For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, please click "Follow", we will update wonderful stories for you every day and share different story moments!
At this moment, the situation in the world is varied, and a variety of wonderful pictures are presented on the international stage.
In today's world, China has emerged as the world's second largest economy and is steadily moving towards a bright and brilliant future.
We inherit the wisdom of the ancients, uphold the belief of "seeing differences in the same way", and are willing to contribute our own efforts to shaping the common destiny of mankind and give full play to China's unique wisdom and strength.
Message 1: China is banned from military testing? All members of the European Union stand with the United States, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: the United States fake arms control real expansion
Recently, the United States and the European Union jointly took action against China to ban direct-ascent anti-satellite missiles, which has attracted widespread attention.
As neutral observers, we will cover this incident in depth.
The first is the military operation of the United States and the European Union.
It is reported that cooperation between the two superpowers has reached unprecedented heights in the field of defense.
By banning direct-ascent anti-satellite missiles, they seek to limit China's military capabilities in space and further undermine its strategic advantage.
The decision was seen as a response to China's rise and its achievements in science and technology.
Not surprisingly, there has been great controversy in Western political circles such as Washington and Brussels.
Proponents of the move claim that the move is aimed at maintaining global security and stability and deterring China's attempts to pursue hegemony; Critics see the move as interfering with China and harming its legitimate interests.
Later, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson responded to questions about the more complex issues and intentions behind the joint action of the United States and Europe.
He said that China firmly opposes any action that attempts to deprive it of its legitimate rights and development opportunities, and urged the United States and Europe to abandon the Cold War mentality and promote constructive dialogue and cooperation.
However, the reality behind this situation is that the United States is using Europe as its own tool to contain China's development.
The United States has long viewed China's rise as a great challenge and positioned it as a major competitor.
Joining hands with the EU against China not only demonstrates the willingness and ability of the Western camp to redistribute its power on the global political stage, but also reflects the need for them to jointly meet the "Middle Age".
There is no doubt that in the process, the United States has also stepped up its intervention to pressure China in a number of areas.
From trade wars to technology blockades, from human rights criticisms to geopolitical rivalries, these measures highlight fairly clear and targeted measures to combat China's rise and address the expansion of influence.
In the face of risks and challenges brought by the external environment and new obstacles on the way forward under various restrictions, "improving strength" has become China's top priority.
This involves strengthening its own strength in the economic, scientific, technological, military and other fields and further consolidating the foundation of national development.
At the same time, we also need to seek more partners to promote the construction of a fair and balanced global governance system.
Finally, it is worth emphasizing that the adoption of such measures in the current world situation is bound to arouse widespread controversy and concern.
We call on all parties to remain calm and objective and to respect each other's interests and choices.
Only through dialogue and cooperation to resolve differences can the goal of truly sustainable and stable development be achieved.
In conclusion, the conspiracy of the United States and Europe to contain China has aroused global attention and discussion.
The complexity behind the scenes goes far beyond what the surface seems.
How to deal with various challenges in the future and explore the geopolitical landscape under the new situation will be one of the important issues in front of all aspects.
News 2: Global currencies: the dollar jumped to 46.4%, the euro plunged to 24.4%, what about the yuan?
As the impact of the pandemic continues to ferment, the global economy is facing unprecedented challenges.
At this critical juncture, the dollar demonstrated its dominance as a reserve currency and maintained its strong position.
At the same time, both the euro and the renminbi have suffered different degrees of blows and play an important role in the international exchange rate market.
Let's start with the dollar.
As one of the world's most important reserve currencies, the US dollar has performed well under the impact of the epidemic.
Although the U.S. mainland has also been severely affected, its economy is showing strong signs of recovery and attracting significant capital inflows.
Investors spoke highly of the US government's aggressive fiscal stimulus measures and loose monetary policy, and turned funds to the dollar to hedge their money.
The "enclave effect" makes the dollar the most stable, liquid and safe option in the current market.
In contrast, the European region faces many difficulties.
Many European countries are in a deep downturn, and the eurozone economy is weak.
Moreover, differences among EU member States have exacerbated instability throughout the region.
This situation further affected the exchange rate of the euro, causing it to trend downward against the dollar.
The renminbi plays an increasingly important role in the global monetary system.
As the world's second largest economy and a major trading country, China has actively promoted the internationalization of the RMB and achieved remarkable results.
Despite the impact of the epidemic on China's economy, China has achieved relatively stable growth through timely and effective prevention and control and resumption of work and production policies.
This also keeps the RMB relatively stable and has good market expectations.
However, in the current situation, sovereign currencies face common challenges: the risk of stagflation and energy shortages.
The Fed's easing policy to stimulate economic development may trigger inflationary pressures; At the same time, due to the heightened global energy supply tension, the rise in crude oil prices will put additional pressure on national economies.
In general, there is a monetary game in the global economic landscape.
The strength of the US dollar and the challenges facing the euro and the renminbi all reflect the different policies and measures adopted by countries in response to the impact of the pandemic.
However, regardless of the currency, in this special period, it is necessary to pay close attention to market changes and flexibly adjust its strategy to maintain economic stability.
