As a "loyal thug" of the United States in the Atlantic Ocean, Britain has always been very good at following the anti-China aspect of the "big brother" of the United States. Especially after the Biden administration held the so-called "democracy summit" on December 9-10 this year, the United Kingdom was like a "steroid" and began to pressure the Chinese side on the so-called "genocide" in Xinjiang, not only through civil court to publicly violate China's judicial rights, but also followed the United States announcement that it would not send officials to the Beijing Winter Olympics in China, with the intention of politicizing sports events.
According to the latest report from Deutsche Welle (DW), the civil court is an unofficial independent body set up by British barristers called The Uyghur Tribunal, and after fully evaluating the evidence that "China is suspected of violating the rights of Uighurs", the agency released its conclusions last Thursday (December 9) that China was guilty of "genocide and crimes against humanity". At the cusp of the new Omicron new crown variant is raging madly in the UK, London has not only not focused on fighting the epidemic, but has accompanied the Biden administration to play a "democratic game". In this regard, we can only describe it as having nothing to do when we are full.
The topic of democracy and human rights can be described as a cliché, while the history of the British Johnson government's pro-democracy offensive against China is even more "long", from hong Kong's "Occupy Central" in 2014 to "anti-sending China" in 2019, these "Hong Kong independence elements" have the shadow of British hawkish politicians remotely controlled behind them. If you look at it by generation, the so-called "democracy summit" recently held by US President Joe Biden can only be regarded as a "younger brother". Britain and the United States are now a court and a summit, and their sinister intentions are clear. But where is democracy based on the violation of the judicial rights of other countries and interference in the internal affairs of other countries? By the same standard, can the United Kingdom face up to the "democracy" of the Scottish people in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, and whether the United States can respect the "human rights" of the California people in the 2015 Yes California Independence Campaign. Obviously, the two "Western powers" of Britain and the United States do not treat each other equally on the issue of democracy and human rights, and carry a strong "double standard" color. It is completely under the cover of the cloak of democracy that it is the practice of dividing other countries.
The people's eyes are shining, and against the backdrop of the vast number of people in Xinjiang living and working in peace and contentment in China, the British people's accusations of such nonsense cannot help but feel infuriating and funny. Ignoring the true voice of the people of Xinjiang and listening to the so-called testimony of the "Xinjiang independenceists," we should instead ask what the British and American politicians really have in mind. According to the organization's website, the Uyghur Court is nothing more than an independent People's Court that the President of the World Uyghur Congress, Dolkun Isa, asked Sir Jeffrey Nice to set up and chair in June 2020 to investigate "continuing atrocities and possible genocide" against the Uighur, Kazakh and other Muslim populations. Eventually, the Uyghur Court was established on September 3, 2020, with the assistance of the NGO Coalition against Genocide, which simply did not have any sanctioning powers. In other words, the organization is at best a tool used by Britain and the United States to "disgust" our political propaganda, secretly taking the government's "propaganda fees" and carrying out "separatist activities" against us, which is "not aggressive, but extremely insulting", even if the Chinese side is held accountable through diplomatic means, the British can very cunningly say that this is the spontaneous behavior of their own "democrats".
For the brazen behavior of these "democratic countries" in the West, we also expect that China will also mobilize the initiative of more than a billion netizens in China in the form of a private referendum and a court, open office investment and courtrooms on the independence of Scotland and California, and support the "democratic cause" of britain and the United States.
Doing the right thing and walking properly has always been the basic tenet of China's style of acting in the international community. As the saying goes, the best way to deal with magic is to use magic must defeat magic as well," a quote from the American animated Jackie Chan Adventures, but the true meaning of the geopolitical game. On the issue of tracing the origin of the new crown in 2019, we have seen the practice of the Chinese side in mobilizing the power of netizens to "line up" with the Western political propaganda machine. That is, on July 30 this year, the China Global Television Network (CGTN) think tank, using the United Nations Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish six official languages, published on Youtu, Twitter, Facebook, Weibo, weChat a questionnaire report advocating the World Health Organization (WHO) to investigate the US biological laboratory.
