Publishing papers in academia is a top priority, and almost all titles and honors need a sufficient number of papers to support. As a leading figure in the field of biology, Yan Ning has always been synonymous with "genius girl", she is a legendary woman in Chinese academia, graduated from Princeton University in the United States at the age of thirty, and became the youngest female professor and the youngest doctoral supervisor of Tsinghua University after graduation, and is also a world-renowned biologist.
Yan Ning was "mad" again, and the paper was defiled, saying that he would rather throw away the garbage publication
Yan Ning dedicated her life to science, and she even gave up marriage and children for academic research, devoting everything to scientific research. Yan Ning's daily life is to conduct scientific research every day and then write papers, she will occasionally publish some of her views on life and scholarship on social platforms, and she also likes to discuss papers with other scholars.
Enhance your academic understanding and improve your research results. And Yan Ning is angry, it is precisely because her papers are "tarnished", the paper is not as casual as other genres of articles, it often requires a strong scientific nature, need to cite a large number of authoritative references, Yan Ning is angry because of the references.
Before Yan Ning published the paper, a "big guy" in the academic circle approached her, hoping that she could cite the wrong reference to achieve the high citation of this document. In the eyes of ordinary people, the quotation is quoted, what is worth worrying about? But although it is only a reference matter, Yan Ning's academic requirements for herself are also extremely high, and she has zero tolerance for this unreasonable demand, and she puts harsh words on her social platform, even if she does not publish, she will not compromise in the stillbirth. Academic papers are meant to be extremely scientific and accurate, if everyone cites the wrong references for the sake of profit, what will the academic circle become? The consequences are unimaginable.
Yan Ning's remarks on social platforms have been supported by countless scholars, and some scholars have left messages on Yan Ning's social platforms, saying that they have the same experience and have been forced to cite wrong references. Publishing a paper is a very long process, you need to send the written paper to the journal first, the journal will find experts in the field to comment, the original intention is to improve the content of the paper, reduce the error of the paper, but with the emergence of some "relationship papers", this review process gradually deteriorated.
A scholar forcibly "threatened" Yan Ning to cite erroneous documents, and the American academic circles were not innocent
Some experts and scholars who have established a firm foothold in academic circles use their power to force the publishers to join their unreasonable demands, otherwise they will not let the papers be published. This kind of behavior is called "hooligan behavior" in academic circles, and many grassroots scholars have experienced it, and there is nothing to do about this kind of behavior, and there are few tough people like Yan Ning, who are not afraid of power and are outspoken and dissatisfied.
Most other people dare to be angry, but Yan Ning is not the same, she is already a big man in the academic circle, even if she does not publish a paper for the time being, the impact on herself is not very large, but for some fledgling students, they are stuck in the key to life, such as master's degree thesis, if you do not pass the defense, review, you can not get a degree certificate, even the degree can not be saved, and what hard gas.
The reason why Yan Ning can speak so hard, the most important point is that she has a hard capital, other students encounter this kind of hooliganism, can only choose to compromise, want to solve this phenomenon, the simplest way, is to standardize academic requirements, to a certain extent to reduce the power of these experts, experts can correct mistakes, but can not be stuck without reason the paper can not be published, when these experts do not have "wanton power", what else to force others to add their own literature?
This is a debatable system, this system needs to be continuously improved, you can use the method of increasing the third-party approval process, reduce the occurrence of this kind of thing, the more people involved, it is possible to stop this hooligan behavior, after all, every expert is a person with a head and a face in the academic circle, if you are poked out of these "ugly acts", you will not feel good.
In the face of an unfair system, we must dare to speak up, even if we do not have Yan Ning's strength, we must tell others about our own experiences, provide reference for others, and let other scholars take this as a warning and not make the same mistakes. In addition, for fledgling students, I suggest that you make more use of the resources of your classmates and tutors, consult with them more when things happen, and learn from each other's strengths, rather than thinking about it alone. The road to the standardized development of the academic circle is still a long way to go, "purifying" the environment of the academic circle is also everyone's responsibility, we must not only be responsible for our own papers, but also responsible for the literature cited by ourselves, every student has the right to publish papers, and every excellent paper should not be blocked for no reason.