The names of Ozawa, Xiaopu, and Xiaobai are not clever. Recently, due to the Ukrainian crisis, Zelenskiy and Putin as the presidents of the countries concerned, and Biden as the president of the United States, because of the influence of the three of them in this crisis, have often become the objects of ridicule and ridicule by netizens. In the comments, the names of the little "Ze (Zelensky)", the little "Pu (Putin)", the small "Bai (Biden)" all came out.
This kind of ridicule seems funny, but in fact, it does not make people laugh at all, but it seems very improper. For these three people, you can dislike or even hate them, even if you don't call them president, but you can always call them by their first name, right? Why use that kind of very informal language with small "Ze" and small "Pu"?
In China, Xiao Zhang, Xiao Wang, and Xiao Li are called a kind of affectionate title, generally also the title of the elders to the juniors, and the leaders to the subordinates. Moreover, this kind of name exists in China, but not in foreign countries (I did not check the information, I don't know if some countries have it). Most of foreigners' surnames and personal names are first and surnames last, which is very different from the chinese name. So, if this is the case, why should we call foreigners by the name of Chinese?
As for the titles of foreigners, official reports are very formal, such as Xinhua News Agency, People's Daily, CCTV, they will call these three presidents, President Zelensky, President Putin, President Biden.
And like some netizens' jokes about these three presidents, it is okay for a few old men on the side of the road to gossip about the international situation, but it is not okay to post on the Internet. Such a title is not on the table, and it is also very unserious. In terms of the titles of foreigners, although they are not necessarily as formal as the official, they should still learn from the official, and it is still necessary to be more formal.
Moreover, the debate on the position of international issues should have been discussed on the basis of facts, even if the viewpoints are different, it should be discussed rationally, even if it is possible to debate fiercely, but on the premise of not making personal attacks, it is not right to do the right thing. Because even if you make a personal attack, there is no benefit to the discussion of the problem. Moreover, if you make personal attacks on others, others will not spare you; it is very cool when you attack others, and you are not happy when others attack you, then only you know.
Creators in the headlines in particular should not use radical language. Because you still have to create in the headlines, but also to communicate and interact with the readers, every time you speak, every comment, the readers have a number in mind. Although they are the silent majority, they have a scale in their hearts, there is right and wrong, there is justice, and although they do not say it, they will have an evaluation in their hearts for everything you say. What kind of image should be established in the minds of the readers, and they should have a spectrum in their hearts, rather than blindly following the trend.