As a result, we can see that the global monetary system is in a period of turbulence, challenges, but also opportunities.
Only through cooperation, consultation and openness can we jointly address the difficulties and risks facing the global economy and achieve economic recovery and long-term development.
News 3: If you don't have money, ask China for it? Cambodia eats China! Hun Sen shouted for China to donate $200 million
Recently, the Cambodian government suddenly made a request for a donation of up to $200 million to China, which caused widespread controversy and discussion.
For a long time, China has been one of Cambodia's most important economic partners and has given the country a lot of economic support and assistance.
However, the hard-line approach to the request has led to deep thinking about the motives behind China's generosity.
As a developing country, Cambodia has relied on external assistance for decades to build its own economy.
Since 2010, according to statistics, its GDP growth rate has remained above 7% on average, and it has made significant progress.
Much of this stems from the close and solid cooperation with China.
However, after a series of "demands" for funds from China, various excuses such as "manufacturing cities" projects and infrastructure construction have gradually aroused suspicion and antipathy.
In particular, the huge $200 million request has led ordinary people to question China's aid policies.
Whether Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen's borrowing request can get a positive response from China has become another key focus of the incident.
Over the past few years, however, China has taken a more cautious and cautious approach to external assistance.
Reducing funding for countries such as Cambodia may be one of the future trends.
This has further sparked discussion among netizens about China's long-term large amount of aid to other countries.
While there is no denying economic growth and social stability in many developing countries, controversial topics such as debt problems and high-interest loans have also arisen.
Therefore, there are calls to stop or adjust existing foreign policies and to re-examine current responsibilities and obligations.
From this point of view, at a time when globalization is advancing rapidly and countries are becoming more and more closely connected, the essence of "donation" is gradually being emphasized.
Rather than just pursuing the quantitative stacking of "good deeds", it is more about cost-effectiveness and sustainability.
Assistance objectives can only be truly achieved through sound planning, transparent operation and ensuring a balance of interests between the two sides.
In short, Cambodia's request for China to provide huge funds again has aroused widespread attention and discussion.
This has led to a re-examination of the motives behind China's foreign aid policy and a deeper reflection on its long-term effects.
In any case, at the dawn of globalization, it is necessary not only for countries to help and cooperate with each other, but also to evaluate aid behavior more rationally and pursue a win-win model
News 4: Japan wants to appeal China! The International Atomic Energy Agency has said that it will ensure that the last drop of nuclear sewage is discharged
Recently, the Japanese government's Fukushima nuclear sewage discharge plan has aroused great concern and strong controversy in the international community.
Despite opposition and skepticism, the Japanese government is determined to move forward with the plan and accuses China of obstructing the discharge of nuclear wastewater, further complicating the problem.
The first is the background to the Fukushima nuclear sewage discharge plan.
Since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident caused by the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami in 2011, large amounts of radiation have been released into the air, soil and oceans.
In order to solve the problem of nuclear sewage, which seriously plagued Japan, the Japanese government decided to discharge part of the treated waste liquid directly into the Pacific Ocean.
However, before this decision was implemented, it was met with concern and opposition from many countries and people around the world.
They are concerned about the unforeseen and long-term effects of this approach and call for safer and more viable solutions.
In particular, China, as one of its neighbors, played an important role in this incident.
The Chinese government has expressed firm opposition to Japan's nuclear effluent discharge plan and has taken measures to restrict seafood imports from Japan.
The move caused displeasure among the Japanese government, which threatened to file a case at the WTO over the matter.
In the international community, many countries and people support China's position against Japan's nuclear sewage discharge.
There are concerns about potential threats to global ecosystems, fishery resources and human health and security.
As a highly connected global village, all countries regard the Fukushima nuclear wastewater issue as a common concern and call for respect for the principles of science, transparency and cooperation to solve this difficult problem.
Notably, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which plays a regulatory role on the issue, has been widely questioned.
Some argue that it relies too heavily on technical factors and ignores non-technical factors such as public participation and ecological environmental impact, and loses its neutrality and authority.
In response to this incident, large-scale protests broke out around the world.
Millions of people took to the streets to demand that the Japanese government end its plans to discharge nuclear wastewater and find safer and more viable solutions.
These protests have taken place not only in Japan, but also in Asia, Europe and the Americas.
In the face of such a wide range of opposition and pressure, the Japanese Government should seriously consider the concerns of all parties and change its original position.
"This article is only published in the headlines, articles on other platforms are counterfeit"
It is imperative to work together to develop a solution that meets scientific, safety and environmental standards through active cooperation and consultation with other countries.
Overall, against the backdrop of widespread controversy over the Fukushima effluent discharge plan, the international community has called for a responsible approach to the issue.
Only by respecting scientific knowledge, communicating and basing ourselves on the interests of humanity can we achieve long-term and stable solutions.
We look forward to all parties involved sitting down and revisiting the plan and making rational choices to protect the planet we all share.
"This article is only published in the headlines, articles on other platforms are counterfeit"
Note: The original is not easy, plagiarism and manuscript washing will be deeply studied. The picture comes from the Internet, if the infringement please contact to delete.