If something goes wrong, there must be a demon, who is overturning the case for the Cultural Revolution
The Cultural Revolution: Historical Review and Questioning of Reality
Nearly half a century has passed since the Cultural Revolution, the political movement that shook Chinese history. However, the evaluation of the Cultural Revolution has been the focus of controversy for a long time. Looking back at history, we find that this political turmoil not only attracted widespread attention at home and abroad at the time, but also still touches people's nerves today. In this article, we will explore the historical background of the Cultural Revolution, reflect on the critical voices of the past few decades, analyze the different perspectives that have emerged in recent years, and identify the figures who can overturn the Cultural Revolution, and finally articulate our negative attitude towards the Cultural Revolution.
The historical context of the Cultural Revolution is a thing of the past, but the embers still affect society today. For decades, public opinion at home and abroad has been negative about the Cultural Revolution. In 1981, a resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China became the authoritative conclusion of this historical movement, which emphasized the mistakes and sabotage of the Cultural Revolution. This resolution is not only a summary of the history of that time, but also a profound understanding of the lessons of the Cultural Revolution. However, in recent years, a number of different voices have gradually surfaced, and they have tried to reinterpret this history. Under the wave of the Internet, some people began to openly speak positively about the Cultural Revolution, even praising its alleged achievements.
This phenomenon has aroused widespread concern in society and also raised our concerns about these voices.
In the age of the Internet, the speed at which information spreads is staggering. However, the authenticity of the information is often difficult to guarantee. Recently, an online survey claimed that "people over the age of 60 who experienced the Cultural Revolution have a positive view". However, we are skeptical of this finding. This broad conclusion is hardly convincing. We wonder if there is some special motive behind this, trying to glorify the Cultural Revolution or even overturn it. We cannot afford to take such concerns lightly.
We must seriously analyze and refute these views. First of all, we should question the veracity of the so-called findings. In a complex and ever-changing social context, how can a survey represent everyone's point of view? Many people over the age of 60 around us, including myself, were negative about the Cultural Revolution. We doubt that there is a serious selectivity bias in this survey. Second, for those who praise the Cultural Revolution, we should examine whether there is a political motive behind their views. Some people who were dissatisfied with the reform and opening up tried to turn their attention to the Cultural Revolution in an attempt to express their dissatisfaction.
This kind of retrogressive thinking is a misreading of history and, more importantly, a misjudgment of the development of the times.
In addition to this, we also need to identify those behind the reversal of the Cultural Revolution. Lin Biao, the remnants of the Gang of Four, and some people who are dissatisfied with reform and opening up may become the driving force behind the reversal of the Cultural Revolution. These people are trying to erase the scars of history and the profound disasters brought to Chinese society by the Cultural Revolution. Their attempt to glorify the Cultural Revolution and cover up the truth of history is a great disrespect to history and an irresponsibility to all those who lost their lives in the Cultural Revolution.
To sum up, we have a firm negative attitude towards the Cultural Revolution. History cannot be tampered with, and the Cultural Revolution was a great tragedy in Chinese history, which brought great harm to Chinese society. We cannot ignore history, let alone forget it. Any attempt to beautify or overturn the Cultural Revolution is irresponsible to history and disrespectful to those innocent lives. We call for history to return to history and for the truth to be passed on unmistakably. Only a true and objective understanding of history can enable us to move forward better and move towards a brighter future.
Chairman Mao was seriously ill, Jiang Qing came to visit, Chairman: You bring Zhang Yufeng, I have something to tell her
In the 70s of the last century, Chairman Mao's health began to deteriorate, and it was a moment full of drama and historical significance. Chairman Mao was getting weaker by old age and illness, but it was at this time that Jiang Qing came to visit Chairman Mao, and this incident became the focus of political attention at that time.
Jiang Qing's arrival triggered a series of interesting episodes. Chairman Mao conveyed a message through Zhang Yufeng, he asked Jiang Qing to pay for the manuscript. This may seem like a bit unexpected, but it has profound implications. Chairman Mao did not just ask for manuscript fees, but used this opportunity to convey two meanings.
First of all, Chairman Mao's request emphasized the idea of advocating diligence and thrift. Chairman Mao advocated diligence and thrift and simplicity throughout his life, and he once again emphasized this value by asking for manuscript fees. This is a kind of education for Jiang Qing, reminding her not to be too extravagant and extravagant.
Second, Chairman Mao's request also contains a deeper meaning. He tried to observe Jiang Qing's attitude and reaction through this request. Jiang Qing is Chairman Mao's wife, but she has also been seen as a political careerist. Chairman Mao may have wanted to use this seemingly simple request to find out whether Jiang Qing truly understood his political philosophy and legacy, and whether she was willing to continue to adhere to the core values that Chairman Mao represented.
