Museum theft is not the first time in the mainland, because of imperfect equipment and facilities, management personnel are not careful enough and other reasons, many treasured cultural relics in the museum were stolen by thieves, such as a teenager named Xu anti-emperor stole the plain yarn cicada clothes in the Hunan Provincial Museum, burned and rushed into the toilet, causing irreparable losses. Protecting cultural relics is the responsibility of every cultural relics expert, but one expert is self-thief, stealing the Golden Dragon cultural relics and throwing them into the moat, causing 8 million losses.
In the 1980s, the management of the museum opened the door of the museum as usual and inspected the cultural relics as usual, and in the process of inspection, the management found that one of the Cultural Relics of the Liao Dynasty worth 8 million Yuanjin Dragon had disappeared. This golden dragon is very delicately crafted, both in form and in the art of carving, and it is like looking at a living dragon. Since its excavation, this dragon has been identified as a national treasure of the mainland, which has been valued by experts in the industry and has a very important significance for the study of dragon cultural relics on the mainland.
Many tourists come to the museum to see the style of the golden dragon, but no one thought that this golden dragon would disappear like this! Could it be that the golden dragon flew away? This is obviously impossible, then it can only mean that someone stole it! So who is the murderer who stole the Golden Dragon? With the help of the police, the museum checked the visitors who had visited the museum the day before, but none of them found the thief with the motive of theft, let alone the golden dragon relics. At that time, the mainland was in the early stages of development, and without relying on scientific and technological means, it was as difficult to find this golden dragon as a needle on the seabed.
According to the clues given by the shopkeeper, King Kong shunten finally found the suspect and arrested him. No one thought that the suspect who stole the Golden Dragon cultural relics was actually an expert in the museum, who was at the scene when the cultural relics were found to be lost, and repeatedly provided the police with golden dragon information, showing a distressed look. I have to say that the psychological quality of this expert is really too strong, not only did he not have the slightest fear after committing the crime, but he also took the initiative to contact the police and provided him with a lot of false information, which led to the police going in the wrong direction of investigation.
Under the pressure of the police, the expert explained in detail the process of stealing the golden dragon. At that time, he became greedy because he liked this golden dragon, and was driven by desire to steal it, but after getting the cultural relics in his hands, he began to regret it. However, the matter was a foregone conclusion and he was not allowed to return. In order not to be noticed, he destroyed the cultural relics, a large part of which was thrown into the moat, leaving only a small part to create a gold ring, who knew that this gold ring made him reveal his identity. The expert's behavior has violated the principle of being an expert in cultural relics, and the cultural relics community can no longer tolerate him, and what awaits him next will be imprisonment.