laitimes

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

The hypothesis of Atlantis's sudden disappearance has piqued curiosity, but the "vanishing continent" does not mean that it is indeed Atlantis. This is what academic research in the development of geology says.

Until the 17th century, it was still believed that all matter had vitality and a vivid theory of life. Even the stones that came out of the ground thought they had grown up like creatures. If they can't dig gold when they dig gold in the mine, they close the mine until the gold grows again, and they continue to dig.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

At that time, the biggest headache for scholars was the fossils excavated everywhere. Fossils of shells or fish have appeared on the top of the mountain, and fossils have also been found in deserts where humans have not lived. Scholars know that fossils are "biological remains that solidify like stones," but most deny this. Fossils are thought not to be the remains of plants and animals, but rather stones that occasionally look like living organisms.

In medieval Europe, where the Christian worldview was tightly unified, the phrase "science is the handmaiden of theology" should also be interpreted as an interpretation consistent with "biblical discourse." They explained that the fossil shells found on the mountain were left behind after the shells that rushed up the mountain during Noah's Flood died. He also believes that the strange animal fossils that have become extinct are the result of God's attempt to create them out of clay, but he accidentally did not give them life. Some Christians believe that demons would make fossils to disturb humans.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

It wasn't until the 18th century that people began to realize that fossils were remnants of past organisms. On this basis, the theories of earth history and biological evolution came into being.

Darwin's 1859 book, On the Origin of Species, has thrown up a variety of research topics. According to his theory, if similar species evolved from a common ancestor, then the evidence should be there. The German zoologist Ernst Haeckel, who firmly believes in Darwin's theory of evolution, believes that after great changes, the earth has become what it is now, and the evolution and adaptation of organisms have undergone tremendous changes.

In many parts of the earth, sometimes slowly, sometimes violently, the surface sinks and rises, continents and islands descend, and new mountains emerge. Islands became mountains, peninsulas became islands, and even islands became continents.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

Haeckel investigated the distribution of primates and found that some organisms on different continents were similar, and concluded that organisms could not fly over the Indian Ocean by natural means. He said: 'Creatures cannot cross the Indian Ocean. How could they still exist on all continents? I think that means that these areas used to be connected to land. He also speculates that fossils that prove that Darwinian evolution evolved from monkeys cannot be found anywhere because humans appear on vanished continents and african continents. Haeckel promised that the ape-man fossils that could prove his claims would be found on two continents, naming the cause "Homo erectus" in advance.

He came to this conclusion because he assumed that the cradle of humanity was on a continent sinking into the Indian Ocean. The first person he named was "Peter Kanter Rope Salted Fish".

Haeckel's "Lost Mysterious Continent" was called the "Continent of Lemuria" by the British zoologist Philips Clatt. Lemuria is almost identical to Gondwana in Africa, South America, Australia, New Zealand and Antarctica about 200 million years ago, hence the name Lemuria.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

The reason why "Sketrate" calls the lost continent "Lemuria" is because it examines the evolution of lemurs, the lemurs that lived in Madagascar, and found that lemurs once lived on the continent advocated by Haeckel. Scutter found that there are no Limo monkeys on the African continent adjacent to Madagascar (more recently, it has been found that the Limo monkeys inhabit Africa), but in sumatra, far from the Indian Ocean. He believes there is a continent across the Indian Ocean, from Madagascar to Sumatra.

Igna Isla is one of madagascar's attractions, found not in Africa, but in the Galapagos Islands, the Antilles, the Fiji Islands and South America in the Pacific. In addition, Proffs live in Madagascar and India, but not in Africa.

In terms of the distribution of flora and fauna, the flora and fauna of Madagascar bear striking resemblance to those of India. Whether plants and animals are flowing from India to Madagascar or from India to Madagascar, migration requires crossing the ocean. The flora and fauna of Madagascar are very similar to those of Australia and South America. In response, Sklater proposed a hypothesis that only a "land bridge" between Africa and the American continent that disappeared without a trace could explain this phenomenon.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

Paleontologists strongly support Scarlett's views. This is because the evolutionary distribution of paleontology advocated by Haeckel et al. is reasonably explained. The hypothesis that the Lemurian continent including Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles, and the Comoros was supported by Emil Fahd of France, Oscar Petchell of Germany, Darwin, and Alfred Wallace, co-discoverer of evolution.

Sergei, a former Soviet geologist, said it was enough to think that geological data on the mainland did exist in the Indian Ocean seafloor survey. In 1972, the academic research vessel "Gromer Challenge" surveyed a ridge about 700 miles south of Madagascar, and the ship sank more than 1,600 meters within a range of 20 million meters. In addition, in the shallow seas of the Seychelles and Saudi Arabia, the seafloor was found sinking 2,000 meters in front of it. In particular, a remnant of a 10th- to 11th-century Arab architecture has been found on the seabed in northwestern Madagascar, meaning that ground subsidence occurred centuries ago.

Is it true that the hypothesis of the sudden disappearance of Atlantis has piqued curiosity?

Ancient Indian legend is about some of the cities that sank to the bottom of the sea. Probably because the oldest Indian script, the "Triple," the city of Ass, where the classical Mahabharata and other ministers lived, sank into the sea, and God's eyes avoided it, and it disappeared.

Read on