When Prince Harry fiercely attacked and ridiculed his native family through documentaries and memoirs, many British people expressed indignation, and at the same time questioned why Charles III, as a king, showed such "weakness" to his younger son's actions and did not say a word.
But now it seems that Charles's counterattack is still there. According to the "Daily Mail" local time on the morning of March 1, Charles expelled Harry Meghan from the "Frogmore Cottage" and gave it to his second brother, Prince Andrew, to live. It is reported that Buckingham Palace has issued a deportation notice to Harry Meghan.
Meanwhile, Harry Meghan, who bears the titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex, is making plans to ship their remaining property to the United States.
This is the "Frogmore Cottage", which is said to be a cottage, but it is actually a five-bedroom villa, a wedding gift from the late Queen Elizabeth II to the Hamey couple, and the only residence for the two in the United Kingdom. From this point of view, Charles really left his younger son homeless in the UK.
They had previously lived in "Nottingham House" in Kensington Palace and were neighbours of their sister-in-law William Kate, but later they moved away because they claimed they wanted their own space. Interestingly, a few years later, when Hamel didn't live much in the "Frogmore Cottage", William Kate moved with his three children to the "Adelaide Cottage", which is only about 116 meters away.
Harry Meghan has shown in a documentary that their life in the "Frogmore Cottage" does not look magnificent, but it is very warm.
Before Hamey moved in, it was used by employees working at Windsor Manor and was divided into five separate spaces.
Harry Meghan obviously wouldn't make do with it, they spent £2.4 million (about 20 million RMB) to renovate it, and Meghan bought herself a luxurious copper bathtub. At the time, the matter caused a lot of controversy because the huge amount of money was provided by taxpayers. However, it is said that after retiring as a senior member of the royal family, Hamei faced great public pressure, and they returned the money.
A person familiar with the matter explained to the media: "The removal of Harry Meghan will undoubtedly mean the end of their life in the UK". In this way, the possibility of Harry Meghan attending Charles' coronation in May this year is much smaller, and the couple may really not show up, and even if they do, it will not be of much benefit to them.
At the same time, it was also reported that Prince Andrew had received an invitation to move to "Frogmore Cottage" last week, but he declined. "But it also shows Harry and Meghan's inability to reverse their deportation," people familiar with the matter said.
Andrew wanted to stay at the Royal Hotel, a larger property in the Windsor estate, but his king brother wanted to take it back so he could save money. And Andrew, who is accustomed to a luxurious life, certainly will not easily agree to leave, even if his current situation does not have any advantages. "It's time for Andrew to live within his means, not to expect others to fund him to live a life of luxury," said Norman Baker, a royal finance expert.