Generative AI for efficient test data generation and management

Imagine a painter ready to create a masterpiece, but is limited to a limited palette. Can they create beautiful works? Of course! This is very similar to the world of software testing, where we do not have access to diverse and rich test data. Fortunately, generative AI can be a game-changer in this situation.

Generative AI is like an art student, observing, absorbing, and then recreating paintings that can compete with the work of experienced painters. This AI learns patterns in the input data and then generates new data that mimics those patterns. As an added benefit, it can be trained to adhere to governance, privacy, security, or ethical guidelines that prevent the use of raw data.

Understanding Generative AI and Synthetic Data Generative AI is a subfield of AI, like a creative apprentice. It learns patterns in the input data and then produces new data that is similar to those patterns. Synthetic data is data that is created and produced in close mimicry the characteristics of the original data.

Fraud Detection with Generative AI: A Case Study Imagine Alpha, a financial institution, developing a fraud detection system — a system trained on machine learning models to distinguish between fraudulent and legitimate transactions. To train this model effectively, they need a large and diverse dataset that is sufficiently representative of both types of transactions.

In fact, fraudulent transactions are like finding a needle in a pile, they are very rare. Therefore, generating a real-world dataset containing a large number of fraudulent transactions is difficult. Governance and ethical constraints can further increase and limit the data available for training the model.

Therefore, training on such a dataset may result in a system that performs well at predicting legitimate transactions but fails to identify fraudulent ones. This bias against most categories (legitimate transactions) is a common problem known as "category imbalance".

Generative AI comes in handy This is where generative AI comes into play. Suppose that in a dataset of one million transactions, only 1,000 are fraudulent. Generative AI models can be trained on this dataset to identify the characteristics of fraud and legitimate transactions.

Once properly trained, the model can generate synthetic transactions that closely match real transactions. A distinctive feature of generative AI is that it can be instructed to generate data at a specific scale. In this case, AI can generate a dataset containing both fraudulent and non-fraudulent transactions. This new synthetic dataset, rich in fraudulent transactions, closely mimics real-world situations.

By training on this dataset, fraud detection systems are less susceptible to bias and more able to identify fraudulent and non-fraudulent transactions because the data sets are balanced.

Real Impact By using generative AI to create a balanced data set, Alpha can build a more effective fraud detection system. A better-performing system has the potential to save institutions millions by catching fraudulent transactions that might otherwise go unnoticed. In addition, it can also improve customer trust and satisfaction. By curbing such incidents, institutions can retain the trust and loyalty of their customers.

In addition, synthetic data is used for rigorous testing and development without violating customer privacy or data protection regulations. This avoids legal problems and reputational damage that institutions may experience.

In essence, the application of generative AI not only enhances the technical capabilities of an institution's fraud detection system, but also significantly improves its business goals and customer relationships.

Generative AI to simplify test data management Imagine trying to maintain a huge, chaotic library that can sometimes feel like managing a lot of test data like this. Generative AI offers a smarter solution; It generates test data as needed, reducing the need for a lot of storage space and ensuring that the data is always fresh.

In a continuous test environment, running multiple tests per day and using static test data can result in invalid tests due to outdated data. However, with generative AI, test teams can generate a new set of data for each test run, ensuring that a variety of scenarios are covered.

A real-world example: eCommerce testing Consider Alpha, a globally renowned e-commerce company that manages a complex website platform serving millions of customers worldwide. The platform boasts numerous features, including product browsing, customer reviews, shopping cart management, and sophisticated checkout and payment processing. To ensure smooth operation, Alpha employs continuous testing and timely identification and problem resolution.

Alpha's testing team conducts extensive daily tests to verify the functionality, performance, and security of the system. For these tests to be effective, they need diverse and updated data that mimics real-world customer interactions.

Challenges with traditional setups In traditional setups, test teams use static datasets copied from production data. However, there are two main problems with this approach:

Data obsolescence: As market dynamics and customer behavior continue to change, static data quickly becomes outdated, resulting in poor testing.

Storage issues: Maintaining a large static test data set that matches the diversity and volume of production data requires a lot of storage space and constant management, adding complexity and cost.

Generative AI comes in handy However, Alpha has incorporated generative AI into their testing process to address these challenges. Before each test run, the generative AI model creates a new, synthetic dataset that closely resembles real data based on patterns in the production data.

For example, when testing a payment processing system, generative AI models generate synthetic data for different types of credit cards, purchase amounts, user locations, and transaction times, mimicking the current customer's transaction behavior.

Real Impact The freshness of the data ensures that it reflects the latest trends and patterns in customer behavior, enabling more effective and relevant testing. Because synthetic data is generated on demand and can be discarded after testing, the need for bulky storage and data management infrastructure is greatly reduced.

By integrating generative AI into their test data management, Alpha ensures more effective and efficient continuous testing, improving system reliability and enhancing the customer experience.

Challenges and considerations There are also some challenges to adopting generative AI. The quality of the training data of the AI model ultimately affects the quality of the output data. Unless we have a clear understanding of the data sources used to generate AI model training, the quality of the data created raises questions. In addition, generating test data using generative AI requires significant computing resources, which may not be feasible for all organizations.

In terms of ethics, although the synthetic data does not contain any sensitive information, it is important to ensure that it does not accidentally reveal any information about the individuals in the training data. Addressing these challenges responsibly is key.

Generative AI is destined to change the landscape of software testing. By enabling us to create diverse and realistic synthetic data, it ushers in a new era of software testing – an era of efficiency, comprehensiveness, and flexibility.

Looking ahead, the prospect of generative AI is exciting. Advances in this technology have the potential to reshape current workflows and practices. Organizations must stay updated and ready to adapt.

While the road to integrating generative AI may encounter some difficulties, the potential payoffs — more efficient, comprehensive, and adaptable software testing — make it a worthwhile journey. Let's lead this path responsibly and embrace the bright future that generative AI brings.

Goodfellow, Ian, et al.，“Generative Adversarial Nets，”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2014. [papers.nips.cc/paper/5423-generative-adversarial-nets]

Toraskar，Kshitij，等。 “Synthetic Data for Deep Learning.” IBM Developer，2020年8月24日，[developer.ibm.com/technologies/artificial-intelligence/articles/synthetic-data-for-deep-learning/]

Duman, Evrim and M. Hamit Serin。 "Detecting credit card fraud with decision trees and support vector machines." International Congress of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Volume 1, 2011. [www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2011/IMECS2011_pp442-447.pdf]

Horton，Bob。 "Category imbalance, revisit." Microsoft Developer Blogs, December 29, 2016, [developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blogs/class-imbalance-redux/]

Ghosh，Souvik。 "Data generated using generative adversarial networks (GANs)." Medium, Towards Data Science, March 23, 2020, [towardsdatascience.com/data-generation-with-generative-adversarial-networks-gans-977bdc2a89a0]

Reich，Gary。 "The hidden cost of stale data in your automation scripts." Applitools, November 27, 2018, [applitools.com/blog/stale-test-data]

Ching, Andrew, et al. "Compute requirements for production machine learning services." Medium, Towards Data Science, July 18, 2018, [towardsdatascience.com/on-the-computational-requirements-for-production-machine-learning-services-208b311dbf6e]

Mehta，Anjali。 "Privacy and Ethics in AI." Medium, Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine, June 2, 2020, [becominghuman.ai/privacy-and-ethics-in-ai-d0d21a624018]