Kindly invite people to dinner, the other party finished eating but backhanded a bad review, the boss wanted to cry without tears

Boss Wang opened a new Japanese food store, and soon after a salesman came to the door and wanted to talk to him about online cooperation.

These include promotional reviews on various online platforms, which cost about 10,000 yuan per month, and the two sides talked in the store four times, but in the end there was no successful cooperation. He politely said that he would not sign the contract for the time being, and wait until his store operation was stable.

The sale was not benevolent, and Boss Wang also generously invited her to a meal, with a total price of 406 yuan. But two days later, he found that there was a half-star review on the public review, involving various aspects such as environmental ingredient service tastes, accompanied by photos. This is the worst rating on the platform, he is very confused, thinking that there should not be such a low bad review, so he carefully looked through the evaluation.

But through the details of the photos, I found that this review was done by the salesman. Because next to the photo food, there is the owner's computer and the kettle, and the average guest will not put such a thing on the desktop. Then he looked through the user's historical reviews and found the other party's selfie.

Boss Wang said that the cooperation that sales wanted to sign at the beginning was to maintain star ratings and promotion, and she was familiar with this process. Now I have a shop that has managed to achieve 4.6 stars, and I have been beaten to 4.0 stars. Star rating is very important for the catering industry, consumers often go to see, but also according to the star to choose the restaurant, the day of eating did not happen anything unpleasant, he does not understand why to retaliate against himself.

He then contacted the salesman again, who not only did not apologize, but also blamed him for posting his own photos. It turned out that Boss Wang had previously sent her the selfie private chat in the account to confirm whether he was himself or not, but he did not get a response. The other party also said that it was irrelevant to eat and whether it was good or not, and he just wrote down his true feelings.

But Boss Wang believes that this incident occurred at such a point in time, which is obviously malicious, and hopes that the other party can delete the evaluation. Because the other party did not respond, the reporter had to reflect the situation to her company, but the company did not have any reply.

Accepting the kindness of others, but taking revenge, such an act is indeed unkind. Reviews are the rights of consumers, but rights should not be abused, and everyone should be pertinent and rational evaluations, not for revenge, or even let reviews become a tool for profit.