On April 19 last year, during the Shanghai Auto Show, female car owners in Anyang climbed on the roof of Tesla vehicles and shouted "Tesla brake failure" to defend their rights, which attracted the attention of netizens across the country.
However, to this day, the rights protection case has not yet come to fruition, and the female car owner's appeal has not changed, and she is still speaking out on the Internet, hoping that Tesla can provide the original data at the time of its car accident.
But on the other hand, Tesla has also been actively pursuing responsibility for the relevant personnel who "participated" in this rights protection case, and the car blogger Big V "Feng Shiming" was also involved.
According to Feng Shiming, on the day the female car owner was detained, he was also taken to the police station for questioning/interrogation, asking him what role he played in the Shanghai Auto Show 419 rights protection incident. The core problem is that I've provided a Media Day Pass; I'm the owner of a 7-person activist group.
In this regard, Feng Shiming explained that he was given three media day passes, and after Ms. Zhang repeatedly unsuccessfully tried to apply for a media card as a Weibo self-media identity, she transferred one at her request.
And Ms. Zhang's admission voucher is a media day pass. This is an anonymous, unrestricted voucher that is freely requested by the Exhibitor from the Organiser and may be transferred to others. The actual user fills in his identity information and can enter with the certificate after being reviewed by the system.
As for Ms. Zhang's excessive behavior in the exhibition hall after she was certified, there is no necessary connection with the certificate. She can enter through scalper tickets (as is the case with Mr. An), through exhibitors (Ms. Li once said she knew someone from a car company), or she can buy her own ticket on the next day's audience day.
Regarding the group owner, after Ms. Zhang expressed her idea of wanting to protect her rights at the auto show, she hoped that I could provide a legal and reasonable case of rights protection. So I pulled Ling Yun and her and formed a natural group of three people.
Ling Yun once appeared at the Changan Ford booth at the 2013 Guangzhou Auto Show, conveying the rights protection message of "Wing Tiger Broken Shaft". I checked with her that she had not been characterized as an offence by the local police station afterwards. More than a month later, Changan Ford announced a recall of more than 80,000 Impreza. This incident has been rumored to be a beautiful talk in the field of rights protection and has become a classic case.
After that, Ms. Zhang pulled 4 other rights car owners and named the group name, she was busy with work, and most of the discussions in the group did not participate.
However, on April 28, Tesla mentioned in an official article that Han Chao and I were the main organizers and planners of the "rights protection" incident; on September 3, we received a complaint on the right to reputation of the other party, listing 9 microblogs and appealing for 5 million. At the same time, on March 15 this year, it received a counterclaim from the other party about the 419 incident, claiming 5 million.
At present, Tesla's response to its lawsuit has exceeded 10 million, and Tesla said in its counterclaim that it seriously violated professional ethics, privately participated in organizing and planning others to make trouble, disrupted public order, and carried out infringing activities against Tesla.
But what I don't understand is that I have always been low-key and not for fame and fortune, or helped consumers and car companies to resolve disputes (including Tesla owners), or pointed out corporate problems to urge them to recall according to law, and in its mouth, it became a private participation in organizing and planning others to make trouble?
The following is the full text of Weibo:
