When mentioning the "Classic of Mountains and Seas", can we not use the word "myth" to summarize, leaving aside the myth, four thousand years ago can describe the mountains and rivers on the earth very accurately, in addition to the "Classic of Mountains and Seas" and that work? As far as the descriptions of the many mountains and rivers in the Classic of Mountains and Seas are concerned, such a large amount of work, without a world map, ordinary people today are estimated to be unable to complete it in a lifetime. It is not difficult to record mountains, it is not difficult to record rivers, it is very difficult to record the minerals of each mountain, most of the minerals of the mountains are hidden in the mountains, and if you want to mine, you must remove the trees and vegetation on the mountains, and then mine them, so the author of the "Classic of Mountains and Seas" must have received the help of many people, one of which is the mountain god of each mountain.
