Recently, the hottest topic in Chinese football is the "war of words" between former international Feng Xiaoting and the famous cross-talk actor Gong Hanlin, and after the famous cross-talk actor Feng Gong was inexplicably "joined", it has shown a three-legged situation. The "cross-border struggle" between the men's football team and the entertainment industry continues to this day, and the victory and defeat can be described as very obvious: whether in terms of public opinion or momentum, the men's football team has shown its full momentum and lost badly.
Roughly speaking, the Chinese men's football team has made at least three fatal mistakes in this war of words:
First, it is nagging, smelly and long.
I don't know when the trend of writing "small essays" on social platforms has been learned by the stars of the Chinese men's football team. Unfortunately, these big guys show their male strength on the court, and they are really not very comfortable writing small essays. Taking Feng Xiaoting's late-night "selling miserable" essay as an example, the whole article is good to hear is nothing new; the ugly point is that it is "smelly and long", like a complaining woman, forcibly pulling on the sleeves of the spectators, crying over and over again: "I am so miserable, really miserable." ”
The problem is that Feng Xiaoting's set of words may also arouse the sympathy and thinking of outsiders at one time; but it is used more often, and it is still a long speech, which can only make outsiders more bored.
And Gong Hanlin and Feng Gong's mockery of the men's football team is much more powerful. Gong Hanlin used a proposal, Feng Gong used a short video segment, and conveniently stepped on the men's football team, pointing to the end, this is really smart. From this point of view, at the beginning, Feng Xiaoting responded to the comments of netizens with the sentence "gave way to Gong Hanlin", in fact, the irony was more sufficient, and it was more concise and powerful, but somehow later I wanted to write a small essay and dug a pit for myself.
Second, the logic is chaotic and counterproductive.
Because there are too many long arguments on the Chinese men's football side and too many scriptures, it is easy to have logical confusion. For example, Yang Cheng's small essay, the previous analysis of the current situation of Chinese football is still the head of the Road, and then suddenly came a sentence "Chinese football does add to the blockage of fans, but Gong Hanlin did not rush out of Asia", which is purely superfluous. Because if it is more true, then what is Gong Hanlin's standard for "rushing out of Asia"? As a senior sketch actor, Gong Hanlin has not gone to perform around the world, is this considered to be "rushing out of Asia"? In contrast, the men's football team has not been able to participate in the World Cup for twenty years, which is the real failure to rush out of Asia.
Another example is Dong Lu, who first satirized Feng Gong for relying on the national football team to "rub traffic", and then reminded the other party that "Chinese women's football" also eats sea cucumbers. Not to mention whether Feng Gong, as one of the most famous actors in China's cross-talk industry, relies on the topic of national football to rub traffic is established; just saying that "women's football also eats sea cucumbers" to give men's football as a shield is equivalent to rubbing fire for fans across the country, the reason is self-evident: women's football has achieved good results, what does the men's football team have?
On the other hand, the opponents of the men's football team: Gong Hanlin said that he had "been engaged in acting for more than thirty years and had not disgraced everyone"; Feng Gong said that the men's football team "looks like a sea cucumber, full of thorns but soft". These can be described as "precision guidance", directly bombarding the pain points of the men's football team, which is most likely to resonate with the public. And irony is irony, not so much nonsense, not pulling and pulling, the logic is clear and unambiguous. Compared with the players on the men's side, the judgment is high.
Third, take one's own weaknesses and attack the strengths of the other.
This may be the biggest cause of the Chinese men's football team's defeat this time. Gong Hanlin and Feng Gong, a group of language performance artists, may be the people who know the art of satire in China the most, and they have provoked them, so they wait to be choreographed later, and the passages made up are absolutely not repetitive.
As for the Chinese men's football team, not to mention that the players' skill points themselves are added to the physical quality, and the ability to fight a war of words is inherently insufficient; even if they are a few "media people" who are known for their sharp writing, they are far inferior to those who eat by mouth in the matter of squeezing people. Just like a few years ago, Guo Degang once sprayed a group of media reporters with dog blood, and the audience was also addicted to watching; and those media people, don't look at the usual dancing and ink, really encountered experts who played tricks, and could only lose.
Therefore, the men's football team has seized the position of public opinion with the laughing stars this time, and the final result can only be to make itself a joke. With this spare time, it is better to think about how to make people professionally unreasonable.