In the past few days, the Internet is basically discussing the posts and articles of the No. 1 Document of the Central Committee, which is enough to see the weight of the "No. 1 Document", and it can also be seen that netizens, especially the vast number of peasant friends, have concerned and expected the "No. 1 Document".
First, the pronunciation of "long" in "long teeth"
The ten polysyllabic words for "long" in "long teeth" read "zhang" and "chang" at the first. Reading "zhang" means to grow and grow; and reading "chang" means length. According to the meaning of the text, I think it should be read "zhang", which means to grow out, and "long teeth" means to grow teeth. Corresponds to the word "hard" in the title. That is, the measures to protect cultivated land should be like "teeth" that can not only "bite", but also "bite pain". It is the measures you have put in place that are useful and effective, and can make those who destroy the arable land afraid. The measures you formulate must be mandatory and punitive, and only such measures like "teeth" can maintain the "red line of 1.8 billion mu of arable land".
Second, where is the "hard" of hard measures like "teeth"?
The document says, "The party and government share the same responsibility, strict assessment, one vote veto, and lifelong accountability." What is "party-government responsibility"? It is that the party committee and the government share the responsibility, and when things go wrong, they are held accountable and punished. In the past, matters related to farmland protection were under the management of government departments, and government departments were also responsible for problems. For example, when there was a problem with the land in the township, in the past it was only the responsibility of the township mayor, and the secretary seemed to have no responsibility, and he could also make big things small and small things small. Now that it has been changed to "the party and the government share the same responsibility," it is impossible to "turn big things into small things" anymore.
"Strict assessment, one vote veto, lifelong accountability." This one is also very powerful. No matter how big your political achievements are, no matter how good your work in other aspects, if, after assessment, as long as you violate the red line of "farmland protection", you will veto it. The most powerful thing is the measure of "lifelong accountability". In the past, there was a phenomenon that no matter how big the problem was when you were in office, as long as you didn't find it, retired or transferred, you would be fine, and you could land safely. But now it has changed, lifelong accountability, even if you have retired, leave, as long as the East Window incident, will be held responsible, be punished as it should be. Over the past few years, the investigation and punishment of many retired cadres is proof of this.
What other "teeth" measures are there?
For "farmland protection", in document No. 1, in addition to the above tough measures, there are also the following measures.
(1) Classify and clarify the use of cultivated land, and strictly give priority to grain, oil, sugar and vegetables. First of all, we must abide by the priority of the use of arable land, that is, the cultivated land must first be used to grow grain, cotton, oil, sugar, vegetables and forage feed. Cultivated land is divided into three categories: general farmland, permanent basic farmland, and high-standard farmland. "General farmland" is given priority in growing grain, but can be used for other non-agricultural land; "permanent basic farmland" is mainly used for grain production; and "high-standard farmland" is used for grain production in principle.
(2) Fruit forestry goes up the mountain and does not compete with grain for land. Why is there such a measure? In the past, because of the low return on growing grain, some places developed fruit forestry on permanent basic farmland, and in order to achieve "land balance", they sold the permanent basic farmland on flat land to developers, and then replaced the basic farmland with wasteland on the mountain, so as to fool the "policy of balance of arable land".
(3) Increase the intensity of law enforcement and punishment, and carry out special rectification pilot projects for the construction of houses in rural areas. The use of cultivated land for non-agricultural construction in rural areas and the indiscriminate occupation of cultivated land for housing construction is a stubborn disease that will not be cured for a long time. Document No. 1 proposes to carry out special rectification pilots, indicating that the state is determined to tackle this stubborn disease.
(4) Prevent risks arising from the circulation of industrial and commercial capital to rural land. After the rural land reform enters the deep-water area, it is a good thing to allow urban industrial and commercial capital to enter the rural land circulation market, but there are also risks. It is that some capital groups use the circulating land for non-agricultural construction under the banner of "agriculture", bringing risks to the rice bowl of 1.4 billion people, which is also a measure emphasized in document No. 1. It is to strictly audit and strictly supervise.
In short, the red line of 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land is the most basic guarantee to ensure the rice bowl of 1.4 billion people, and the No. 1 document of the Central Committee in 2022 puts forward a number of tough measures to "grow teeth" in the protection of cultivated land, which is a strong guarantee to ensure the red line of 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land.