Life is difficult, but rural children lose themselves for the luxury and enjoyment of the moment. This is undoubtedly a mistake of the show, but it is more a reflection on the way children are educated and raised in the current society.
Wang Honglin's example has sparked widespread discussion in society. On the one hand, some people believe that this format of programming may destroy the original values and lifestyles of rural children, make them pursue material enjoyment too much, and lead to distortion of the heart. On the other hand, some people believe that this way of exchanging lives can help children broaden their horizons, learn to be grateful, and cherish life.
This opposing view actually reflects the current society's concern for the gap between the rich and the poor and the difference between urban and rural areas. The purpose of the show is good, and it wants to allow children to experience different lives through identity exchange, and cultivate their compassion and gratitude. But the manner and results of implementation are embarrassing.
Children in rural areas, because they live in poverty for a long time, are full of curiosity and yearning for urban life. And urban children, because they are too pampered, have an incredible fear of rural life. When the two exchange identities, there will undoubtedly be many difficulties.
But the crux of the matter is that the exchange is temporary, and the children eventually have to return to their own lives. Urban children can return to a comfortable living environment, while rural children have to face their previous lives again. This kind of separation and contrast will undoubtedly bring great psychological pressure to rural children.
So, what do we think of this kind of show? Should it be completely negated, or should it be improved? This requires us to think deeply.
First of all, we should recognize that any format of programming has its advantages and disadvantages. The starting point of "Metamorphosis" is good, and it hopes to help children establish a correct outlook on life and values in this way. However, in the process of implementation, there may be some external factors that lead to the deviation of the program.
Secondly, we should see that children's hearts are very fragile and need our hearts to take care of. Whether they are urban children or rural children, they are the hope of the future and deserve our care and love.
Finally, society should provide a healthier and more balanced direction for such programming. It should not only pursue ratings and topics, but more consideration should be given to the physical and mental health of children.
Conclusion: "Metamorphosis" reveals a fact for us, that is, in today's society, the gap between urban and rural areas is still a problem that cannot be ignored. As every member of society, we should take action to eliminate this gap for the sake of our children and a better future, so that every child can grow up healthy and happy.