laitimes

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

Congratulations to Harry and Meghan, who have played well with the boat first. On March 8, after Harry and Meghan preemptively sent a spokesman to announce to the world that their daughter Lilibet had been baptized in the name of a princess in an American mansion, a British royal source told the British "Mirror" reporter that the official website of Buckingham Palace will update the new titles of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in due course - Prince Archie, Princess Lilibet. From now on, this worried pair of parents will no longer have to despair over the "snobbery" of Buckingham Palace, because their children are now princes and princesses like the three cousins of the Prince of Wales' uncle's family.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

The source added that the reason why the Sussex children's new identities were delayed on the official website was because the palace wanted to know what the Harry couple who had fled the United States wanted to do.

They attacked the existence of the royal family, and the noble image of not seeking fame and fortune has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people with memoirs and documentaries.

The palace believed that they were likely to insist on not giving any titles of high nobility to their children like their aunt Princess Anne and uncle Prince Edward.

Royal experts twisted their beards and said that Prince Harry's fight for titles for his children was foreseeable, because the child's father alone made a lot of dollars from the blood link with the British royal family as a prince, and now he is about to enter the billionaires' club.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

Prince Harry and his American wife Meghan are unlikely to get their children Archie and Lilibet to give up their supreme royal titles, and they understand very well how much the British monarchy is worth to them, especially in the United States, a place where money is everywhere.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who were seeking life at Vanity Fair in the United States, gave a clear answer as scheduled.

They want everything.

The spokesperson of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced on March 7, US time, that Duke Harry and his wife Meghan's second child was personally baptized and named by the Archbishop of Los Angeles last Friday.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

A spokesman for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex said: "I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was named by the Rev. John Taylor, Archbishop of Los Angeles, on Friday, March 3. ”

The baptism was held privately at the Sussex home, California, and about 25 guests with enough identities to match the host couple attended Friday's ceremony.

The Duke, 38, and the Duchess, 41, watched the baptism together with their eldest son Archie, Meghan's mom Doria Lagran, Lily's godfather, Tyler Perry, an unnamed godmother, and 20 to 30 close friends.

Meghan's father didn't have the honor to attend.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

After the ceremony, guests enjoyed an afternoon of eating, dancing and merrying in the £11.2 million mansion.

The archbishop who baptized the little princess is not an ordinary person.

Although he is not the Archbishop of Los Angeles (Catholic), Pastor Taylor is also a powerful and well-connected figure.

He is the Los Angeles Bishop of the Anglican Church of America and is part of the Episcopal Church worldwide.

Harry and his wife would not have asked a Catholic nobleman to baptize their daughter, because Catholic baptism could be an obstacle to Lilibet's future succession to the English throne.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

After all, Prince Harry once said that he himself was only one plane crash away from the British throne, not to mention his daughter.

Bishop Taylor was one of former U.S. President Nixon's closest confidants in his later years, co-executor of Nixon's legacy, and director of the Nixon Library.

Nixon once called Bishop Taylor "our House liberal."

The pastor became a pastor before becoming a researcher and editorial assistant and chief of staff to the former president before becoming a monk in 2004.

Bishop Taylor was elected as the seventh Bishop of Los Angeles for the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles in December 2016 and took office in December 2017.

He also has four children and two grandchildren.

Charles did not decide whether to take away the new titles of Prince Harry's sons and daughters; Buckingham Palace: will be updated in due course

In the matter of asking his father for the child's seal, Harry used the same method as naming the child "Lilibet", cutting first and then playing, "I am not here to ask you, I am here to inform you".

A royal source confirmed that Harry and Meghan told King Charles III that they intended to use titles for their children.

He said: "The proper conversation was already taking place before today's news (Lilibet Baptism) came out. ”

Buckingham Palace therefore said that the genealogy of the official heirs of the royal family "will be updated in due course" to reflect everyone's new identity.

Although insiders say that King Charles III, the grandfather who became the children, has not yet decided whether his youngest two grandchildren can use the fame of princes and princesses to swagger, if he really wants to deny them, the monarch must personally take the royal decree and publicly strip the two of the names that they technically automatically acquired six months ago.

This was a difficult task for Charles III, who had always wanted to avoid a frontal conflict.

Read on