laitimes

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

If you pay attention to the news of the British royal family, you must know that a big thing has happened in the British royal family this year, that is, Queen Elizabeth II was unfortunately infected during the epidemic in the United Kingdom, so she had to leave her work and stay in bed.

According to the latest British media reports, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom has now recovered in general health, but according to insiders, although her old man's condition is soothing, she still cannot fully recover her health, so she still cannot return to the normal working state before the infection.

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

Queen Elizabeth II was unfortunately infected with the epidemic and was forced to take sick leave, which quickly caused a heated controversy on the Internet, because in fact, the Queen is very old, her old family is now more than ninety years old, old age and physical decline is inevitable, so people have begun to pay attention to one thing, that is, the selection of the next British monarch.

According to the current british law, if Queen Elizabeth II no longer holds the position of British monarch for various reasons, then the kingship of the United Kingdom will be passed on to Prince Charles, the eldest son of the first heir, Queen Elizabeth II.

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

However, for Prince Charles to inherit the throne of the British King, there is always a certain controversy, the reason is mainly because Prince Charles was married when he was young, which led to divorce with his original wife Princess Diana, which made many British people dissatisfied with the hearty prince, so that they did not want to see Prince Charles become the king of Britain, and objectively speaking, Prince Charles is more than seventy years old this year, and his age is also very old. Inheriting the Throne of England would also raise questions about whether the body could bear the heavy pressure of work.

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

Therefore, there has been controversy on the Internet about Prince Charles's succession to the British King's throne, and many people have called on Queen Elizabeth II to directly pass the British King's throne to Prince Charles's eldest son, Prince William. At the same time, the British media is also quite concerned about Prince Charles's succession to the British King's throne, and often publishes some related reports.

On April 12, local time, the British media published a report on the matter and commented on the matter. Charles may not be called king, and there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne, and the reasons are unexpected.

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

Although Charles's name is reportedly Charles, it is likely that he may have chosen not to use the name "King Charles" as his title after ascending the throne, but instead chose another title. Charles chose not to be called "King Charles" for a very special reason: "King Charles" is a title with a negative connotation.

The report quoted former royal butler Grant Harold in an interview with Studio 10: "Usually royal children have two or three names. The reason is that, if possible, for the child to become king or queen, they must have multiple different names to choose from.

"For example, if Prince Charles becomes king, he will be Charles III. But strictly speaking, he could also be George VII, because George was also one of his names. ”

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

If Charles had chosen his name, he would have become King Charles III, however, royal commentators predicted that he would have decided to oppose the decision due to the negative implications surrounding the two former kings Charles.

Charles I, who became king in 1625, dissolved parliament three times and decided to rule alone four years later. He ruled for more than a decade without a parliament, a period known as "eleven years of tyranny."

After two civil wars, Charles I was tried and convicted for "tyrant, traitor, murderer and enemy of the nation" and beheaded on 30 January 1649 for treason.

Charles may or may not be called "King Charles" for unexpected reasons: there is uncertainty about his ascension to the throne

His son Charles II lived in exile until his coronation as King of England, Ireland and Scotland in 1661.

Charles II was popular as the "Happy Monarch", and he changed the laws introduced by Oliver Cromwell to give people more freedom to enjoy themselves. However, he also lived a controversial lifestyle as he had at least 14 illegitimate children.

Grant Harold commented: "It is unlikely that Prince Charles would want to take the name [King Charles], however, we cannot be sure until he ascends to the throne. Therefore, there is uncertainty about Prince Charles's ascension to the throne. ”

Read on