"Ten thousand fans" Chen Hao has not published a paper but became a professor? Is it really "misclassified"?

"Ten thousand fans" Chen Hao has not published a paper but became a professor? Is it really "misclassified"?

Qiao Zhifeng

Didn't publish a paper but became a professor? Chen Hao Studio responded: Never participated in the evaluation of professor qualifications.

Recently, some netizens broke the news that the name of the well-known actor Chen Hao appeared in the "Professor" column of the Performance Department on the official website of the Central Academy of Drama. However, in the CNKI search, it was found that Chen Hao had not even published a paper. Publishing papers is one of the most important indicators for evaluating professors, Chen Hao does not have any theoretical research results, how can he be a professor?

The matter sparked a heated discussion on the Internet, and then the Central Academy of Drama moved the actor Chen Hao's name from the "Professor" column of the Acting Department to the newly opened "National First-class Actor" column. In this regard, Chen Hao Studio responded: "Teacher Chen Hao has never participated in the evaluation of professor qualifications. After the official website of the college found that the classification was wrong, it was corrected at the first time. It has caused misunderstandings to everyone, and I hereby explain. (The Paper, June 23)

"Ten thousand people" triggered "ten thousand people's discussion". In this regard, some people think that as long as professional courses are well taught, even if they do not publish papers, it is reasonable to be a professor; others believe that academic regulations evaluate professors must have papers published, if the basic theories are not passed, how to talk about education?

The two views that netizens seem to be diametrically opposed actually have a certain truth, but the angles they stand on are different.

First of all, under the existing title evaluation system, there are quantitative requirements for the publication of papers for evaluation professors, so they must be strictly enforced, and everyone should meet the standards, even celebrities and celebrities.

Second, whether the professor must publish a paper, and whether the current evaluation criteria are scientific and reasonable, should allow discussion or even debate. In my personal opinion, the professor's evaluation should mainly look at the real talent, minimize other additional conditions, and the thesis indicators should not be overly mechanical.

In a word: the existing rules should be strictly observed; and the current rules are also necessary to further improve and improve.

In fact, the thesis has always been one of the main preconditions for many fields to get a degree, a title, and be reused, and it will toss people not lightly. Some people are tormented and exhausted for their papers, and some people are eager to publish papers and pay "page fees", and they do not hesitate to cheat and deceive themselves.

Last year, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology issued the "Opinions" pointing out that there are one-sided, excessive and distorted use of SCI paper-related indicators in the current scientific research evaluation, and it is necessary to standardize the use of SCI paper-related indicators in various evaluation work. It is necessary to accurately understand the SCI paper and related indicators, and deeply understand the negative impact of the sci supremacy of the paper. At the same time, we should actively explore the establishment of a scientific evaluation system. It is necessary to standardize the use of SCI paper related indicators, optimize the evaluation method of professional titles (positions), and do not use SCI paper related indicators as the direct basis for the evaluation of professional titles (positions), as well as preconditions for personnel employment.

This shows that the problems in related fields have attracted enough attention and are changing to make progress in a more scientific and rational direction. However, at the same time, we should also soberly realize that some chronic diseases have a long history, and it is difficult to change them overnight, and may also face some inertia and resistance, which require long-term and sustained efforts and advancement.

Finally, I would like to say a few so-called "misclassified" explanations. A professor is a professor, a first-class actor is a first-class actor, it is not the same thing at all, as a well-known university, it is impossible to even distinguish the difference between them. I wonder how "misclassification" happens? Is it really "misclassified", or is it questioned and then used as a "misclassification" to excuse it?

In fact, celebrities and celebrities as professors, not to mention has become the "new normal", at least this kind of news has been heard endlessly, and it is common in the media. Stars such as Jackie Chan, Feng Gong, Zhao Benshan, and Li Xiang have all been labeled as "university professors" and have been "preaching and teaching to solve puzzles" for college students. Professors take turns and come to our house this year.

Celebrities and celebrities as professors, as long as they do have a level and deserve it, it is not impossible. Unfortunately, some stars are red, but it is very confusing to be able to teach students how many ways, how many karmas to teach, and how many puzzles to solve. A more typical example is that when Li Xiang appeared as a visiting professor at the Sichuan Normal University Film and Television College, perhaps overly nervous, in the one-hour speech, Li Xiang, who has always been confident, became extremely unconfident, not only appeared to be "tricky" as "hot hands" and other low-level mistakes, but also frequently apologized and said "sorry, please forgive" every time he answered a question. Not only that, when talking about the bittersweet and bittersweet and public opinion pressure that the host needs to face, Li Xiang actually shed tears several times, which shocked the teachers and students at the scene. Some people joke that children are the flowers of the motherland, "tricky" into "hot hands", Professor Li This is simply "hot hands" to destroy flowers.

Needless to say, some universities hire celebrities and celebrities as professors, and they do not attach too much importance to their ability to "teach" and "teach", and they value their influence more. Still taking Professor Li Xiang as an example, hearing that she was going to become a professor, "the Students of Sichuan Division were all excited", the school not only laid a red carpet to welcome Li Xiang, but also arranged for 20 students in light makeup to stand in two teams at the entrance of the theater, and 10 students wearing on-duty armbands were stationed at the other two entrances together with the school security guards. At the corner of the theater, many students who could not enter the theater waited in groups of three or five with cameras waiting for Li Xiang's arrival. Is this a class? This is clearly a farce and vulgar entertainment carnival for star-chasing assistance!

The trend of celebrities and celebrities being professors is stopped. Let the entertainment return to entertainment and education to education.