After the investigation was launched, it immediately attracted the enthusiastic vote of netizens from all over the world, the number of people participating in the vote was more than 10 million, and a total of 83.1% of netizens believed that the United States should cooperate with the WHO's new crown traceability survey, which made the Biden administration, which was a thief, suddenly lose face and lose its prestige. In the case of the so-called "Uyghur court" held in the United Kingdom, this trick of "treating others in the way of others" is also applicable, which can not only promote the enthusiasm of Chinese netizens to participate in international events, but also cultivate the sense of ownership and elegant patriotism of young netizens.
On the diplomatic front, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian has long responded to the "final judgment" of the Uyghur court, saying that this "court" has neither any legal qualifications nor any credibility, and the sinister intentions of many previous anti-China activities have been punctured by the facts and despised by people of insight in the international community. Such a 'lie-making machine' engaging in the so-called 'final verdict' is a political farce performed by a few beam-jumping clowns."
It is worth noting that a few days before China and Russia were "shut out" by the Biden administration's democracy summit, the leader of the "Hong Kong independence" elements, Luo Guancong, who was granted British asylum, announced on December 5 through Facebook that he had been officially invited by US President Biden to participate in the summit, and on the morning of December 10, US East Coast time, during the discussion sessions of "protecting human rights" and "consolidating democracy and resisting authoritarianism", he gave a speech connecting the two to the representatives of more than 100 countries. During the speech, Nathan Law also publicly stated: "As the only Hong Kong person invited, in this speech, in addition to talking about the CCP's threat to the international community and the democratic struggle in Hong Kong and other regions, I will also call on the international community to unite against the rise of authoritarianism and no longer lack vigilance as before." Only by rallying the largest number of democracies to defend freedom will we have the possibility of rekindling the wave of democracy. ”
A democracy summit in which "Hong Kong independence" and "Taiwan independence" elements were present but was not attended by Chinese representatives has been criticized by the media of various countries for lacking its authority and questioning its legitimacy. Steven Feldstein, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank, found a "point" in the list of invitees and published an article stating: "According to freedom House's 2021 report, 77 of the invited countries were rated as 'free' or fully democratic, 31 invitees were rated as 'partially free', and the other 3 were completely 'unfree' camps." The Biden administration's intention to hold a "gang gathering" to isolate China and Russia is already like Sima Zhao's heart, which can be described as well known. And Britain's singing and harmony of its "big brother" is even more flattering and sensational.
The first case of Omicron variant death in the United Kingdom is still busy hyping up the issue of China's Xinjiang. Since the first case of Omicron was detected on British soil on November 27 this year, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has implemented stricter restrictions and warned on the 12th of this month: "This variant may overcome the immune defenses of people who have received two doses of vaccine." Sajid Javid, the UK's health secretary, also pointed out: "The variant currently accounts for 44% of Infections in London and may become the main strain in London within 48 hours, with an estimated 200,000 new Cases of Omicron infection in a single day." Sadly, the once-invincible "British Empire" has now become a microphone used by the United States to suppress China, and has become a complete "great baby empire.". After catering to the US Asia-Pacific strategy and constantly hyping up the so-called "Hong Kong issue of China", the United Kingdom, which has been "terminally ill" under the new crown epidemic, has once again engaged in sports and democratic politicization, which will surely become an "orphan country" that the United States is not close to and Europe does not love.
Regarding the so-called democratic offensive launched by the United Kingdom and the United States and other countries against China, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said at a press conference hosted on December 13: "China has made a statement on the so-called 'Leaders' Democracy Summit held by the United States. Some media reports pointed out that the international community responded coldly to the 'summit', and the broadcast traffic of the 'summit' video on social media was also very dismal. On the contrary, videos exposing the military intervention and killing of innocent civilians by the United States in the name of democracy have gone viral online. This once again shows that the United States is unpopular in its own selfish interests in using the banner of democracy. The 'Democracy Summit' has just torn through the false mask of the US 'democracy defenders' and exposed the true face of the US 'democracy saboteurs'. Facts have proved that the tricks of the United Kingdom, the United States and other countries to "throw the pot" at China's domestic contradictions are no longer enough to watch.