Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you more participation, thank you for your support.
News 1: Suddenly, Israel moved, but did not hit Gaza, but first bombed Syria, and the Iranian foreign minister escaped
While speculation was made about a possible large-scale Israeli attack on Gaza, Israel took the unexpected step of blowing up Syria's Damascus International Airport and Aleppo Airport.
This decision has left many wondering why Israel chose not to hit Gaza directly, but chose to blow up the Syrian airport.
Israel's decision stemmed from concerns about negotiations between Iran and Syria. Iran's foreign minister plans to take a special plane to Syria to negotiate on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the situation in Syria.
Israel, fearing that the talks might be aimed at confronting Israel, chose to blow up Syrian airports to take a stand. There are several key factors behind this action.
First, Iran does not have a direct territorial border with Israel and Gaza, so Iran can only intervene in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through Syria.
By supplying Syria with weapons such as short-range missiles, Iran could have a deterrent effect on Israel, which is an efficient strategy for Iran.
Israel has made it clear that it will not hesitate to take military action even if Iran deploys armed forces in Syria, which is the message it wants to convey.
Second, Russia's reduced military presence in Syria gives Israel greater freedom. While Russia has deployed troops in Syria, the reality is that Israel relies on U.S. support.
If Russia decides to intervene, this will affect the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and is also an opportunity for the United States, so Israel is not too worried about Russia's counterattack.
From another perspective, Israel's actions are also seen as a diversion tactic. The blockade and intense air strikes in Gaza have led to a humanitarian crisis and increasing international pressure.
Therefore, Israel chose to blow up the airport in Syria to divert attention from Gaza. In this way, the international community may be distracted and reduce the pressure on international public opinion on Gaza.
However, Israel's actions have also raised international moral questions. The sudden airstrikes on two important airports of a sovereign state, without warning or declaration of war, have been described as terrorist attacks on an international level.
This makes Israel inevitably condemned by the international community.
Israel's toughness and fearlessness of the hatred that can be brought about are also topics discussed in the article. Israel is known as the "little bully" of the Middle East, and although the nickname sounds powerful, it also means that Israel has accumulated a lot of enemies.
More oppression will only bring more hatred, which is a factor that cannot be ignored in the situation in the Middle East.
While support from the United States is a powerful credential for Israel, the United States, as a hegemonic power, cannot provide it with all-round support forever.
Israel will face new challenges when one day the United States is no longer able or willing to support Israel. At that time, Israel's willingness to seek reconciliation or cooperation with its surrounding countries and regions became an important question.
In general, Israel's decision to choose to blow up Syrian airfields caused widespread concern and discussion. The incident underscored the complexity and tension in the Middle East.
While Israel has the support of the United States on the international stage, it must also carefully consider the possible consequences of its actions and how it will handle its relations with neighboring countries in the future.
Peace and stability in the Middle East are essential to global security, and all parties should strive to avoid the escalation of the conflict in order to find a peaceful solution.
News 2: The United States sided with Israel, and many people realized one thing: this is a bureau, and Ukraine may have no way out
On October 7, 2023, a new conflict broke out in the Middle East, with Hamas firing a large number of rockets at Israel.
The conflict has attracted widespread attention from the international community, but it has also had far-reaching consequences, especially for the policies of Ukraine and the United States.
Back in 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the launch of a special military operation against Ukraine, pushing the Eastern European country into the quagmire of war.
Western countries, including the United States, have expressed their support for Ukraine. However, the cost of weaponry and materiel required by front-line troops is staggering, exceeding the capacity of Western support.
Faced with this situation, the US government seeks to bypass Congress and provide support directly to Ukraine. However, it was at this critical moment that a new conflict broke out in the Middle East and Hamas attacked Israel.
Israel is a state made up of Jews, and American politics has Jewish capitalist influence behind it. As a result, the United States has had to shift the focus of aid to Israel, making Ukraine appear to be the outcast.
Some analysts believe that this Middle East conflict may be the result of a political maneuver by the United States in order to provide a reason to withdraw from Ukraine. But whether this view holds is debatable.
The war in Ukraine has been going on for almost two years, and various kinds of aid have continued to flow, but the war situation has not improved substantially. Social contradictions in European countries are also becoming increasingly acute, as most of the money goes to the Ukrainian battlefield and is not used to solve domestic problems.
There is a similar fiscal crisis in the United States, which cannot continue to provide large-scale support.
The timing of the outbreak of the conflict in the Middle East is indeed doubtful. In this case, will the United States really get out of the situation at the expense of Ukraine? This question is not easy to answer.