Jiang Qing showed her own triple consideration in the face of this request. First of all, as a husband and wife, she may feel a special affection for Chairman Mao, not just a political relationship. Second, she may see this as a temptation to understand Chairman Mao's true intentions and attitudes. Finally, she is also observing Chairman Mao's dynamics, wanting to know whether he still has political authority in the last days of his life.
However, Chairman Mao's warning does not seem to have been understood by Jiang Qing. She smiled and left after accepting the manuscript fee, as if she did not seriously think about the meaning of Chairman Mao.
This may indicate that Jiang Qing did not care about Chairman Mao's teachings, and that she may be clinging to her political ambitions and lavish lifestyle.
Soon after, on September 9, 1976, Chairman Mao unfortunately passed away, and the whole country was immersed in deep grief. Chairman Mao's death marked the end of an era in which the country lost a great leader. This moment became an important turning point in China's history, marking a change in the political landscape.
Shortly after Chairman Mao's death, another shocking event occurred. Zhang Yufeng helped Jiang Qing to the portrait of Chairman Mao, and they took pictures.
The scene reflects Jiang Qing's close ties to Chairman Mao, but it also shows Jiang Qing's ambitions, as she seems trying to occupy the political high ground at this critical moment.
However, Jiang Qing's political career did not last long. Soon after, in October, the state smashed the political group known as the Gang of Four, and Jiang Qing was arrested and imprisoned. The incident marked the end of Jiang Qing's political career, and with it, her power and ambitions vanished.
Through this historical episode, we can see the complex interaction between Chairman Mao and Jiang Qing. Chairman Mao tried to convey a profound meaning through simple requests, warning Jiang Qing to advocate diligence and thrift and not to go to extremes.
The 14,000 volunteer prisoners of war who went to Taiwan were not cut off from wanting to return to the mainland
I. Beginning - Historical background to the end of the Korean War and the signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement
In 1953, the Korean War came to an end, and the participating countries signed the Korean Armistice Agreement. However, the end of the war does not mean that everything is smooth, and this article will take you to take an in-depth look at the story behind the end of the Korean War, as well as the misfortunes of a group of volunteer prisoners of war who suffered in silence.
II. U.S. Manipulation: The Question of the Return of Prisoners of War
In the Korean Armistice Agreement, the issue of prisoners of war was highly controversial. Zhou Enlai advocated a fair settlement of the prisoner of war issue, but the United States resorted to tricks and only returned some of the prisoners of war, which makes people doubt and worry.
III. Chiang Kai-shek's government involved in the Korean War
Even more surprising was the involvement of Chiang Kai-shek's government in the Korean War. The U.S. military worked closely with Taiwan's Kuomintang government, and Kuomintang officers actively assisted in the war, an act that aroused international concern and even reached a secret agreement with India.
IV. CIA-Chiang Kai-shek Collaboration
Against this backdrop, CIA agent Toft approached Chiang Kai-shek in the hope of assisting China in transporting much-needed medicines. However, Chiang Kai-shek's promise to dispatch the Kuomintang navy led to the seizure of medical supplies, which caused great distress to the volunteers.
V. Shameless Chiang Kai-shek
Chiang Kai-shek's practice was seen as piracy in defiance of international law, which caused huge losses to the volunteer soldiers. The act sparked widespread condemnation.
VI. Return of prisoners of war to Taiwan
It is worth mentioning that the return of prisoners of war to Taiwan is not only a humanitarian measure, but also a chess move aimed at containing China's rise. This competition is not limited to the battlefield, but also extends to the diplomatic, economic, and political spheres.
VII. What happened to the volunteer prisoners of war
The plight of the volunteer prisoners of war was extremely harsh. Their quality of life is extremely poor, and they have to endure not only manual labor, but also food shortages.
At the same time, the South Koreans and the Kuomintang bullied and mistreated the prisoners of war, making their situation even worse.
VIII. The Kuomintang's Means
Kuomintang agents tried to influence the volunteer fighters through propaganda, however, the determined volunteer fighters resolutely rejected these attempts. The agents even tried to tattoo the prisoners of war in an attempt to break their will, but they all failed.
IX. Restitution and Massacre
After the end of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the issue of the return of prisoners of war became particularly important. Kuomintang agents set up the so-called "Mainland Disaster Relief Association", but behind it there was an unspeakable massacre, which is a scar of history that can never be forgotten.
X. The Return of Hope
It was not until 1987, when relations between Chinese mainland and Taiwan began to ease, that POWs were allowed to return to their home countries. The Chinese government has provided them with shelter and assistance, worked hard to eliminate historical problems, and rekindled their hopes.
XI. Inner scars
However, this history caused deep psychological trauma to the prisoners of war of the Volunteers, and the shameless behavior of the Chiang Kai-shek government has become an eternal scar in their hearts, as well as a pillar of shame in history, an indelible painful memory.
In this deep and true story, we see the hidden truth and the pathos of history behind it.