Xiao Li, a former customer service staff member at the express delivery outlets of Fuzhou Jingxiang Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd., reflected that during her work from November 8, 2021 to December 31, 2021, the company promised to pay salaries on the 25th of each month, and she did not receive her salary after leaving.
Courier outlet employees reported being owed wages
Xiaoli claimed to be owed 7066 yuan in wages, had sought the site to ask for it, and also went to the labor department to complain, but the response of the person in charge of the site made Xiaoli unacceptable.
Five other site employees also suffered from unpaid wages
Xiaoli said that in addition to her, there was a customer service and 4 couriers who did not receive wages.
Former employee Xiao Jing
I joined at the end of September and left in early November because I didn't sign an employment contract. Three months' salary was not paid, a total of 9125 yuan. When we left our job, the person in charge said that we had a few thousand yuan of express mail to pay, but she did not have a detailed form to show us, when she went to her, she kept pushing back, and in December, she ignored me.
Lawyer: The site should not deduct Xiaoli's salary
In the face of the camera, the person in charge of the outlet said that Xiaoli did not hand over the work of the outlet before leaving, so she withheld her salary.
The person in charge of the outlet
I had a conversation with her earlier, and I said that because it was the end of the year, whether it was convenient for you to do it on February 28 (2022), I agreed to leave your job.
In response to Xiaoli's situation, Luo Wei said that the law clearly stipulates that when the employer resigns, it cannot seize the employee's salary for any reason. It is a necessary act for the employee to do a good job of handover procedures with the employer, and whether there is a good handover does not affect the payment of wages.
The two sides disputed Xiaoli's attendance
In the follow-up communication, the person in charge said that there were also problems with Xiaoli's attendance.
When the mediation team recommended the liquidation of Xiaoli's salary, the head of the outlet made a new request.
For the part of Xiaoli's salary deduction, the person in charge of the outlet has changed his mouth many times. Due to the large differences between the two parties, it was finally decided to resolve the dispute through labor arbitration.
Person in charge: Xiao jing's boyfriend borrows money from outlets
It should be deducted from Xiaojing's salary
It is understood that Xiao jing's boyfriend had borrowed money at the outlet, and the person in charge of the outlet let Xiao Jing discuss with her boyfriend whether she was willing to use Xiao Jing's salary to offset her boyfriend's account, but did not get a reply, so the outlet did not pay wages. After communication, Xiaojing's salary was confirmed.
Branch Manager:
Wages have not been reconciled with couriers
The other 4 couriers reported the situation of being owed wages, and the person in charge of the outlet said that the courier had not yet checked the wages with the outlets, so it was only temporarily unpaid.
In this regard, the mediator Lao Xu believes that the outlet has the responsibility to verify the specific salary of the courier, rather than waiting for the courier to come and reconcile with the outlet.
The person in charge of the outlet also proposed that the couriers have lost the express mail, and this part of the money should be deducted.
The mediator believes that if there is a dispute over the issue of compensation, the courier can present evidence on his own to make compensation. However, the courier reported that the account was blocked, and the record was difficult to retrieve, and Lao Xu also made suggestions for the outlets.
After communication, the former customer service Xiaoli decided to go through the labor arbitration channel with the outlet to solve, and the outlet issued the salary of the former customer service Xiaojing, while the salary of the other 4 couriers will be checked in detail with the outlet, and then further negotiated to solve.
Courier: There is still a penalty record after resigning
In the process of reconciling with the courier outlets, the courier Kobayashi found that he resigned on November 30, but the punishment record shows that he still had a record of being punished until December 28, 2021.
Kobayashi
Like the express mail in the back is all in December, how did she notify me?
Reporter: He resigned on December 6.
He left on December 6th, but this was an express mail he sent while he was in office. Reporter: He didn't do it. I also left him in the work group, it is not that I did not keep him, and I let him retire later. Reporter: On December 6th, it was kicked off. On December 6th, there was no kick.
Already kicked off, see the time.
The WeChat group records provided by Kobayashi show that he quit the work group on December 6, so should the outlet be held responsible for the loss of the subsequent express mail? The mediation team came up with a solution.
Due to the large difference of opinion between the two sides, the person in charge of the outlet did not accept the mediation plan. The mediation team and couriers reported the situation to the Cangshan District Labor Security Supervision Brigade. Staff said the case was being processed.
Integrity management is the foundation of the enterprise, integrity is not only for customers, but also for the employees of the enterprise, to protect their labor remuneration, is the enterprise should be responsible. It is hoped that the express delivery outlets of Fuzhou Jingxiang Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. will take the demands of the staff seriously and give reasonable solutions. We will also continue to monitor the progress of this matter.