Political or not, the Middle East conflict poses challenges to U.S. policy and the situation in Ukraine.
First, the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East has led to confrontation between Israel and Hamas, and has provoked anger in the Arab world.
This is not in the interest of the U.S. government, much less the Jewish capitalists behind its politics. Therefore, the conflict in the Middle East is not the situation that the United States Government wants.
In addition, before the conflict began, the United States tried to promote the establishment of diplomatic relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, but after the conflict broke out, Saudi Arabia quickly interrupted diplomatic negotiations.
This has wasted U.S. diplomatic efforts. Therefore, it seems unreasonable for the United States to choose to provoke contradictions between Israel and the Arab world at this critical moment.
In general, the conflict in the Middle East does have an impact on the policy of Ukraine and the United States, but the existence of the cicada shelling program is inconclusive. The conflict in the Middle East has made Ukraine a secondary target for Western support and has triggered a series of policy considerations by the US government.
However, the real dilemma can be more complicated. The U.S. government and the forces behind its politics may not sacrifice stability in the Middle East to get rid of Ukraine.
The conflict in the Middle East is a complex issue with multiple intertwined interests, and its resolution requires careful reflection and comprehensive consideration of the interests of all parties. Ultimately, time will tell the truth, and we will see the long-term impact of this conflict on the global situation and on Ukraine.
News 3: In order to escape the war, the Ukrainian mother-in-law was picked up by the Chinese son-in-law to settle down, shouting: This is a fairy tale world
Love is a beautiful bond that transcends borders and cultures, while peace is the world's most precious asset.
In an era of strife and turmoil, we often forget the preciousness of peace, but in a sincere love story, we can find a new understanding of peace.
This is the story of Viagra and Alyona. Viagra, a native of Shandong, has never been interested in traveling abroad because he feels that the great rivers and mountains of his homeland are worth exploring.
However, God arranged for him a trip abroad, a journey that not only changed his life, but also brought us a beautiful story of transnational love.
In 2016, Viagra accepted an invitation from a friend to travel to Ukraine. Although the situation in foreign countries was not peaceful at that time, Viagra friends repeatedly invited him and finally convinced him.
Viagra's trip abroad was not smooth, but it became the beginning of his love story.
In Ukraine, Viagra met the Ukrainian beauty Alyona. They were initially friends, but Alona showed a keen interest in Chinese culture.
This shared cultural interest became a bond of mutual attraction between them. Viagra became Alena's Chinese teacher, and they began to communicate and share each other's culture. Love quietly warms up in this process of mutual learning and understanding.
However, the reality is not always as it should be. Viagra's visa expired and he had to return to China. Although the two were separated by thousands of miles, they kept in touch.
Their feelings developed rapidly, and despite living in different countries, they decided to face the challenge bravely. So, in 2017, Viagra and Alyona entered the palace of marriage, and their love journey officially began.
This love story is not only the struggle of two people, but also includes the important role of the family. Viagra and Alyona have a lovely daughter who hopes to take the child home to visit her parents while allowing them to meet their daughter-in-law and granddaughter.
However, the world has changed. With the outbreak, travel has been restricted and planning has become difficult. Just as they were planning to return to Ukraine to visit relatives, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict broke out, further complicating the situation. These challenges require them to show tenacity and courage.
While they were facing difficulties, Alyona offered to return to Ukraine to accompany her mother, who feared for her safety during the war. However, her mother-in-law worries that her hometown is now too dangerous and does not want to put her children at risk.
At this moment, the complex issues of love, family and international relations are intertwined.
Viagra offered to let her mother-in-law come to China, but she refused. Although not because of dislike of China, but out of concern. She worries about leaving her hometown for years, about language barriers, about the inconvenience of travel, and about visa problems.
The concerns were understandable, but Viagra and Alyona persuaded her, came up with a solution, and eventually persuaded her to come to China. This decision fully demonstrates the power of love and affection, as well as the warmth of international friendship.
After her mother-in-law came to China, her journey became colorful. She tasted Chinese cuisine and toured places of interest in Beijing, Shandong, Shanghai and other places.
Her experience on China's high-speed train also impressed her, and this new thing shocked her. Her beauty and strength are deeply touching, and her participation allows her to experience Chinese culture and life more deeply.
This multinational family explored China together, sharing love and affection. Despite the language barrier between them, they communicate with their actions and smiles, expressing warmth and kindness.
She was impressed by China's food, culture and landscape, describing it as a fairytale world.
Her exclamation made us realize how precious a peaceful and happy life is, and the peaceful living environment in China is the dream of countless foreigners.
Disclaimer: The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.