Honestly this is not a rigorous comparison, perhaps in addition to the CPU are Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or based on 855, the two devices are actually running different systems on different platforms, so this comparison can not fully show the performance difference of the chip itself.
But aside from the inherent differences between mobile and car-grade chips, the projects and features I experienced on the Samsung Note10+ and Roewe RX5 MAX were the same, including fluency in use, voice assistants, and the most common applications.
From a feeling point of view, although note10+ was released in 2019 and RX5 MAX was released in 2021, the mobile phone will indeed be better in terms of the use experience brought by these two screens alone.
After all, as the flagship mobile phone of the year, the configuration of Note10+ is indeed too anti-heavenly. 12G of running memory is more than my notebook, the performance of 8 core frequency 2.84Ghz is still enough at the moment, coupled with the positioning of Android Emperor brings the top screen, the "elderly" Note10+ brings a better experience.
As for the car side, although the RX5 MAX is a new car, it will still be inferior to many smartphones in terms of running memory capacity, main frequency and screen quality. Because the biggest difference between the mobile end and the car specification level is the stability, we can accept that the mobile phone crashes, it is not a big deal to restart, but the car machine is not OK. Therefore, in order to ensure the stability of operation, the vehicle-grade chip may reduce the performance in exchange for stability.
However, in terms of voice assistants, the current ability of the car-side voice assistant is actually far beyond the mobile terminal. Faster recognition speeds, more functions, and more powerful understanding are all advantages of the car-side voice assistant. Of course, the ability of voice assistants does not have much to do with the CPU, and mainly relies on voice chips and logic algorithms.
For Qualcomm, the current generation difference between the vehicle specification level and the mobile terminal chip is probably in the 2 to 3 generations, that is to say, the mobile phone chip introduced to the market 2 years ago will be officially mass-produced to the car machine today. If you know Moore's Law, you will have the feeling that the car level is very backward.
But whether it is the Snapdragon 8155 that is gradually becoming popular at present, or the Snapdragon 8195 that will be mass-produced this year, we don't actually have to worry about the performance of these seemingly "backward" chips. Because their performance is enough to cope with the use of the car machine environment, unless you insist on playing the full picture quality original god on the car machine screen.
Of course, for mobile chips, if Apple can match the A-series processors or even M1 chips that exist like bugs to the car side, that experience may be more exciting.