Do electric cars really save money than fuel cars?
In recent years, there has been a debate in the automobile market, that is, whether pure electric vehicles save money than fuel vehicles. In fact, from the cost of the car, pure trams are definitely more economical than fuel vehicles, because electricity is much cheaper than fuel, especially in the recent period of oil prices soaring, it is more obvious. However, some people say that when selling cars, pure trams will spit out the money saved, and indeed pure trams are not as good as fuel vehicles in terms of retention rate, but we should not forget that pure trams are driving for a longer time, the more money they save, if they drive at the same time to scrap, then fuel vehicles will spend several times more than pure trams. Some people will say that pure tram batteries are expensive, so you can buy a car that provides a lifetime warranty of three electricity, such as AION S Plus in Aian, which provides a lifetime warranty of three electricity. Let's see what the users of this car say!
Purchase model: AION S Plus 80 Technology Edition
Date of purchase: October 2021
Naked car purchase price: 172,600
Electricity consumption: 17.5 kWh / 100 km
Current driving: 865 km
[The most intentional place]: for new energy vehicles I am more concerned about battery life, endurance in this aspect determines how far I can run, I am mostly running in the city, occasionally run a long way is almost 400 meters, Aion S's actual endurance at high speed running 400 is still OK, the table shows that there are still dozens of kilometers to find charging piles, but generally are home charged.
【The most dissatisfied place】: Individuals do not like the form of touch buttons, personal or prefer the traditional actual buttons, easy to operate. And although the touch panel is good-looking, it is easy to stain fingerprints.
【Reasons to choose this car】: After seeing a lot of cars, I finally chose this car, I feel that the cost performance of many cars is not as high as this car, and the car is big and beautiful.
[Space] (5 stars): The use of space is perfect, the height of the front row is about 185cm, the driver's head is almost on top; and the seats are the lowest, and the height will be very depressing when driving at a high level. A rear ride is also sufficient.
【Power】(4 stars): The throttle is sufficient; acceleration shifting is also a common thing, and overtaking is also leveraged! Of course, his car still has to be leisurely; slowly begin to understand that he loves him.
[Control] (5 stars): The control of the car feels very good, this car is also very easy to drive, although the car is large but not bulky, driving is very easy and stable.
【Power consumption】 (5 stars): In the urban area to run the situation can be more than 8, I don't know if the car is not running well, at that time after buying a car did not have a big high speed.
【Comfort】(4 stars): The comfort is very good, the seat is wide and comfortable, the wrapping is excellent, the chassis is also very solid, and I enjoy sitting in it very much.
【Appearance】(5 stars): The shape is very sporty, and the feeling of the front face can be described in six words: full, dignified and atmospheric, which is a transportation tool that is very suitable for female driving.
【Interior】(5 stars): The interior part is not too tall, but the workmanship is still worth affirming, and the overall can only belong to the current type of model medium to upper.
【Cost performance】(5 stars): The cost performance is much higher than that of the general fuel vehicle, regardless of the price advantage, and the later maintenance is also in place.
Which pure tram do you think saves the most money?
