laitimes

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

War always brings a lot of harm, especially when the war of aggression against China, it really paid a heavy price, although at that time Japan's ambitions were very large, after the occupation of the three northeastern provinces, it threatened to occupy China for three months, but even so, we did not give up our own country, but fought hard.

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

Japan's ambitions are also getting stronger and stronger, so it has the determination to invade the world, but also to tease the United States, in the face of Japan's teasing, the United States is also very happy to give back two atomic bombs, as these two mushroom clouds rose on Japan's territory, Japan also gradually lost the heart of resistance, and finally announced unconditional surrender.

I don't know if you have a question when facing such a thing, that is, will Japan really surrender unconditionally? In fact, this is not the case, do not think too simple, at that time Japan also attached three shameless conditions, and it is precisely because of such conditions that it greatly protected many of Japan's interests at that time.

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

First of all, the first condition is to retain the system of the emperor. I believe that many small partners who know more about history are more clear that in such a war, the Japanese emperor is the biggest war criminal, but when the Japanese army fights, it is also under the slogan of loyalty to the emperor.

In fact, the emperor is the most important person to incite public sentiments, and such a condition to retain the emperor's system is to protect Japan's militarist system, and such a condition also means that Japan can still resurrect itself, and has not given up its determination to invade and occupy the world!

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

The second condition is that all war criminals are solved by themselves. In fact, when you see such conditions, you are really well-intentioned, all the war criminals are solved by themselves, many of them are famous and famous, which cannot be forgiven, but most of them can be forgiven, and they are saved their lives through such conditions.

There are even people who have committed a little great evil, and after returning to their own country, their lives are even better, and they even sit on high-ranking officials, such conditions are really shameless. I really don't know, how to say such a condition, the sin I committed, is it still not clear in my heart?

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

The third condition is that multiple countries are not allowed to enter Japan at the same time. In fact, there are certain reasons for saying such conditions, that is, at the time of World War II, Germany was occupied by four countries at the same time, and the most injured people should be the people, who accepted the destruction of four countries.

Of course, in order to prevent such a thing from happening, the Japanese army put forward such conditions, and also to prevent its own country from being divided into four. I have to say that these three conditions are really perfect to save Japan and protect their entire interests, which is really shameless!

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached

I wonder how you felt when you saw this?

Was Japan really surrendering unconditionally? The idea is too simple, with three shameless conditions attached.

Read on