laitimes

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

With the 2022 season of the Chinese Super League about to start, many clubs have made no small move. The two promotion teams have officially announced the joining of 3 players, in addition to foreign aid, there are former international footballers, Wuhan Three Towns and Zhejiang Greentown have shown a lot of amplitude in the Chinese Super League. The main reason is that the former local tycoon teams have appeared "bronze effect". Guangzhou's top salary will be reduced to 600,000, which is likely to drive more teams to follow suit. Of course, many fans believe that Guangzhou's move indicates that the stock reform has failed, and it may also be that many parties are playing a game.

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

Bronze effect? Guangzhou's top salary of 600,000 yuan has driven the reform of the Chinese Super League

Guangzhou's withdrawal from the maximum salary of 600,000 did not cause an uproar among fans and the media, after all, such a setting has a certain reason.

First, the actual situation of the Guangzhou team is that it is heavily indebted, and the parent company also has a serious financial crisis. The club's development towards the road of "self-financing" is imperative and necessary. It is reported that guangzhou team has suffered a serious deficit in recent years, and the salaries of players account for the vast majority. Therefore, a pay cut is "imperative".

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

Second, the Chinese men's football team lost the "Round of 12", and the international team actually lost to the Vietnamese team. The value and market value of these players have fallen sharply, which is inversely proportional to the fighting spirit and achievements shown by the Chinese women's football team. Therefore, a sharp reduction in salary, even from ten million annual salary to 600,000, is reasonable.

Third, the Chinese Super League market has been much worse than before, and the rules of football managers "patting their heads" have made the club powerless, and at the same time weakened the confidence of new investors because of the "neutral" name change.

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

Who's wronged? When the stock reform fails or the game goes on

The Chinese Super League is so depressed, if you want to go down, you can only pass the "stock reform", who is willing to do this "unjust head" has become a "world problem". In fact, most of the clubs in the Chinese Super League have not completed the "stock reform", and the relatively stable distance is supported by state-owned enterprises. In view of the attributes of enterprises, state-owned enterprise clubs can be closer in the "Golden Dollar Football" period and show strong strength in the "Bronze Football" period. Of course, there are also many clubs close to completing the "share reform", such as Shenzhen Football Team, Henan Songshan Longmen, Guangzhou City Team and so on.

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

The trend of "stock reform" is general, but the Guangzhou team has implemented the strongest salary cut in history, and it is likely that there are only two. First, the share reform failed. The Guangzhou team has invested heavily in the past decade, and there is also a Guinness Book of Records-breaking football school. If new investors are unwilling to acknowledge Guangzhou's past, then the original investors will lodge a strong protest; second, stock correction is in the game. Taking the initiative to reduce wages is similar to the rhythm of the previous "Lao Wang", and the initiative of public opinion is forced to obey.

Bronze effect? Guangzhou team's maximum salary of 600,000 yuan drove the reform of the Chinese Super League, and the stock reform failed or the game was carried out

As the saying goes: "Saion lost his horse and knew that it was not a blessing." Chinese football has once again fallen into a trough, and the Chinese Super League has been seriously implicated. In order to survive, the "eight champions" directly used the lowest salary system in history, and the maximum salary of 60,000 to 600,000 may make most of the main players leave the team. Of course, the "bronze effect" is still continuing, and it may also be the cornerstone of a new round of ascent.

Read on