Tesla shutdowns continue or price increases, rights protection car owners occur, and they are also trapped in stall doors

E week memorabilia, weekly new melon. Recently, it seems that Musk is still relatively restrained, not creating a particularly hot hot search topic, after all, the German factory has begun to produce, Tesla directly into the hinterland of the car kingdom, everything is towards a thriving development.

Because of this, even if the Tesla Shanghai factory continues to stop work this week, the "roof rights protection" parties occur, the German car owner complains about the quality of the new car, and the Tesla stall recall on Thursday, tesla stock price has still increased slightly as of writing.

When to stop production, there is no answer

Due to external factors, Tesla's plan to resume production at its Shanghai factory on Monday has been canceled, and officials have not yet notified the specific reasons, nor have they indicated when production will resume. According to people familiar with the matter, Tesla informed employees by email on April 3 that the resumption date would continue to be postponed.

In fact, due to external factors, Tesla's Shanghai Gigafactory postponed the resumption of work, which is basically not a news, but it will greatly affect the rhythm of Tesla's production, sales, delivery, maintenance and so on. At the same time, Tesla's models have recently increased prices many times, if you continue to stop production, it may also trigger a new round of price increases, after all, everyone understands that Tesla's production and manufacturing cost fluctuation feedback, not only fast but also more.

In this regard, Musk said: "When production can be resumed is still unknown, which will bring uncertainty to Tesla's second-quarter delivery, or will pull down Tesla's annual sales performance." ”

Brake door rights protection continues

Historical coincidences are staggering, and this year Musk expects Q2 quarter sales to be affected, all due to external factors. In the Q2 quarter of last year, Tesla was also affected by external influences, and it was also in Shanghai.

On the media day of the Shanghai Auto Show in April last year, Ms. Zhang, wearing a T-shirt printed with the words "brake failure", appeared at the Tesla booth to defend her rights and shouted "Tesla brake failure", and then was forcibly dragged away from the scene by security guards and administratively detained for 5 days for disturbing public order.

On the same day, many car companies released strategies and new cars, but they will always pull out people to report on the hot events of the day. Ms. Zhang's act of safeguarding her rights also kicked off the prelude to Tesla's braking rights protection.

Although tesla's legal department has won some rights defense lawsuits last year, and by the way, on the eve of this year's Spring Festival, it has obtained the highest hot topic at the lowest cost, but Ms. Zhang's rights defense lawsuits are still continuing.

Just this Tuesday, Ms. Zhang, a party to the "roof rights protection case" of Tesla's female owner, posted a video on her personal Weibo to publish the progress related to tesla's civil litigation case. In the video, Ms. Zhang said that the content of the video revealed the truth of the right to reputation case, and pointed out that Tesla's global vice president Ms. Tao Lin said that she "refused to accept testing", "only willing to pay high compensation" and "the recent negatives are all contributed by her" and other claims are not true and are slanderous.

For Tesla, a tough attitude is no problem, after all, there were more than one or two news about Tesla's braking problem last year, and the visual impact and inner impact exposed by the accident video are really not small.

However, Tesla has not yet had an official statement on the braking problem, and judging from the cases in which it won the lawsuit, it is basically a user misoperation. So why has there not been an official explanation so far, why Tesla owners love to misoperate, why there is no active treatment measure, why the active braking system has not taken emergency measures under the premise of the owner's misoperation?

Tesla also owes owners an explanation, a real explanation.

Recall due to stall

While the Tesla brake door has not yet been solved, the stall door has been solved. Tesla owners finally know that the sudden stall of their car is not a personal reason, but it is really fatal.

On April 7, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued a recall notice, Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. in accordance with the requirements of the Regulations on the Administration of the Recall of Defective Automobile Products and the Implementation Measures for the Administration of the Recall of Defective Automobile Products, decided to recall from now on some imported and domestically produced Model 3 electric vehicles from January 11, 2019 to January 25, 2022, with a total of 127785 (including imported Models). 3 cars 34207 units, domestic Model 3 cars 93578 units).

According to the official website, there may be slight manufacturing differences in the power semiconductor components of the rear motor inverter of the vehicles within the scope of this recall, and the difference in component manufacturing after some vehicles have been used for a period of time may cause the rear inverter to fail, resulting in the inverter not being able to control the current normally. This failure occurs when the vehicle is in a parked state, which will cause the vehicle to fail to start; this failure occurs when the vehicle is in a driving state, which will cause the vehicle to lose driving power, and in extreme cases, it may increase the risk of collision of the vehicle, and there is a safety hazard.

In view of the above defects, Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will upgrade the motor control software for the vehicles within the scope of the recall through the vehicle remote upgrade (OTA) technology; for vehicles that cannot be recalled through the car remote upgrade (OTA) technology, the relevant users will be contacted through the service center to upgrade the motor control software for the vehicle, so as to closely monitor the rear motor inverter of the vehicle, and timely replace the rear inverter with related failures free of charge to eliminate safety hazards.

Judging from the above public data, from 19 to 22 years, a total of 127785 problematic Tesla Model 3, under the premise of safety hazards, on the domestic road, driving for three years, there may be a small number of problematic cars, but there is a great safety hazard in this kind of stall. Not only for this vehicle, but also for other vehicles.

In fact, I don't want to have too many comments on the stall door, I want to know, how did Tesla officially find this matter, is it after the owner of the car failure repair, only to find similar problems?