time.
1
The recent issue of ticket refunds for concerts has aroused widespread concern and discussion. This topic inspires us to think deeply about several important questions. First of all, the real-name ticket purchase rule restricts the freedom of ticket buyers to a certain extent, especially for those who need to refund or transfer tickets for various reasons. This suggests that we need to balance the protection of the performance organizer and the protection of the audience's rights and interests in the real-name ticketing policy.
Second, the advent of e-tickets has made it easier for scalpers to transfer tickets, as they can make huge profits by constantly finding buyers. This begs the question: how can we effectively crack down on scalpers while ensuring that legitimate audiences can reasonably buy tickets?
Another question worth pondering is, is the refund policy reasonable? Before purchasing tickets, audience members often can't predict whether there will be an emergency in the future, resulting in not being able to attend the show. Therefore, some viewers believe that ticketing platforms should develop a tiered refund plan to make ticket refunds a viable option, and at the same time, the platform can also charge a certain handling fee to make up for the loss.
Finally, how to protect the rights and interests of real fans? Show organizers and ticketing platforms need to find ways to enable real fans to buy tickets at a reasonable price, without being monopolized by scalpers and daigou buyers. This requires balancing supply and demand to ensure a fairer and more transparent performance market.
2
The recent issue of ticket refunds for concerts has sparked a lot of discussion about real-name ticket purchases, e-tickets, and scalpers. From these discussions, we can draw some important conclusions and recommendations.
First of all, although the real-name ticketing policy is aimed at cracking down on scalpers, it also imposes a certain degree of restriction on the freedom of ticket buyers. Policymakers need to carefully weigh the relationship between protecting the rights and interests of performance organizers and audiences to ensure that the policy is reasonable and fair.
Secondly, the advent of e-tickets has provided new opportunities for scalpers to make money, as they can use the transfer to make huge profits. Ticketing platforms need to take steps to combat scalping, such as strengthening identity verification and limiting the time window for retransmission. This will help protect the rights and interests of viewers while reducing illegal transactions.
In addition, the refund policy should be more reasonable and flexible to take into account the emergency situations that spectators may face. A tiered refund scheme can be a solution that makes refunds a viable option, while the platform can charge a fee to cover the loss.
Finally, in order to protect the rights and interests of true fans, show organizers and ticketing platforms need to find ways to ensure that they can get tickets at a reasonable price. This may include more fan-only pre-sales and other measures to reduce the impact of scalpers and daigous.
Overall, the issue of concert ticket refunds reminds us that we need to think more and improve in terms of real-name ticket purchase policies, e-ticket technology and refund policies, so as to establish a more fair and transparent performance market, which can not only protect the interests of performance organizers, but also safeguard the rights and interests of audiences.
The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.