Yang Zhenning said: I have always believed that China's social environment, educational philosophy, and education system are good for children with 60 to 85 points of ability, and he can make such people useful and talented. When you grow up, you can develop in a formal direction. China's construction in recent decades is closely related to such a system. But the social environment and education system of the United States as a whole are particularly beneficial to people with a score of 95 or more. Because he adopts a laissez-faire attitude. Laissez-faire is not good for most people, but very smart cutting-edge talents. But they need to be allowed to give them room to play freely.
From Yang Zhenning's words, it can be reflected that education in our country is the fairest and most democratic. Good for most people.
Ironically, the United States, which claims to be the most democratic and liberal in the world, is undemocratic in terms of education and benefits only a few people.
Of course, this passage also points out the social reality formed by education in China and the United States.
It is difficult for China's education to produce high-end talents, and few people in low-end industries such as blue-collar jobs, manufacturing, and service industries are willing to do it, because most people are in an education level, and the difference is not obvious.
Education in the United States not only ensures the emergence of a small number of geniuses and high-end talents, but also ensures that there are people in various low-end industries to do things, because after all, those who read well are a minority, and they can only be willing to do blue-collar work such as manufacturing and service industries.
Obviously, there is no conclusion as to which kind of education is better.
