In the 1970s, with the assistance of China and the Soviet Union, Vietnam defeated the aggression of US imperialism and realized national reunification, and since then Vietnam's ambitions have been expanding day by day, and it has even vainly tried to dominate Asia, so it sent troops to invade the neighboring small countries and meddle in the internal affairs of other countries. At that time, Sino-Soviet relations were already bad, and Vietnam saw this opportunity, in order to curry favor with the Soviet Union and get greater help from the other side, so it dared to invade China's border areas.
Under the ineffectiveness of many warnings, our army launched a counterattack in self-defense, and it took a month to complete the purpose of teaching the other side, so it withdrew its troops from Vietnam in victory, and this war was a defense war for the justice of our country. At that time, many countries called for world peace, and they had their own views on the war of counterattack against Vietnam, which were reflected in the textbooks of various countries, and today we will take a look at how Russia, Vietnam, and Japan view this period of history, which can be said to be very different.
First, the Japanese textbook of yin and yang weirdness.
According to the records, Japan, like the United States, called on both China and Vietnam to remain sane and demanded that we withdraw troops from Vietnam and Vietnam withdraw troops from Cambodia. But in their textbooks, they focused on the casualties of the Vietnamese and the brutality of the Vietnamese battlefield, vaguely treating us as "invaders." Although Japan does not explicitly say who is right and who is wrong, it is not difficult to guess Japan's wolf ambitions. When we think of Japan's war of aggression against China, their textbooks describe the war of aggression against China as just, and they deliberately beautify the war, distort the real history, and falsify history, and they know that the United States and Japan are a nest of snakes and rats.
Second, pertinent Russian textbooks.
In the Russian textbook description of the "Sino-Vietnamese war", relative to Japan is more objective, perhaps because of the former Soviet Union, Russia is not good to do too much evaluation, it chose a compromise method, first said that the Vietnamese invasion must be bad, and then also recorded that before the counterattack war, China has submitted a statement to the United Nations in advance to prove the just counterattack of this war. It is rare that Russia's views are still biased towards historical facts and justice, and it is indeed valuable.
Third, Vietnamese textbooks that distort the facts.
It is reported that after our victorious withdrawal of troops, Vietnam also announced their victory in the war, and this cheeky approach is also no one. Vietnam has also written this history into textbooks, and not only that, it has also distorted history, describing us as an aggressor, a provocateur of war, and finally surrendering and withdrawing troops after the defeat of our army under the heroic resistance of the Vietnamese soldiers and civilians. For this kind of self-deception in Vietnam, I have to say that there is a fight with the Japanese army, and everyone can just look at the joke. In any case, we must bear in mind the lessons of history and defend peace.