Does NATO, which has provoked the situation in Russia and Ukraine, really have to sit on the sidelines in the face of today's situation in Ukraine?

If you say what is the biggest melon in 2022? Then the Russian blitzkrieg on Ukraine can be said to be the biggest melon. Until February 24, Ukraine had a fierce look and talked about re-possessing nuclear weapons, as if it were going to compete with Russia and decide whether to live or die. However, Zelenskiy, the actor president, may not have expected that what he exchanged for this verbal cannon was not Russia's concessions, but putin's steel punch to his clown, which directly made Zelensky dizzy.

Caught off guard, Ukraine wants to stand up to Russia on its own, which cannot be said to be a fool's dream, at least a pipe dream, and his only choice is to turn to his NATO allies in the hope that NATO can lend a helping hand. Yet his beloved NATO allies have not released a fart, nothing but verbal assistance. In a word, NATO countries have chosen to watch from the sidelines.

Why is NATO meddling in the situation between Russia and Ukraine?

Strictly speaking, this is a very puzzling thing, in the past, the NATO countries led by the United States have frequently mobilized troops, constantly exaggerated the news that Russia is about to invade Ukraine, and sent a large number of weapons and ammunition to the Ukrainian army, repeatedly instigating Ukraine to launch an attack on the militia in East Ukraine, as if as long as Ukraine launches an attack, then NATO troops will immediately follow.

However, when Russia launched an offensive, NATO was a shrunken-headed turtle, only willing to provide all assistance except help, although there is unconfirmed news that Biden is considering sending more troops to Europe, but overall this is still a blank check, which is not counted.

In short, nato countries now have no idea of helping Ukraine, and it can even be said that history is repeating itself, and the latest copy of the European windsweet war sit-in 2.0 seems to be online. Is NATO really going to sit back and watch Ukraine being defeated by Russia?

In fact, for NATO countries, provoking the situation in Russia and Ukraine and further exacerbating the conflict in Ukraine is just a means, and its real purpose is naturally for the benefit of profit. After the repeated tossing and turning of the epidemic and various anti-epidemic disadvantages, NATO member countries have fallen into an economic winter and social turmoil.

The various antics of the United Kingdom after Brexit naturally need not be said, Johnson is already in a state of anxiety. France's Macron may be slightly better, but in the state of the epidemic, the French economy is also shaky. Needless to say, while the epidemic is high, the United States has not less natural and man-made disasters, and the economic stagnation has made the situation of the United States worse.

If such a big country as Britain, France and the United States is still like this, countries such as Poland and Romania do not need to say more, how to find some filling for the country, or inject a dose of stimulant, has become a top priority for these countries. In the Western world, transferring domestic contradictions to the outside world through wars and other means is not a new trick, but a means they commonly use. Moreover, there are anti-Russian plots in Europe and the United States, and there is no psychological obstacle to Attacking Russia, and it can even be said that it is a tradition, which allows them to unscrupulously intervene in the situation in Russia and Ukraine and try to make profits for themselves.

What does NATO want?

In the past few months, NATO countries led by the United States have continued to deploy military forces to Ukraine, Poland, Romania and other countries, saying that Russia will invade Ukraine, as if it is "to get justice for Ukraine". But in the final analysis, this is just a means, the purpose of course can not be to help Ukraine to do anything, then NATO is not an idealist, where will its soldiers fight for Ukraine, a country that cannot be beaten by eight poles? Their help to Ukraine is fake, and making money is real.

NATO's idea is actually very simple, hoping to force Russia to make concessions in some aspects by playing up Russia and constantly increasing troops, including but not limited to making Russia give up support for the East Ukrainian militia organization and spitting out Crimea, so that Russia's power can fully withdraw into Russia.

In this way, they can crush Russia without firing a single shot, or Russian President Vladimir Putin. After all, Putin has a consistent tough guy image, and if Putin has a half-point concession on the Ukraine issue, then this will be a huge blow to Putin's prestige, and it is not impossible for him to lose support and completely step down.

If Putin's position in Russia is shaken, then NATO countries led by the United States can take the opportunity to make many demands. These demands may include, but are not limited to, allowing Russia to make economic concessions to NATO countries, so that all kinds of capitalists, especially those on Wall Street in the United States, can enter Russia as much as they want and divide Up Russia's resources and wealth.

Please note that this is not an empty story, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western capital frantically entered the former Soviet union countries, arbitrarily dividing up the state-owned property that belonged to these countries, and the seven oligarchs who once called for rain in Russia are the spokesmen of Western capitalists in Russia.

