The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
An unexpected event, a kind young man, and a family deeply imprisoned. The past misjudgments and corrupt practices are finally revealed under the pursuit of justice, although the process is difficult, but fairness and justice will come sooner or later.
On a cold winter day on December 15, 2014, Zhao Jianping, executive vice president of the Inner Mongolia High People's Court, went to Huugjiltu's parents' home with a sincere apology: "I'm sorry." This short sentence carries 18 years of waiting and pain behind it. Huugjiltu's parents cried with a headache, and their son was finally acquitted, but his life was forever fixed at the age of 18.
Huugjiltu, an ordinary young man from Inner Mongolia, was caught up in a storm of wrong cases for a good deed. In 1996, he found the body of a woman in a toilet and immediately called the police. However, the police at the time improperly identified Huugjiltu as the murderer and brought him back to the police station, preparing to force him to confess his crime.
The atmosphere in the police station at that time was tense, and everyone thought that the case was difficult to solve. Feng Zhiming, the deputy director of the sub-bureau at the time, decided to close the case in a short time in order to keep his reputation as a "detective". He chose to concoct a murderer for Huugjiltu. Feng Zhiming resorted to harsh interrogation methods, causing Huugjiltu to change his confession overnight.
Feng Zhiming did not know that his interrogation methods had already aroused the suspicion of the outside world. He was suspended due to an accident during a trial, but he did not relent and continued to chase fame and achievement.
Huugjiltu's parents wanted to visit their son, but were refused. On May 17, 1996, the Hohhot Intermediate People's Court sentenced Huugjiltu to death, and his life ended in just 61 days. Huugjiltu's mother blamed herself, believing that if she had not let her son go out to dinner that day, he would not have suffered all this.
However, Huugjiltu's parents have not given up their belief in seeking justice for their son. Despite their weak strength, they ran around trying to find evidence to prove their son's innocence. But the evidence is gone, and they are in a desperate situation.
However, fate finally favored Huugjiltu's family. In 2005, a serial rape and murder case occurred in Inner Mongolia, and the murderer Zhao Zhihong was arrested. During the interrogation, the diabolical criminal gave a detailed account of his crimes, including the circumstances of the first killing. Shockingly, the victim of the first murder was the victim in the Huugjil pattern.
The news gave Huugjiltu's family hope, but the justice system did not act quickly. Until a reporter named Tang Ji reported the incident, which attracted the attention of the higher authorities. However, although the relevant parties began to thoroughly investigate the case, all evidence has disappeared, and Zhao Zhihong's confession alone cannot completely clear Huugjiltu's guilt.
Luckily, a mysterious phone call changed everything. A prosecutor with a conscience discovery provided Huugjiltu confession, revealing the improper methods used by Feng Zhiming in the trial of Huugjiltu case. Although the evidence is clear, Huugjiltu's life is irreparable.
The case reveals the grave consequences of corruption and wrongful convictions, but also demonstrates the power of justice. Fairness and justice may come late, but they will come. The legal system should be honest and rigorous, and it should be responsible for serving the people.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.