The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
At present, the situation in the Taiwan Strait is becoming more and more unoptimistic, mainly because of the arrogance of the "Taiwan independence" forces and the interference of external forces. Against this background, more and more mainland people believe that they cannot stand idly by and tolerate the arrogant provocations of the "Taiwan independence" forces, especially the gross interference of the Western forces led by the United States in the Taiwan issue. Therefore, "reunification" has become a hot topic, and some people even call for the "military unification" of Taiwan as quickly as possible to suppress the "Taiwan independence" forces and external reactions. Although these statements are somewhat extreme, they have received a lot of support. Dr. Li Yi, a well-known expert on the Taiwan issue, has for many years insisted on "military unification" as the last guarantee for resolving the Taiwan issue. He quoted the view of Taiwanese scholar Su Qi, who believes that the time for the mainland to reunify Taiwan is short, perhaps only five years.
Born in 1961, Li Yi has studied for master's and doctoral degrees in sociology at many universities in the mainland, accumulating rich experience in the study of Taiwan issues. His views were at odds with some scholars, especially with Professor Wang Wen of Chinese Minmin University, who at that time advocated promoting "peaceful reunification" by safeguarding cross-strait relations, which was obviously in contradiction with Li Yi's "military unification" stance. At that time, Li Yi openly expressed his radical views, advocating the posture of safeguarding "military unification" and "talking peace" with the Taiwan authorities. This position has attracted widespread attention, with some questioning its bias.
Li Yi insisted that "peaceful reunification" appeared "weak" to the Taiwan authorities and "Taiwan independence" elements, and advocated taking resolute action to crack down on the arrogance of the "Taiwan independence" forces. He believes that it is difficult to predict when "peaceful reunification" will be achieved, so he advocates "armed unification" to maintain the initiative. However, in the context of the Taiwan issue at that time, this position was opposed by many scholars, because the Taiwan authorities at that time were led by Ma Ying-jeou and had a friendly stance on "peaceful reunification." Professor Wang Wen warned Li Yi to watch out for his remarks, but eventually fired him.
After leaving Chinese Minmin University, Li Yi joined the Institute of Taiwan Studies at Fuzhou University and continued to uphold his views. He stressed the necessity of "armed unification" in order to deter "Taiwan independence" elements and create conditions for "peaceful reunification." Despite the controversy of his stance, he has persevered and bravely confronted different points of view. Li Yi's persistence is appreciated by some, and his views are feasible, at least better than those scholars who are actually indifferent under the banner of "peaceful reunification." However, others believe that his remarks are too radical and could put the two sides at risk.
Recently, in an Internet program, Li Yi once again emphasized his stance, advocating rapid "military reunification" to deter "Taiwan independence" elements. The remarks caused trouble among Taiwanese scholars, who found it difficult to communicate with Mr. Li. Quoting Su Qi, Li Yi pointed out that the medium-range missile technology of the United States, Japan, and Europe is rising rapidly, and believes that there is not much time left for the mainland to reunify Taiwan, which may only be five years. However, this view remains controversial, as it is quite difficult to catch up with the continent's strength in the field of medium-range missiles in a short period of time. Although the Taiwan issue has attracted international attention, resolving it remains challenging.
To sum up, although the current situation in the Taiwan Strait is tense, it is still under the control of the mainland on the whole. The international community generally agrees with the "one-China principle", while external forces are still in a disadvantageous position in military confrontation in the Taiwan Strait region. The PLA has a leading edge in the field of medium-range missiles, while at the same time developing rapidly in other areas. In the future, whether it adopts "military unification" or "peaceful reunification", the mainland will cope with various challenges and adhere to the core interests of the country. The Taiwan issue will remain a sensitive issue in the international political arena, requiring the joint efforts of all parties to achieve a peaceful and stable solution.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.