The 28 incident has become a war of words, no longer just a discussion of the incident itself, but also a tool for all parties to live broadcast goods. In this case, it is indeed necessary to consider a network-wide blocking method. However, before deciding to block, there are a number of factors that need to be considered in depth, including freedom of expression, online governance, and the best way to resolve disputes.
First, freedom of expression is an important value in a democratic society. While some livestreaming phenomena may spark public discontent, blocking operations need to be handled carefully to ensure that people's freedom of expression is not violated. Freedom of expression is key to ensuring pluralism and diversity in society, and action must therefore be taken without violating this principle.
Second, network governance is a complex issue. Blocking can be controversial because deciding when and how to block is subjective. Therefore, any blocking decision should be based on clear laws, regulations and procedures to ensure fairness and transparency. This also requires effective communication between governments, internet platforms and the public to work together to develop appropriate rules.
In addition, the best way to resolve disputes may not be through blocking, but through dialogue and negotiation. The ban could inflame the controversy and further antagonize the parties. On the contrary, through an open and rational dialogue, it is possible to better understand the positions of each party and work to find solutions to problems. This requires the joint efforts of all sectors of society, including governments, internet platforms, social organizations and the public.
Finally, the issue of bringing rhythm online and accumulating money on the Internet does require reflection and regulation. But finding solutions requires a more integrated approach, including enhanced legal, regulatory, and enforcement to ensure a healthier and more orderly internet environment. This requires the cooperation of governments, internet platforms and the public to address this issue.
On the whole, blocking operations are indeed a way to deal with problems, but it needs to be considered comprehensively in many aspects such as freedom of expression, online governance, and dispute resolution. Before taking a blocking action, you should ensure that it is legal, transparent and fair, and consider whether there is a better way to solve the problem. Only through an integrated approach can we better deal with the problems on the Internet and maintain social harmony and stability.