Intel has released two graphics cards, including Arc A370M and A350M, which can only be said to be unsatisfactory in terms of performance, and there is still a relatively large performance gap in the face of flagship graphics, in addition, because the first notebook equipped with Intel Arc graphics is of course Samsung's terminal products, so the first reviews are basically from Samsung, and the specific performance of arc A370M graphics cards has been announced before. Now the technology users from South Korea have also announced the performance of the A350M graphics card, equipped with the Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 2 notebook, due to the reduction in specifications, so the A350M graphics card is worse than the GTX 1650 in performance.
This time, the Arc A350M graphics card was exposed, using 6 Xe architectures, 6 optical tracing architectures, a reference frequency of 1150MHz, and 4GB of GDDR6 video memory. In addition, the CPU equipped with It is Intel's 12th generation Core i5-1240P processor, which is undoubtedly a mid-range notebook. In terms of specific running scores, Intel Arc's TimeSpy running score is about 3000 points, which is still higher than the MX550, but it is not as good as NVIDIA's GTX 1650 50W version of the graphics card, but it is still a bit ahead of the GTX 1650 Max-Q version.
In the specific game test, based on 1080P resolution and low image quality, the Arc A350M's game frame rate can meet the operation of mainstream e-sports games, such as "Overwatch" is around 70 frames, while "League of Legends" is 100 frames, but it is powerless against games like "COD". In addition, the Intel Arc 350M graphics card does not reach 100% of the video memory usage in the actual game, and it seems that Intel's driver has a lot of room for improvement. Now it seems that the Intel Arc 300 series graphics can only meet the smooth running of esports games, as for the AAA masterpiece, it is still a bit difficult.