It can be seen from this that many actions in NATO countries, whether they are fanning the wind and igniting the fire, or deploying a large number of troops to Russia's neighboring countries, are essentially an act of extortion, no different from the land scoundrels who want to protect the money on the street, they are all holding sticks and whining, shouting and drinking six to extort money. The so-called difference is nothing more than that NATO countries use so-called "morality" to decorate their actions, and make themselves look noble under the guise of freedom and human rights, but in the final analysis, they are all the same hooliganism.

NATO is difficult to ride the tiger

However, what NATO never expected was that instead of retreating, Russia took the most direct measures to eliminate the threat. For Russia, this is an alternative – when ill-intentioned people extend their knives to you, you always have to punch them and make these ill-intentioned people retreat. Russia hopes to disarm Ukraine's military forces in a short period of time by means of a short war, to put Ukraine in a state of "demilitarization" and to abort the plans of NATO countries.

It is conceivable that Russia's move is something that NATO countries have not anticipated, and many of NATO's actions can only be regarded as military blackmail, hoping to frighten Russia itself and submit to them and let them be slaughtered. But when Russia really launched a fierce attack and was determined to break the situation by force, NATO was a little overwhelmed.

Can NATO use its military might to go to war with Russia? The answer is yes, NATO's military strength in Europe is already very strong, if Poland and Romania as offensive positions, to launch a pincer offensive against Russia burst into Ukraine, by cutting off or threatening the supply line to force its withdrawal is completely possible.

But the question is not whether it can be done, but how costly it is to do it? Far from it, Germany is already the first victim, and the interruption of the Nord Stream 2 project is imminent, which is in line with NATO's "political correctness", but the price is to be borne by Germany with real money and silver, if it really wants to break out in a frontal conflict with Russia, I am afraid that the German government is unwilling.

France has previously consulted with Russia on the Ukrainian issue, but the results are far from good, and sending troops to participate in the chaos in Ukraine is not something france is happy to see.

Needless to say, the former "Empire that Never Sets" is now devastated, and even a brigade-level armored unit may not be able to get together, so why fight Russia? Even the United States, which is as strong as the world's largest military power, has no spare strength to fight a war with Russia in the case of internal and external troubles and domestic epidemics everywhere, right? If U.S. President Joe Biden does order the U.S. military to fully intervene and fight a war of steel and blood with the Russian army, then Biden's presidency is likely to be shaken, and Congress may not give him the authorization to go to war.

It can be said that NATO at this time is like an alliance with different ghost fetuses, which may have the same interests on the surface, but in fact, it is impossible to unite the troops and fight one family, not to mention that their national strength is now much worse than before, and it is impossible to bear the cost of war with Russia.

But then again, if NATO cannot make any military response, only to stay on diplomatic condemnation and economic sanctions, rather than making practical actions to save Ukraine's decline, then this means that NATO, a powerful military bloc, has become strong in the middle, and this is also unbearable for NATO countries led by the United States, and there is also a huge blow to the international prestige and credibility of these countries themselves.

We might as well put it simply, NATO is now in a state of difficulty in riding the tiger - if it fights russia to the death for Ukraine, then all the costs of the war must be borne by NATO countries themselves, the economy in the cold winter is naturally unbearable, the domestic opposition forces will become their weakness, and NATO governments may be impeached, or the support rate will decline.

However, if we adopt a sit-and-watch attitude and watch Ukraine being defeated by Russia, then NATO will become a complete joke, and it will naturally be more difficult to make some big moves in the future. Faced with this dilemma, NATO countries are like needles and felts, but there are not many options left for them.

epilogue

In summary, it is not difficult to understand why NATO countries have turned a blind eye to Ukraine's call for help and adopted such a passive attitude that almost acquiesced to Russia's mobilization of troops.

To put it bluntly, NATO now has more than enough and is not strong enough, and can only hope that Ukraine itself can stand up to it, delay or slow down the speed of Russia's offensive and the morale of troops, so that NATO may also use a decent way to make Russia retreat, thus becoming a victory in public opinion of the "Russian-Ukrainian conflict".

But if Ukraine is really defeated, then NATO will not pay any price for Ukraine, but will change to profit from Ukraine in the future.

As for Ukraine caught in the flames of war, it can only become a victim of NATO, and there will be no good outcome regardless of victory or defeat. As Ukrainian President Zelenskiy said, Ukraine has been abandoned. After all, a pawn who is willing to be a pawn for NATO will not be cared about. This is evident from the puppets that nato has supported.