laitimes

From the perspective of history, the Chinese nation is not a martial nation

In contrast, there are often things that say that Russia is a fighting nation, which can be said to be, isn't there a video on the Internet about the story of a man and a bear? The Russian man was carrying the bear at first, the bear slowly approached, the man looked back, the bear froze, and then ran away in gray! Similarly, there are many people on the Internet who say that the Chinese nation is a non-martial nation, which I really don't agree with!

From the perspective of history, the Chinese nation is not a martial nation

During the Spring and Autumn Warring States period, there were as few as ten thousand and as many as tens of thousands, and the battles in the Spring and Autumn Warring States period were all chariots, the two sides agreed on the location, set up a good position, and more than a thousand generals fought each other, talking about winning the battle front. After a battle, it is very normal to kill a thousand enemies and lose eight hundred, and the battle at this time is not based on individuals as combat units, but with one team and one pick as the most basic combat units. Take the famous Battle of Changping, for example, the Qin State dispatched more than 400,000 troops, the Zhao State more than 400,000 troops, and the strength of the two sides reached a terrifying strength of more than 800,000, which is not a bluff that claims to be a million but tens of thousands, but a real combat force of more than 800,000. In the Battle of Changping, both sides understood that in order to win, first of all, there must be enough people, under the premise of equal troop strength, there is a possibility of victory, of course, these 800,000 do not include soldiers and civilians of the logistics supply line, if these troops are counted, not to mention millions, and Europe in the same period is the era of the Roman Empire, the combined combat strength of the two sides is only 100,000.

From the perspective of history, the Chinese nation is not a martial nation

During the Han Dynasty, there was a relatively well-known group- the Huns, or Xiongnu, first look at this period, a period that made Europe frightened, the Germanic invasion. In the late fourth century AD, thousands of Germans suddenly poured into the borders of the Roman Empire to seek refuge, for the simple reason that behind their butts there was a group of barbarians who hunted down and crushed them, a group they called the Huns. A large part of the history of the Qin and Han Dynasties has the shadow of the Xiongnu, and the Great Wall of Qin xiu is to be able to block the impact of the cavalry of the northern tribes, and once the cavalry momentum is blocked, the infantry can give the cavalry a fatal blow. The same is true of the Han Dynasty, in the early Han Dynasty, it once became a huge threat to the Western Han, and even needed tribute and peace to ease the contradictions, and later there was the Han's efforts to be strong, Wei Qing and Huo Wentyi defeated the Xiongnu in one fell swoop, driving them away from the Central Plains, making them defeated generals under Han. But it is such a defeated army that when it reaches Europe, it will wreak havoc everywhere, destroying cities and pulling down villages, and no one can stop them. Europe at that time was called the Dark Europe, because of the Killing of the Huns, to one place, to destroy one place, to one city, to destroy a city, and to make the whole of Europe restless.

From the perspective of history, the Chinese nation is not a martial nation

Therefore, from a historical point of view, the Chinese nation is not unarmed, but just does not want to do personal ability, and peace is the constant topic.

Read on