In the case of Putin's clear statement that he will not make concessions on the Ukraine issue and continue to increase troops to the border areas to ensure the security of the Russian border. The United States, as speculated, began to hesitate and did not continue to take further action. On the contrary, the US media has frequently spoken out, threatening Russia in various ways, and wanting to "surrender soldiers without a fight." Recently, the US media has released a rumor, saying that there are currently 3 countries that want to provide "deadly weapons" to Ukraine, and are waiting in line for the assessment and approval of the US government, which means that the countries waiting to "fight" Russia are queuing. However, after netizens saw the three countries in the mouth of the United States and the weapons they were ready to provide, they couldn't help but laugh, bragging is not what Americans blow like this, good to point the face, right?
According to the Observer Network reported on January 20, a number of US media revealed that Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia are planning to supply "lethal weapons" to Ukraine, including the "Javelin" anti-tank missiles made in the United States. This kind of exposure by the US media is nothing more than putting pressure on Russia, but what they did not expect was that this matter not only did not make Russia feel pressure, but was ridiculed. I believe that many people if it is not Lithuania provoked China this year, these three countries should not have stopped, adding up to not a slap in the face of the three countries, the US media is also good to blow.
The Ukraine issue, nominally a contradiction between NATO's eastward expansion and Russia' eastward expansion, is in fact clear that the United States wants to reduce Russia's strategic space and deploy weapons to Russia's doorstep. Therefore, if a direct conflict really breaks out, not to mention the small countries such as Lithuania, even the NATO allies of the United States such as France, Germany, and the United Kingdom will not play a great role, and in the end it will be a contest between the United States and Russia. Every time Russia makes a harsh remark, the United States begins to look at him left and right, pulling allies to support it, which is not its own weakness.
Since Biden took office, the foreign policy of the United States has been handled very vaguely and the direction is very unclear. Although Trump has been criticized before, he at least explicitly supports the "United Russia and Resistance against China", although it has not been successful. When biden arrived, he first stressed that the United States would focus on competition with China, followed by capriciousness on Russia, and finally provoked a new round of Ukraine. Now that the world is focusing on the Ukraine crisis, Biden has sent warships to invade China's Paracel territorial waters, deliberately provoking China.
You can't predict what Biden is going to do next, because he is a complete enemy on all sides, and he has never seen such a bold foreign strategy. Why should the US media pull the effect of these three names have not heard of the momentum, because since the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis, France and other traditional European powers have been watching coldly. The United States wants to die, the European Union has no interest in getting involved in a regional war at this time, and few countries support the United States.
As an important country near Ukraine, Poland's attitude is actually very critical for NATO, but Poland's attitude is also against the use of military means to solve the Ukrainian problem.
At the same time, Polish President Duda just announced the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics yesterday, which basically means that in their view, there will be no conflict in the short term, unless the United States acts alone and insists on replicating the 2008 War in Georgia. But in general, as long as the EU does not support it, the United States can only move its lips at best.
In the face of Russia, there are really not many equipment that can be called "deadly weapons", and there may be several types of conventional weapons in the United States, the key is whether the United States dares to use them? Ukraine is now experiencing a cold winter of lack of food and clothing, but the Western countries are desperately supporting weapons, is it too ironic, has anyone really paid attention to what Ukraine really needs? As president of Ukraine, Zelenskiy represents who exactly he represents, and there are still a few fig figs of Western democracy.