The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Confession of a British general: The truth about the Hong Kong issue
On July 1, 1997, the Chinese national anthem was played in Hong Kong, marking the return of Hong Kong, and the century-long wandering finally ended, and this day became a day of celebration for the Chinese people. In faraway Britain, however, a very different scene unfolded on the streets of London, with people marching angrily to protest Hong Kong's return. They did not understand why the mighty Britain wanted to return Hong Kong to China, a discontent that lasted for three years. However, a British admiral said something in a speech that changed everything and stopped them from shouting "Hong Kong".
The origins of the Hong Kong issue can be traced back to the history of ancient China. The Hong Kong area has been documented as early as the pre-Qin period, and Lü Buwei's "Lü's Spring and Autumn" refers to it as the land of a hundred yue. After the Qin Dynasty unified China, Hong Kong officially became part of Chinese territory. With the changes of history, Hong Kong gradually developed into a prosperous city and became a transit point for foreign trade during the Qing Dynasty.
However, in the early 19th century, Britain launched the Opium War, forcing the Qing Dynasty to cede Hong Kong Island to Britain through the Treaty of Nanjing. Subsequently, through the Treaty of Beijing, Britain acquired leases for Kowloon and the New Territories for a period of 99 years. Although the Qing government tried to reclaim Hong Kong several times, Britain's powerful power made this wish impossible.
After many negotiations, the British agreed to return Hong Kong in 1984, and finally completed the handover on July 1, 1997. However, the decision sparked widespread opposition and protests in the UK, with many people not understanding why Hong Kong should be returned to China.
It wasn't until 2000 that a British general's words changed people's opinions. In a military theory class, students discussed the Hong Kong issue, arguing that Britain should not give up Hong Kong, which was an act of "losing power and humiliating the country". However, the admiral's words silenced everyone: "If we do not return Hong Kong, then may I ask you, who wants to fight with me against the People's Liberation Army?" "No one dared to respond, because they knew that there was no chance of victory against the Chinese People's Liberation Army."
The words of the British general reveal a reality: the strength of the Chinese army. With its firm will and combat effectiveness, China defeated the United Nations forces, including Britain, in the Korean War. This war demonstrated the firm determination and strength of the Chinese army and let the world see the strength of the Chinese army.
Therefore, the British government finally decided to return Hong Kong, avoiding possible conflicts and losses. This also shows that the issue of national sovereignty is non-negotiable, and China is willing to solve the problem through peaceful means, but will not back down.
At the moment of Hong Kong's return to the motherland, the five-star red flag was raised, and the hearts of the Chinese people were surging. Hong Kong's return is not only a defense of the country's territorial integrity, but also a symbol of China's rise. Hong Kong's prosperity will continue to drive the development of the mainland, and the two will reinforce each other to achieve the rejuvenation and rise of the country.
At this historic moment, we should remember the greatness of the country, be grateful for the strength of the motherland, and cherish the time of peace and stability. China's rise is unstoppable, and we must unite to jointly realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.