laitimes

Li Yi made a remark on the People's Liberation Army's armed control of Taiwan

author:Careful Corey 3G2Z

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.

Lead

In today's society, some people have caused controversy with their own remarks, including Professor Li Yi from the mainland. Mr. Li, a self-described scholar, has made a series of public statements, including views on the Taiwan issue. However, these statements were not only shocking, but also caused widespread controversy. In this article, we will explore the truth behind Professor Li Yi's remarks and whether his views on the Taiwan issue are in line with the expectations and values of most people.

Li Yi made a remark on the People's Liberation Army's armed control of Taiwan

Li Yi's identity

Professor Li Yi claims to be a well-known patriot and a researcher at a research institute, but lacks publicly available biographical information. This casts doubt on the authenticity of his academic background and qualifications. Despite this, however, he frequently made radical statements on social media, claiming that China should be prepared to sacrifice a lot of people in the process of recovering Taiwan.

Disregard for life

Professor Li Yi once said in a speech: "To reunify Taiwan, China must be prepared to sacrifice 70 million to 140 million people, and it must also be prepared to sacrifice 500 cities east of Xi'an." Such indifferent rhetoric about life sparked widespread anger and disgust. He seems to have forgotten that every life has dignity and worth and should not be seen as a number to be sacrificed.

Li Yi made a remark on the People's Liberation Army's armed control of Taiwan

Inconsistencies in speech

There are obvious inconsistencies between Professor Li Yi's remarks at different times and occasions. He claimed that the 140 million sacrifices were "a piece of cake," but said in another reference to militarized Taiwan that the PLA would suffer more than double digits. This disagreement makes it difficult to believe his views and honesty.

Attitude towards the Taiwan issue

Although Professor Li Yi emphasized the "military unification" of Taiwan, in reality, this is not a simple issue. Cross-strait reunification is what every Chinese people ardently desire, but we still prefer peaceful reunification over force. We want to avoid war, because it brings suffering, loss and division. We firmly believe that through peaceful development and diplomatic efforts, a solution to the Taiwan issue can be found without resorting to extreme means.

Li Yi made a remark on the People's Liberation Army's armed control of Taiwan

The complexity of the international situation

The current international situation is very complicated, and the United States and other countries are constantly interfering in the Taiwan issue in an attempt to limit China's development. However, China adheres to the principles of national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will only resort to force when external forces explicitly infringe on China's territory. Under these circumstances, peaceful reunification remains our preferred approach.

epilogue

Professor Li Yi's remarks have sparked widespread controversy, and his indifferent attitude and radical views go against the respect and expectations of most people for life and peace. We believe that through diplomatic efforts and peaceful development, the Taiwan issue can finally find a way to resolve it without having to pay a very high price. Cross-strait reunification is an inevitable trend of historical development, and we look forward to this day, while also adhering to the country's principles and bottom line.

Li Yi made a remark on the People's Liberation Army's armed control of Taiwan

The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Read on