It is easy to return when booking, you say what era this is, and now buying a car will still appear in this situation. If it is because of the buyer's own reasons, it may be understandable, but if the sales consultant induces the order through false promises, and then the buyer finds that he has been deceived and unsubscribes, shouldn't this be a refund of the deposit?
At present, the problem of Geely Kr 001 inducing consumers to not refund the deposit after placing an order is still fermenting, from January of this year, there have been continuous complaints from the owner of the order, as of February 24, there are still the owner of the order in the continuous complaint, it seems that Geely Kr has not dealt with these things or given a reasonable solution.
As of February 24, Geely Krypton 001 has been complained about the fifth place in the pure electric vehicle complaint list because of the non-fulfillment of promises and deposit disputes. A new brand and a new model frequently appear on the list, and because of one thing is constantly being complained about, but the official still has not given a solution, is this not known or do not want to solve it at all?
User unsubscribe will definitely affect the sales of Geely Kr, and then affect the progress of its listing, in order to list the progress of Geely Kr is to rush forward with a hard scalp or to pull down the face to deal with these things?
If a brand can't even settle a deposit dispute, how many people dare to order it?