AMD released two desktop graphics cards at the CES exhibition at the beginning of the month - RX 6500 XT and RX 6400, of which the latter is mainly used in the OEM market, last night AMD unbanned the RX 6500 XT graphics card evaluation, including our fast technology and other domestic and foreign media synchronously launched the performance review.
As a graphics card priced at only 1599 yuan, the RX 6500 XT is a great savior in the case of various out-of-stock and price increases of the current game graphics card, allowing PC players to buy a new card with 7nm technology within 2000 yuan.
However, after the release of the review, the controversy among players on the RX 6500 XT graphics card may also be the most intense in recent years, especially its 4GB video memory and 64bit bit width, which although it limits mining, but also affects the game performance, resulting in player dissatisfaction.
Is the 1599 yuan graphics card equipped with 4GB of video memory enough? Netizens have quarreled all night because of this matter, and AMD also has a very magical operation in this matter, because they have emphasized that the video memory should be larger and need to exceed 4GB.
The article titled "Game Beyond 4GB" was released on May 6, 2020, when the RX 5500 XT graphics card was released, equipped with 8GB of video memory, and the AMD official website community specially released a blog post, claiming that 4GB of graphics exists in today's games is completely insufficient, upgrading to 8GB of video memory can bring significant performance improvements, and even almost double the most exaggerated time.
However, after the release of the RX 6500 XT graphics card, this article was suddenly deleted by AMD, the official did not give any reason, netizens speculated that this is obviously because the RX 6500 XT only has 4GB of video memory, resulting in AMD before and after the logic is not smooth, so the official deleted the previous publicity.
You think the incident is over? However, no, AMD probably saw too many criticisms, and quietly resumed this article, and now it can be viewed again.
Again, no explanation was made this time.
