The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
On the international stage, friendship and hostility often ebb and flow, one moment like brothers, the next saber rattling. The most recent example is when Britain and France fell in love at the G7 summit, but in the blink of an eye, a dispute over fishing rights in Jersey pushed them to the brink of bitter confrontation.
The incident began earlier this month when British Prime Minister Boris Johnson ordered restrictions on the number of French fishing boats in Jersey waters in support of British fishermen. The French protested, arguing that Britain had violated a previously signed agreement, but the British government argued that the agreement had lapsed because of Brexit. The dispute has heightened tensions on both sides.
French President Emmanuel Macron has taken a hard line, threatening to cut off the electricity supply to Jersey, which gets 90 percent of its electricity from France. The British government did not show weakness and sent warships to the waters of Jersey, and even British sailors landed at Elizabeth's Castle in Jersey to shoot and demonstrate against France. These actions led to a fury throughout France, triggering a dangerous standoff.
During the confrontation, British fishing boats rammed French fishing boats, further angering the French. Some French even called on the government to prepare for a naval war with Britain, which responded that it would be the second "Battle of Trafalgar", mocking the defeat in French history.
Although the dispute began over Jersey fishing rights, it has evolved into a full-blown confrontation between Britain and France, raising international concerns. French President Emmanuel Macron warned Britain that if Britain does not withdraw its warships, France will bring back the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which is cruising in the Indian Ocean, thereby disrupting joint US exercises in the South and East China Seas.
This incident highlighted the conflicts of interest and contradictions between Western countries. Although Britain and France were once wrongdoers, they were united in the face of common threats. However, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the collapse of the colonial empire, Britain and France refocused on individual interests rather than solidarity.
After Brexit, the contradictions between Britain and France have increased significantly, and the United States has also tried to divide the EU. This is significant good news for China, as the European Union has followed the U.S. policy of isolating and sanctioning China. Now, the Anglo-French dispute distracts the EU, possibly even the United States, creating opportunities for China to improve its external environment.
In this drama of international relations, friendship and interests are always intertwined, there are no eternal friends, there are no eternal enemies, only eternal interests.
Revelation:
This latest Anglo-French dispute reminds us of the reality of the international community: friendship between nations is often based on profit, not eternity. Britain and France, once rivals, are once long rivals, and are once again at strained over fishing rights. This tells us about the complexity of international politics, where friendship and hostility can change in an instant.
The dispute also highlights the importance of international agreements. Britain believes the deal is scrapped because of Brexit, while France insists it works. This shows that international contracts need to be clearly defined and must be respected by both parties, otherwise disputes will escalate.
Another revelation is that disputes between States can trigger chain reactions. The dispute has involved the global strategic layout of the United States, which once again underscores the intricacies of international relations, and the decisions of one country can have a profound impact on others.
Summary:
The dispute between Britain and France over fishing rights is a microscopic case in international politics, but the lessons and implications cannot be underestimated. First, the incident once again underscored that the relationship between enemies and enemies among States in the international community is often based on interests. Although Britain and France have been rivals in the past, they can also be allies, depending on the interests and circumstances of the moment.
Second, the importance of international agreements has been highlighted. The dispute between Britain and France involved agreements signed by both parties, and how to interpret and implement these agreements became the focus of the dispute. This underscores the need for international contracts to be clear and enforceable, and that both parties should abide by the agreement to avoid escalation of disputes.
Above all, the intricacies of international relations. This dispute has involved the global strategic layout of the United States, once again showing that a country's decision can have a profound impact on the global pattern. International politics, therefore, is not just a struggle between States, but also involves international cooperation and complex political interaction.
For China, the dispute presents an opportunity for China to divide the Western camp, reduce international pressure, and improve the external environment. However, China also needs to recognize that international politics is full of variables and needs to be cautious, flexible and adhere to international laws and agreements in order to maintain peace and stability in the international community.
The Anglo-French dispute also offers China an important lesson that changes in international politics and relations are unpredictable. Therefore, China needs to have a solid foreign policy and strong international relations to cope with various situations.
In international affairs, China should continue to advocate and actively support the observance of international law and agreements. This will not only help China establish a good reputation in the international community, but also help maintain international peace and stability. China can play a constructive role by actively participating in international organizations, putting forward constructive initiatives and resolving disputes, and become a responsible major country in the international community.
In addition, China needs to remain vigilant and understand the dynamics of international politics. International relations can change dramatically in a rapidly changing world, so China needs to be able to respond to a variety of situations. This includes a more flexible foreign policy, as well as strengthening domestic power to better defend its interests in international affairs.
Finally, China can also learn some lessons from the Anglo-French dispute to avoid getting into unnecessary disputes with other countries. Respect for international agreements and international law and the settlement of disputes through diplomatic means can help to avoid the escalation of tensions and also contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security.
In sum, the Anglo-French dispute provides an important case on international politics and international relations, highlighting the complexity and variables of the international community. China can draw lessons from this in order to better cope with international challenges, safeguard its own interests and make positive contributions to international peace and stability. In a volatile international environment, it is China's wise move to adhere to international law and agreements and actively participate in international affairs.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.