Good Doctor Online was accused of firing lactating employees, responding: Eligible for dismissal, the statutory lactation period has ended

Three words of finance and economics on February 10 news, recently, some netizens broke the news that the good doctor online a breastfeeding mother fever, leave not to give approval, but also asked to go to the post, and then she gave feedback in a large group, the result was kicked out of the group chat, and finally the enterprise WeChat checked that there was no such person.

In this regard, Song Shuangbin, HR director of Good Doctor Online, responded today that the news is untrue, the employee meets the conditions for dismissal, the employee took more than 6 months of leave for physical discomfort and other reasons during pregnancy in 2020, and in 2021, it constituted absenteeism twice, and clarified that the employee's statutory lactation period has ended.

The following is the original text of the intranet post:

Dear friends, I want to share with Tianjia about my today's events, breastfeeding blocking milk night fever 38.5, leave is not forced to ask to work, after arriving at the post the company in the spirit of responsible for my body to take me to the Union Hospital fever consultation to do nucleic acid, by dry need to wait 2 to 4 hours family worried about the infection will take me out of the hospital.

In the afternoon under the premise of nucleic acid negative was told that need to go to the Union Hospital fever clinic again to the department leader *** has not answered, helpless to the unit to coordinate whether it can be in accordance with the company's staff manual to the nearest three-A hospital for treatment, not approved, said that it is necessary to go to the Union Hospital, and asked to go tonight, due to the current fever of 39 degrees can not go to the hospital, there is a one-year-old child at home unattended, many times ask the company can see a doctor near the third- class, or take a leave of absence tomorrow to see a doctor, the family good people to see the child, are not photographed accurately, I thank the company for helping me find a good hospital, but tonight no one at home to take care of the child can not be treated alone, please help me to plead, I have a fever need to take a day off to see a doctor, the staff manual requires a day of sick leave more than two hospitals can be, and from this afternoon 4:30 to the present, I am still feverish 382.

The following is the full text of the official reply:

【Background】

1. In 2020, during the pregnancy of this employee, he or she took more than 6 months of leave for reasons such as physical discomfort. During this period, the company understood and agreed to rest at home, and colleagues in the department always made up shifts to let them rest in peace. After the employee went to work, he continued to take leave on the grounds of various physical discomforts and without hospital sick leave, and the company understood and allowed it. However, he did not thank his colleagues for their concern and dedication, and then left his post without authorization, which seriously affected the normal operation of the business.

2. On October 16, 2021, the employee left the post without authorization without completing the leave procedures, which constituted absenteeism. After being criticized and educated by his superiors, he promised to abide by the leave system in the future. After that, the superior manager began to strengthen his counseling, emphasizing that the leave of absence must comply with the company's procedures.

3. On December 20, 2021, the failure to perform the leave procedures again and not to work again constituted absenteeism, and the reason for the sick leave proposed afterwards was suspected of being fraudulent. In response to this situation, the company, in accordance with the provisions of the employee handbook, informed him that after January 19, 2022, if he took sick leave, he would have to go to the hospital designated by the company to issue a sick leave slip.

4. Special clarification: The employee's statutory lactation period has ended.

【Facts of this incident】

1. On the morning of February 9, the employee said that he had a fever and asked for leave. In view of the fact that there is no sick leave and his last sick leave is suspected of being fraudulent, the company arranged for two colleagues to accompany him to The Union Hospital. During the period, give full care and attention, taxi and other expenses are borne by the company.

2. Since it is during the epidemic period, according to the hospital regulations, fever patients must first visit the fever clinic, give simple treatment, and after the nucleic acid test is negative, according to the specific condition, then transfer to a specialist. During the fever clinic, the employee's husband, on the grounds of fear of cross infection, made a big fuss in the hospital clinic, and then forcibly stopped seeing the doctor, and the two left the hospital together.

3. Considering that the employee's medical treatment in the morning was interrupted, no diagnosis and treatment was carried out, if there was a real fever, it was more serious to worry about not treating it. In line with the starting point of caring for employees, the company specially reminds her to go to the doctor, and issues a sick leave certificate after diagnosis, which is also in line with the sick leave process. The employee disagreed.

4. At 4 p.m., the employee and her husband came to the company and stated that they did not agree to go to The Union Hospital to see a doctor, believing that the chance of infection in the Union Hospital was too high, and the company believed that the Union Hospital was more rigorous and professional, and this reason was not established. During the period, the employee and her husband made loud noises in the company, disrupted the company's work order, made false statements in the company's WeChat group, and called the police. The police arrived to understand the situation and thought that their alarm was not true, and immediately withdrew the police. At 8 p.m., the employee and her husband left the company and announced that they would come to the company the next morning.

5. The employee claimed that "there is no one at home with children, so he cannot go to the hospital", but during this period, he spent 4 hours with his husband and his husband and two people in the company, and was not willing to spend less time, go to a hospital that is recognized as authoritative, and obtain a sick leave certificate, and repeatedly insisted on going to the hospital of his choice. Considering the precedent of the employee's alleged sick leave on December 20, the company did not agree to his request.

【Company Attitude】

1. In view of the fact that the employee's behavior on the afternoon of February 9 has seriously affected the normal working order of the company, according to the provisions of the employee handbook, the company has reached the dismissal condition, and the company issued a dismissal notice to the employee that night to maintain the normal working order of the company the next day.

2, the company cares about every serious work honest and trustworthy employees, but also must not compromise to bad behavior, we have always believed that the compromise of bad behavior is the serious, honest, honest employees hurt.