<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="1" > Xi'an Marathon, tiger butt can't be touched? </h1>
Authorized by Tintinrunner
Last night, Jiao Quiet apologized again.
Strictly speaking, this is the third time she has apologized. On the morning of the 18th, she apologized to the Xi'an Marathon in the circle of friends. On the 19th, she posted two videos on Douyin to apologize. But this morning, many people in the Douyin message area still asked her to apologize, believing that she smeared Xima and smeared Xi'an. I don't know if her private message exploded? Is it also full of insults and accusations?
The reason for the matter is roughly like this: a video circulated after the race shows that on the 17th, in the Xi'an Marathon, Jiao Jing won the half-distance women's championship, which took 1 hour and 19 minutes. After crossing the line, Jiao Quiet thought there was an award ceremony, so he asked the staff where the award was. The volunteers and staff around me didn't know what to do.
According to reports, Jiao Jingjing said in his personal live broadcast that there was no ranking card, no trophy, and no award to win the championship, and it felt as if he had not run. I haven't found this live broadcast now, I don't know if it's true. However, the video of her on-site inquiry was posted to the Internet and social media by some self-media or viewers, which triggered a hot discussion. Some people angrily accused her of not watching the "Competition Regulations", and some people used the title to play and complain about the competition...
Someone should have told her that there was no award ceremony in the middle of the competition regulations.
Since the 17th, some people have been insulting and accusing:
She apologized on the 18th and 19th, explaining:
But many people still do not spare, today (20th) in her two apology videos asked her to apologize:
Returning to the whole incident, we may as well sort it out calmly:
First, is there anything wrong with Being Quiet?
No big mistake.
If there is a mistake, it is also a small mistake. She must have been negligent and careless, not carefully examining the West Malaysia Competition Rules, thinking that she would follow the conventions. For major marathons in China, especially west Malaysia, which is known as the elite signage event of the World Athletics Federation, she may be accustomed to thinking that there is an award ceremony for the half-horse event.
West Malaysia's "Competition Regulations" and "Official Manual" do not mention that there is an award ceremony for the half-horse project.
Strictly speaking, neither the West Malaysia "Competition Regulations" nor the official manual clearly emphasize that there is no on-site award ceremony for the half marathon project, but only state that "the top three men and women in the marathon project will be awarded trophies and medals on the spot." "In theory, there are two outcomes to the half-horse award ceremony: there may be, and there is likely to be none.
Is this a flaw? I think it's flawed and not rigorous enough, but it's not much of a problem in itself. The main problem is the athletes themselves.
Moreover, if at the pre-race technical briefing, the organizing committee clearly emphasized that there was no on-site awarding and other links in the half marathon, and Jiao Jing, as an elite athlete, should not participate, it would be her fault. We don't know that right now. However, as a competitor of the event sponsorship brand, Jiao Jing will most likely not be invited.
However, the athletes fought for the first place (at least the first gunfire), and it is reasonable to ask where the award is after the game. Moreover, this is a question sentence, not a rhetorical question, and most people should not understand it as blaming the organizing committee and smearing the event, right?
Is there also a mistake in asking? She often stands on the platform, and it is also normal for her to have the subjective experience of "as if she has never run" after the game. Right?
The attitude of apologizing three times is no problem, right? What else?
Second, is there anything wrong with the organizing committee?
That's right!
Both the Race Regulations and the Official Handbook mention that the half marathon is ranked by net timing results.
Theoretically, the top three in the gun performance are not necessarily the final three. The final ranking and score also need to be confirmed by the referee according to the chip timing.
Therefore, there is no ranking plate on the spot, according to the "Competition Regulations" of West Malaysia, it is no problem.
According to the Guidelines for Running Marathons and Related Sports in China (2021), the event can organize a starting ceremony and an award ceremony. However, it is also explained that the award ceremony can arrange awards for the top three men and women on the spot, and the winners are usually ranked according to the results of the gunshots.
What does this mean? First of all, the award ceremony is not a mandatory standard, even the full marathon event can not be awarded on the spot; secondly, the ranking is usually based on gunfire, but it does not exclude the net timing ranking.
Third, is the organizing committee responsible?
Some.
Procedurally speaking, the organizing committee is right, albeit flawed.
But, does no problem mean a little responsibility?
For example, the volunteers and staff on the scene did not know three questions. There was also a mockery in the video, of course, which could not be determined whether it was a staff member. The athletes did not know that there was no award ceremony in the half-horse event, and the volunteers and staff on the scene did not know about it? Is there no training before the race?
If there is training before the game, if the volunteers on the scene, especially the staff, are very familiar with the rules, and quickly come forward to reassure and explain, are the athletes still so confused? As for the controversy and even criticism that followed?
Jiao Jing waited for foreign runners to come to Xi'an, and for Xi'an, those were all guests. Whether they win the championship or not, whether they are celebrities or not, they are all guests, distinguished guests. If the guest does not understand things, does the host not understand things?
Can't touch this tiger's ass in West Malaysia? An event where someone likes someone doesn't like someone neutral is normal. Athletes complain based on their own ignorance, ignorance or negligence, but if it is not malicious, if there is no rumor and nothing wrong, is it tolerable?
If a sentence of spit has triggered more people to complain about a large area, should the event itself also reflect on it?
Are those who have been insulting and not being unforgiving really fans of Simma? More like low-grade red and high-grade black. Xima was good in the past, but it couldn't stand such a rough Internet storm, right? Xi'an, the ancient capital of the 13th Dynasty, has a profound cultural heritage, and is a world-class tourist city, and the citizens have always been hospitable.
It is impossible to imagine that those who have continuously attacked maliciously from the 17th to the 20th are not loyal fans of West Malaysia. People who really love Xi'an and Xima should be rational, kind, and tolerant, right?
The network public opinion and even personal attacks caused by Jiao's quiet spit, shouldn't you come forward to explain it in a timely manner? Wouldn't it be nice to guide your fans?
Again, you don't come forward to explain, don't guide in good faith, there's nothing wrong with that, there's nothing wrong with laws, regulations, and procedures. But your "Competition Rules" are not dense and sparse, at least not explicitly emphasized, which has caused misunderstandings. Besides, your volunteers and staff did not fulfill their jobs at the first time! (Theoretically, it exists afterwards)
As the saying goes, be kind, even if you don't break the law, you don't have any problems.
A half-horse is not a horse, but there is no distinction between event organization and service. There is no distinction between big and small hearts in awe.
West Malaysia is usually held in the autumn, and it is said that it was held in the first half of the year because of the National Games. meddlesome! However, even if nothing can be properly guided, can it still cope with the complex public opinion environment of the National Games?
Fourth, what is the implication of this?
Some insiders commented on this: "Obviously, the organizing committee did not take you seriously. This has nothing to do with whether there is an award or not, it is a matter of treating people and things. In his opinion, this kind of elite athletes go to the competition, after the game no one cares, the elite athletes really do not have to go in the future.
Presumably, for elite athletes like Jiao Jingjing, we must carefully review the "Competition Regulations" in the future. Her lesson this time should be profound and unforgettable. It also gives other elite athletes more warnings.
In the past, because there were no cases of rules and losses, there were many times in Chinese athletes and coaches, and they will not be repeated one by one. I hope to eat a long and wise, and I hope that elite athletes will take the lead in setting an example, and cannot always make low-level and technical mistakes such as not looking at competition regulations.
The same is true of the majority of runners. Although the award ceremony has nothing to do with the vast majority of people, it is very necessary to carefully read the procedures and registration instructions. To be a runner who understands the rules, etiquette, and knows the progress and retreat is the greatest respect for the event.