laitimes

Huya was lifted to the employee party: The original judgment was upheld in the second instance, and Huya refused to implement the court's judgment for the time limit

Sanyan Finance News on January 13, today, Weibo certified as "'Huya was lifted employee party" users posted that the second instance upheld the original judgment, Huya refused to implement the court's judgment for the time limit.

Huya was lifted to the employee party: The original judgment was upheld in the second instance, and Huya refused to implement the court's judgment for the time limit

The Weibo user said that his current lawsuit against Huya for infringement of rights to body, health, property rights and other rights has been made by the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court on December 29, 2021, the result is to uphold the original judgment of the first instance, Huya publicly apologized to it on its official Weibo "Huya Live" account within 5 days after the judgment and retained it for 7 days, and compensated a total of 5,016 yuan for medical expenses and property losses within 10 days. But nearly half a month after the court's judgment, Huya still refuses to carry out the apology.

Huya was lifted to the employee party: The original judgment was upheld in the second instance, and Huya refused to implement the court's judgment for the time limit

According to Red Star News, Huya responded: "At present, from the company's point of view, in fact, our official Weibo has apologized, and what we talked to him at that time was that this was the personal behavior of HR, but he did not accept it." ”

On December 21, 2021, the Weibo user posted that after 414 days of the incident, he finally won the case.

The first-instance judgment shows that Guangzhou Huya Technology Co., Ltd. paid a one-time payment of 5,016 yuan to Zhang within 10 days from the date of legal effect of the judgment; Guangzhou Huya Technology Co., Ltd. published an apology statement on Sina Weibo on the "Huya Live Broadcast" account within five days from the date of legal effect of the judgment (maintained for 7 days, the content of the statement must be reviewed by the people's court in advance), and if it is not performed within the time limit, the people's court will publish the judgment in Guangzhou Daily, and the publication cost will be borne by the defendant Guangzhou Huya Technology Co., Ltd.

Sina Technology reported at the time that it learned from Huya that the parties to Huya 's removal (Zhang Qiao) and Huya were involved in three cases: labor arbitration, labor disputes, and tort liability disputes. Among them, in the labor arbitration case, Huya was lifted by the party lost the lawsuit; in the labor dispute case, the Party who was lifted by Huya lost the lawsuit and had initiated an appeal; and in the tort liability dispute case, Huya lost the lawsuit and had launched an appeal.

On November 6, 2020, netizens who claimed to be "huya was lifted" posted on social platforms, saying that they had been violently dismissed by the company. And depression due to cold violence from immediate leadership. The netizen said that after he refused to sign the dismissal letter, the company's HR rate of 5 people carried it out of the company. The netizen said that his personal belongings could not be taken away, and the head impact during the whole process caused psychological and physical setbacks.

In the article, the netizen revealed that his direct leaders insulted him with words such as eating and not suitable for this job, and was embarrassed at work.

Since then, the direct leaders have arranged KPIs for it, requiring them to increase the data of the five anchors by 8 to 10 times on September 30. But then bluntly said, "Don't save this money, just talk about compensation." Later, Huya HR said that it accidentally learned that the netizen had a month and a half of work experience that was not reflected in the resume, so it fired him and expelled him from the company on the grounds of "resume fraud".

Read on