The Nets lost again, losing to the Blazers, who didn't have a double gun. We look at the essence through the phenomenon, such a Net is by no means the level he should be, why has the recent Nets disappointed people again and again?
Throughout this game, the Blazers played very targeted from the beginning. Constantly creating opportunities on the inside, the result was that the starting center Clarkston lost three fouls in 4 minutes, Duke twice in 6 minutes, and Irving also had 2. The result was obvious, the Nets lost one or the other on the defensive end, and finally embattled, and were opened by the Blazers. The offensive end is also subject to foul trouble and can only rely on the individual play of Irving and Durant. But just as the so-called two-fisted is difficult to defeat four hands, Durant and Irving have to face multiple attacks as long as they hold the ball. In the end, the nets attacked and defended both ends of the game and looked like they were all messed up into a pot of porridge.
The Nets lack tactical changes, and this clear-eyed man can now see through it at a glance, but where is the key node? As this game shows, it is the lack of internal strength. Aldridge was not in this game, and the Blazers used Nurkic to this point. In the first half, the inside line continued to play, and when the Nets defense began to shrink in the second half, the Blazers' outside line opened again.
Harden was absent again with a knee injury in this game, and after coming to the Nets, injuries seem to be increasingly starting to find Harden. In this game, back-to-back second game, Durant played 42 minutes again after playing 43 minutes in the previous game. This has to worry, how long can Durant hold out under such a load?
Many people criticize Nash for not having any tactics at all, relying on the singles of the Big Three. In fact, there is nothing wrong with this. They are all superstars who need the ball, what can they do if they don't play alone? Nash's mistake was that he forgot that from the composition of the big three to the present, there are only a few games in which the big three really come together.
Last season's East Finals, Harden played with an injury, and the scene of Durant single-handedly picking the Bucks is still vivid. However, the nets only strengthened the outside defense in the offseason. The core direction of the team's adjustment is still completely arranged in accordance with the system of the big three. The result? Irving's long absence due to "disobedience" this season has led to a cliff-like decline in Griffin's form. The Nets can only watch as they continue to fall into a passive situation.
But even in this situation, Nash's approach is still to constantly adjust from the lineup, but never want to respond to the tactical system. Some time ago, when Harden and Durant led the team alone, the Nets actually performed well. The problem was that after Durant and Harden returned at the same time, Nash did not combine the characteristics of the two to make the tactical arrangements they should have. Or let the two single-core lead the way of playing, each playing its own.
After this game, Durant averaged 37.4 minutes per game, ranking second in the league. Nash still hasn't come up with a response, or blindly using superstars to single, how far can such a Net go in the playoffs? The cards of the super three are played into this situation, and Nash really can't play cards.
(Text/shitou)