One set on the front and one set on the back has always been a true embodiment of the style of the US authorities in the international community. On the issue of the recent Conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the hidden attributes of this "duplicitous faction" of the United States can finally not be hidden, and it has decided to use its intelligence agencies to join the battle with assassination organizations. Following the onslaught of a "mysterious sniper" shot in a battle in Ukraine on March 2, maj. Gen. Andrey Sukhovetsky, deputy commander of russia's 41st Army and commander of the Seventh Airborne Division, there was a further earth-shattering plan in the U.S. Parliament to "assassinate" Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to the latest report from the Voice of America (VOA), although the White House repeatedly stressed on March 4 that US President Joe Biden does not advocate regime change in Russia, the voice of a US senator calling on Russians to assassinate President Putin is still very harsh, making people suspect that the "dark" forces such as the CIA have begun to intervene in the War in Ukraine and intend to use hidden agents inside Russia to carry out the "assassination plan". All indications show that what the United States is giving to the Ukrainian authorities at this stage is not only the support of war readiness, but also the support of intelligence agencies and the intervention of mercenary forces.
1. The cause of death of a senior Russian general is mysterious, and the United States is indispensable behind it.
As the saying goes, knowing oneself and knowing one's enemy is never lost in a hundred battles, but in modern warfare with a relatively high degree of informationization, whoever grasps first-hand intelligence will grasp the opportunity on the battlefield. The Ukrainian authorities know this, and Russian President Vladimir Putin knows this even more, so before the military operation against Ukraine on February 24, the Russian information warfare forces carried out a large-scale cyber attack on Ukraine on the 23rd, making the websites of many Ukrainian banks, the country's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Ministry of Defense inaccessible, which is equivalent to being "softly destroyed" by the Russian army. With the "hard destruction" of Russian missiles and aircraft, the Ukrainian military's command system has actually died in name only. However, it is strange that the war between the Ukrainian government army and the Russian army developed into March this year, and the Ukrainian military, which should have lost the ability to coordinate and command, "opened its eyes" as shown in the picture, and even accurately locked the exact position of Major General Andrei Sukhovsky in Ukraine.
According to a comprehensive report by Fox News and the Associated Press, Major General Sukhovitsky was killed by a Sniper of the Ukrainian Army at the age of 47 when he commanded Air Force Special Forces operations at Antonov Airport, 30 miles north of Kiev, on March 2. He is also the second person to be claimed to have been killed by Ukraine since the previous Chechen major general Mohammed Tushayev was officially confirmed dead in the same place by Ukraine, and the first senior general to be officially confirmed dead by Russia. Voradimir Omerian, a former Ukrainian infrastructure minister who joined the Kiev militia, told Fox on March 3, "We shot him." Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA official and station chief, also told Fox: "If this is true, it would be big news." It can strengthen the firm resolve of the Ukrainian army and represent a tactical victory. The incident was eventually confirmed by the Russian Paratroopers Association, spokespersons and Russian media, and Sergei Chipilev, a member of the Russian officers' group, posted on the social media platform VKontakte: "We are very sad to learn the tragic news of the death of our friend Major General Andrei Sukhovecki in Ukraine during the special operation." ”
So the question arises, how did the Ukrainian government forces accurately know the location of Major General Andrei Sukhovecki in the event of a fatal blow to the chain of command, and use snipers to carry out precision strikes against them under the close protection of the Russian army? There is only one answer, that is, the intervention and help of the US military. And some media pointed out that its modus operandi was the same as the assassination of Major General Qasem Soleimani of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, The Iranian nuclear physicist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, and the senior commander of iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, Muslim Shahdan.
2) The White House denies the plan to assassinate Putin, but the CIA is indeed in Moscow.
If the death of Major General Andrei Sukhovecki is just the beginning, then the "loud conspiracy" of the US parliament to assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin is likely to be the climax of the Ukraine crisis. According to information from voice of America, the plan to "assassinate" Putin was first proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, who repeated the statement to anchor Hannity in a televised interview on Thursday (March 3) that "someone in Russia" should assassinate President Putin, and then repeated the statement to anchor Hannity in a television interview on Fox News Channel on Friday. Graham pointed out: "Does Russia have Brutus? Is there a more successful Colonel Stauffenberg in the Russian army? The only person who can solve this problem is the Russian people. How will this end? Someone in Russia must come forward ... Get rid of this guy. According to historical records, Brutus assassinated the Roman ruler Julius Caesar, while the German officer Colonel Stauffenberg plotted to assassinate german leader Hitler in July 1944, but without success.
