laitimes

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

Is the Chinese men's football team so bad? Why would anyone be on site to support?

In fact, this problem has to be looked at in many ways.

Let's start with the simpler ones, which are support, emotions, and isms. Chinese people have received a profound education in this regard, so many people are still very supportive of their country and nation, and the Chinese men's football team is no longer good is a symbol of China, and it is the feedback of the first movement in China. So supporting our own national team, in some ways, is indeed a way to support one's own country, and you can't say that you don't support your own country under any circumstances, right? Many people's "deep responsibility for love" for the national football team comes from this.

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

The second layer of logic is relatively complicated, and it is also the source of the actual development of sports. As Coubertin, the father of the Olympic Games, said, sport is universal, inclusive and universal. China is a sports country is really not a sports power, just a simple data, in 2021 the per capita competition venues announced by the Sports Federation have an area, which is not enough than the county town of Guizhou, the host of the village chao, which shows that most of our masses are unfamiliar with the gymnasium, have not played or been there. It's better in the city, maybe more opportunities and willing to spend money to go to the gym. Those with slightly worse economic conditions in rural areas can only be watched on television.

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

Therefore, the opportunity to participate in sports events, the main idea of many people is participation, not professional appreciation. If you look at the live audience captured by the camera, there may not be much to really understand, and everyone is enough to have fun. The national football game is relatively low threshold, and it does not need much money (compared to Argentina VS Australia) to watch, so many people use this equivalent as their own sports participation viewing channel to cash, they are really not keen on the green game at the scene, nor do they particularly want to support the national football team.

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

The third level of logic is fantasy, which mainly refers to the removal of the second level of relatively professional enthusiastic support for the national football team. Many people dream that "the national football team can get away with it", and they have not yet "real" experience the difference in results and the downward trend. After all, the national football game is not a season system, you have an N losing streak and you are completely finished; It's only a few months better than the last, and it's easy to forget. The previous embarrassment and bad performance have also been forgotten.

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

How many fans can tell what year the national football team lost to Thailand? Where is it? What competition? Who is the manager? Who scored the goal in the national team? All that everyone remembers is shame, but they don't remember the process. This can easily lead to the emergence of "relative fantasy".

One degree deep | The Chinese men's football team played so poorly, why would anyone go to watch the game?

Of course, here we also have to blame ourselves. The reason for the emergence of illusions and unrealistic misconceptions is closely related to the football media. Chinese football is not good, and the football media also bears a large part of the responsibility. It is precisely because we do not report well that the supporters have a biased understanding of the national football team, and the overall public opinion environment is relatively poor. This is the responsibility of the "microphone".

Read on