Under the evil epidemic, the most difficult thing in the world is not only the bosses from all walks of life, but also the fans of the NBA. I'm certainly not a boss, and as a 20-year fan and amateur writer, it's a bit nerve-wracking to have no games to watch in March.
I have a friend who said that in addition to work and life, without the company of the game, he can only watch action movies to pass the time. Cough, this is really a friend, not me.
There is about no night and a half, idle knocking chess pieces to drop the lights and flowers.
Although I did not have the elegance to knock on the chess pieces and drop the lights, I was still very interested in waving the keyboard in my hand and continuing to brag, talk, and idle with my few readers.
There is a saying that "children who can cry have milk to eat", so I followed the rhythm of a certain sound of the big god rain teacher and wrote some articles about the historical status of the star. Although the effect was as expected - there was not much repercussion, but seeing that a few iron fans still left words to interact with me, I wiped a handful of old tears, showed a slightly strong smile, and resolved to do the "keyboard man" to the end.
Today is idle, come and go, let's continue to talk about those more imaginative assumptions.
Today we see a very interesting topic: if Jordan, O'Neal, Kobe Bryant, James, Durant, Curry 6 historical supergiants set a set of starting five Tigers, who should be excluded?
In order not to be sprayed to death as black powder, I assured my beer belly that the following is purely personal opinion, if it is inappropriate, please correct, anyway, I may not change.
Combined with the chronology, fat or thin suffers losses
The power of each lineup must be combined with the environment and age. It's like Genghis Khan's cavalry sweeping the world, but in the era of hot weapons, you won't be able to bear to watch.
If it had been in the 1980s and 1990s, I would have excluded Curry first. Thirty or forty years ago in the NBA, what era was that? It was an era when the behemoths on the inside were turning the tables, and Malone's iron elbow could kill David Robinson; it was an era when the league was full of villains and thugs, and the "bad boy army" led by Lambier made the magician say something like this: "When you see Lambier standing expressionless under the basket, you will suddenly lose the idea of going to the basket, because no one wants to be reimbursed for the season because of the last basket." ”
Curry is a very hard-working player, he looks slightly thin under the body, has a heart of indomitable. But in an era like that, Curry's defense could drag down a team. And under the high-intensity confrontation tacitly approved by the league, Curry's fragile ankles and palms can withstand 82 regular season games must also be a question mark.
In today's NBA, I would have given up on O'Neal. I've heard a similar claim more than once that the NBA today plays small because there aren't players like O'Neal! Is this really the case? In this era of three points and emphasis on offensive and defensive conversions, the Sharks may be able to cut melons and cut vegetables under the basket, just as he did back then. But once the two teams pulled apart and ran, the fat man would not be run to death, and I expressed my concern. On the defensive end, in addition to being able to defend the three-second zone, Ao Fat seems unable to take care of the opponent's outside three-pointers.
Moreover, given that the league encourages offense indefinitely, and in terms of overall output, I prefer Curry, who has a career true shooting rate of 62.3%, rather than O'Neal, who has a career true shooting rate of 58.6%.
Combined with tactical play, it is necessary to optimize the efficiency of attack and defense
If I want to pursue the ultimate offense, I want to take out Kobe. On offense alone, these 6 people are all offensive gods that are unparalleled in NBA history. Jordan's mid-range, LeBron's "three threats", Curry's three-pointer, Durant's no-solution, Kobe Bryant's shooting combination, the Sharks' powerful basket, any one to take out, are all super weapons in "Domestic 007" - you want to die 3000. But when you have a Jordan in your team, and then a Kobe Bryant with a similar position and playing style, it seems to be a waste of offensive resources.
Bryant's 55% career true shooting percentage is good enough, but it is already the lowest among 6 people. Therefore, if you only pursue offense, you would like to ask Comrade Lao Ke to carry forward his style.
If you're going to forge a defensive defense, sorry Curry, I'll have to take you off again. Because I really envision james + jordan + kobe + durant + O'Neal's defensive fivesome, can make the opponent feel how desperate.
In addition, whether a team plays a triangle offense, or plays the Warriors' full open offensive system, or a full-staff star head-to-head like the Rockets, and the Cavaliers' one-star shooting, etc., may come up with different answers.
Combined with team compatibility, I have a bold idea
Frankly speaking, if a team's starting lineup is 5 super giants, you don't want to achieve compatibility at all, and it has never appeared in history, and there is no way to verify it (the All-Star Game played does not count). The main reason is clear - there is only one basketball, and there cannot be five leaders.
On paper alone, any 5 of the 6 people teamed up, and the compatibility of Old Zhan with others may be the most difficult to reconcile.
I'm 100 percent sure I don't mean anything about Black Old Zhan, but I've respected and admired him very much over the years. However, even the youngest Jamie knows that James's favorite configuration is "one-star", and he has an exclusive term called "bring-your-own system". He needs to hold the ball in his hand, launch an attack, and when he rushes to the basket, the best way to handle the ball is to either pass to the shooter in the two bottom corners or transfer to the center to "eat the pie".
The question is, Curry, Durant, Jordan and Kobe Bryant, which one is more like a bottom corner shooter? Or does the Shark look like a pie-eating center? To say more, the fat man's weight of more than 300 pounds to the basket under a pestle, the space is completely blocked, it is estimated that old Zhan wants to break into it is a difficult thing.
If you don't let Old Zhan hold the ball, let Curry hold the ball to launch a blocking attack, or let Jordan and Kobe Bryant take the ball to play alone, or let the Sharks have a position inside, then what should Old Zhan do? A LeBron with 50% discounted power, or LeBron?
That is to say, if you consider the compatibility of the configuration, my bold idea is to secretly cross out LeBron's name!
Combining personal feelings, it makes sense to pass everyone
From this point of view, it is really irrelevant to the skill, only to personal preferences. I can finally stand up straight and speak boldly with confidence.
I love watching Jordan kill the game with an unsolvable mid-range and incredible basket trolley, watching the old Ko's picturesque back-up jumper, watching Curry's stormy three-pointer, watching the Sharks crush opposing defenders on the inside, and watching LeBron's thunderous dunks. In addition, there is such a throw that likes to watch the "Grim Reaper" Durant's scythe waving. However, considering the "difficult road" that Du Xiaoshuai chose in the summer of 2016, it caused some damage to my not-so-pure heart. Out of personal feelings, then cut Durant!
Since it is a leisure day, it is more bragging than anyone. I believe that this teaming model, which does not exist in reality, will have a different conclusion in everyone's mind. As for whether you can convince others, it's the Woodpecker Games – see who has a harder mouth!
Finally, I want to tell a small story that is not a story. Before I met my current wife, others had introduced me to several objects, and many times, after a meal, the girls would give me a slightly shy sentence: "I think you are a good person, but we are not very suitable." "I believe the girls are speaking from the heart, mainly because I have a thick skin.
This sentence of the girls can also be used in our summary today at this moment. What fits is the right one!