As soon as this statement came out, it was immediately strongly condemned by the Russian side, and the Russian ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antoniov, responded: "Graham's comments are unacceptable and shameless, which shows that the hatred of the United States against Russia is beyond people's imagination." U.S. officials must give an explanation, and the Russian side strongly condemns this criminal claim. In response, White House press secretary Jen Psaki clarified to reporters on March 4, saying that "this is not the position of the US government, and certainly not a statement from anyone who works for this administration." Meanwhile, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, also said Graham's proposal was "a very bad idea," while Rep. Ilhan Omar, Democrat of Minnesota, tweeted, "Is this true?" It is reported that Graham once proposed a bill in Congress to condemn Putin and his military commanders for committing "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" in Ukraine, and the recent "assassination plan" is a major political signal that he will turn condemnation into action. Is Graham just "talking casually" or does the US authorities really have plans to "assassinate Putin"? After the bizarre sniping of senior generals like Major General Andrei Sukhovecki, we have reason to believe that Graham's remarks are not empty. The United States does have the ability to continue the Previous Trump administration's "decapitation operation" in Iran in Ukraine, and how many CIA agents are lurking in the Kremlin at present, even Putin himself, a member of the National Security Council (KGB), is difficult to say. For his own security reasons, putin the Great has kept a distance of several meters from everyone in recent days, whether he has met with Western heads of state or met with his staff to discuss Ukraine.
As the saying goes, the open gun is easy to hide, the dark arrow is difficult to defend, KGB Putin is very clear, when he stares into the abyss, the abyss is also staring at you, while Russia stepped into the abyss of war, he is also trying to avoid himself and the country becoming the target of the "dark forces" led by the United States. Probably because of Putin's jealousy of the "assassination," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky openly choked Putin in a Speech on March 3, hoping to sit at the negotiating table with the other side. Zelenskiy said: "I have time, sit down with me, but not 30 meters apart, as you did when you met Macron or Scholz. I am your neighbor. I don't bite, I'm a normal person, sit down with me, come and talk, what are you afraid of? Obviously, he was talking about it, and in disguise, he laughed at the guy who used to "ride a bear with bare arms" and had already instigated it, and there was a lot of dog fighting and fox power. But discerning people know that the credibility of Zelenskiy's government is declining. As of now, he is still hiding in the Middle East in underground shelters throughout Ukraine, and using pre-recorded videos to coax his own people into believing that he is still "standing with his own people", which is really disgraceful.
In response to the much-debated "Assassination of the United States," U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken also replied when asked whether the United States sought to change the regime in Russia, saying: "We don't seek that, and it doesn't depend on us anyway." The Russian people need to decide their leaders. They need to decide whether their leaders are really driving and representing their needs, their interests, their wishes. It's definitely not up to us. Whether President Putin is a rational man or living in fantasy, I have no way of understanding. All I can do is measure Russia and President Putin in action and respond effectively to his actions as much as I can. What is very unusual is that almost everything that President Putin has said over the years that he wants to stop is actually driven by his actions, including his years of wanting to tear NATO apart, but he has brought it together like never before; he wants to bring Ukraine to Russia's knees, but he makes the Ukrainian people an unprecedented enemy. Ultimately, any path forward involving diplomacy will be decided first and foremost by the Ukrainian people and the government that represents it in a democratic way, and we will support any direction they want to go. Judging from the statements of the US authorities, they do not want to monopolize the merits of assassinating senior Russian generals, but in the way of the black hand, they give the credit for the assassination of Major General Andrei Sukhovsky to the Ukrainian government forces, and classify the action of assassinating the Russian state leader as a so-called "just act" of the "Russian people" in order to assassinate the Russian state leader.
U.S. lawmakers offered to "assassinate" Putin to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, but the White House denied it. Whether the United States dares to do it or not is one thing, and whether it can do it or not is another thing. And judging by the bizarre death of Major General Andrei Sukhovitsky while commanding the operation in Kiev, the Americans did intervene and successfully completed the first killing of the core leadership of the Russian army (First Blood). Sukhovetsky's death not only severely damaged the morale of the Russian army, but also brought the special forces operations under his leadership to a standstill. According to Ukrainian authorities, Zelenskiy claimed to have been assassinated by a Russian special forces on February 25 and hastily issued an emergency mobilization order to strengthen forces in Kiev and other places. The U.S. authorities also believe that Sukhovetsky is very likely to have led this series of "fox hunting operations" and regarded it as the "primary eradication target". It is worth mentioning that since the Crimean crisis in 2014, the United States has vigorously supported the "Azov Special Operations Detachment" that has been incorporated into the Ukrainian National Guard, and sent mercenaries to guide these "quasi-NATO forces" to fight pro-Russian militants in the eastern region. In addition to military support, the U.S. agents installed within the Russian leadership are now constantly transferring the latest command intelligence and strategic plans of the Russian military to the Ukrainian authorities, enabling them to barely fight even when they lose their command capabilities. Although on the surface, the Russian military is only facing a small country in Ukraine, it is far higher than its opponents in terms of overall combat effectiveness and modernization. But in essence, the Russian military has already made direct moves with the "quasi-NATO forces" led by the United States, and has lost a major general in recent confrontations. In this context, the pressure on Putin the Great can be imagined, and maintaining a safe distance from foreign heads of state and domestic staff is also to prevent the real threat of enemy activities.