Many users with high requirements for performance should be very familiar with a sentence, that is, blowing hard in the winter and collective nesting in the summer, only because the power consumption of mobile phone products is too large, and even reached the point where it is difficult to use normally.
Because the performance of the current mobile phone is further improved, but in the process of upgrading, the power consumption is ignored, resulting in many new machines just listed on the shelf life crash or excessive heat generation and other situations.
It can be said that in recent years, mobile phone products have seen some rollovers in performance, even if mobile phone manufacturers develop a new heat dissipation technology, it is difficult to completely suppress the heat.
Of course, today's Snapdragon 8 has a good result in various tests, and it is necessary to replace the foundry in the second half of the year, which can be said to be in a good direction.
You know, compared with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, the running score of the Snapdragon 8 has increased by about 1/4, and it is more stable, which shows that the control of the fever of the Snapdragon 8 is also more in place.
More importantly, there are many users who like the TSMC process very much, and think that the Qualcomm Snapdragon processor using the Samsung process is relatively large in heat generation, so many users are looking forward to it.
The previous market has been rumored that the Snapdragon 8 Plus is expected to use the TSMC process, I thought it would take a long time to get new news, but what I did not expect was that it was recently confirmed again.
It is reported that Qualcomm's flagship processors in the second half of this year and next year will be foundry by TSMC, and the power consumption control will be better.
That is to say, in the next few generations of products, Qualcomm Snapdragon and TSMC will have to cooperate in depth.
The key is that there have been previous exposures that the yield rate of TSMC FOUNDRies is higher than that of Samsung, taking the Snapdragon 8 Plus as an example, starting from the third quarter, there are more than 50,000 pieces of output per quarter, and the current yield has exceeded 70%.
At the same time, according to Qualcomm's naming rules, Qualcomm's commercial flagship chips in the second half of this year will be named Snapdragon 8 Gen1 Plus, and next year's flagship processor will be named Snapdragon 8 Gen2, which will be foundry by TSMC.
Coupled with the high yield rate, then after handing over to TSMC OEM, it is really good news for consumers.
However, for MediaTek processors, it feels like "spring is late".
Because the power control of the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 processor is not bad, and the Snapdragon 8 Plus processor has been on the road and the power control is very good.
However, MediaTek's market performance is very bad, not that the product is not strong enough, but the time to impact the market is too late, whether it is Tianji 9000 or Tianji 8000 series, it is later than Qualcomm Snapdragon.
After all, the first Snapdragon 8 Gen1 models have begun to reduce prices to increase the heat, and as a result, the first batch of Tianji 9000 models have not yet been officially sold.
What needs to be understood is that the strength of Tianji 9000 is not bad, in terms of CPU frequency, Tianji 9000 uses 3.05GHz X2 super core, 3 2.85GHz A76 large core, super core and large core frequency are higher than Snapdragon 8.
And the oppo Find X5 Pro Tianji edition of the running score has appeared in the Geekbench5 running score data, single-core score reached 1300 points, multi-core score reached about 4300 points.
Although OPPO's scheduling is more conservative, it is still the top camp of the current Android camp, and it is even 10% ahead of Snapdragon 8 in terms of CPU, which is also a strong place.
It is worth mentioning that the GPU specification of the Tianji 9000 is Mali-G710MC10 848MHz, and a higher main frequency is bound to bring higher power consumption, so the excessive bragging in the early stage may not be in line with the real experience.
The most important thing is that there is also breaking information that the first mass production machine of Tianji 8100 has been separated, and the Snapdragon 888 and Snapdragon 8 Gen1 have been compared in turn. Tianji's single-core score of 0.9K lags behind the Super Core Snapdragon, but the multi-core 4K puts the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 in seconds.
It can be said that there are many similar praises, and the result has not been able to wait for the new machine, so for users who urgently need to change the machine, they will naturally consider the Qualcomm Snapdragon model.
For users who are not in a hurry to change the machine, they may do waiting for the party, and even wait for the Snapdragon 8 Plus model to be born to make a comparison.
After all, the release time is too late, and when the real large-scale store is available, it may not be far from the Snapdragon 8 Plus model.
It can be seen that this year's MediaTek processor may appear to be untimely, which is also a true embodiment of getting up early and catching up with a late set.
If MediaTek's Tianji 9000, Tianji 8100 and Tianji 8000 can be attacked at the first time, then the point of view will be stronger.
So do you think mediatek is one step too late in the face of the rapid development of Qualcomm Snapdragon? Welcome to leave a message, like, share.